tskaze Posted September 18, 2005 Posted September 18, 2005 I've been reading this book, and i really like it, but im wondering what parts are true and which are fiction. I don't care even a little bit about the religious conspiracy aspects, but various things like the church waging a smear campaign against the pentacle are hard to tell between fact and fiction. I'm guessing brown didnt falsify EVERYTHING but i also doubt he never took some artistic license. so if someone could either tell me a few truths from it, or point me to a site with no agenda (religios or non-religious) id really appreciate it.
ecoli Posted September 18, 2005 Posted September 18, 2005 Here's some propaganda refuting every word in that book. Believe what you want. http://www.christianitytoday.com/history/newsletter/2003/nov7.html
ydoaPs Posted September 18, 2005 Posted September 18, 2005 Here's some propaganda refuting every word in that book. Believe what you want. http://www.christianitytoday.com/history/newsletter/2003/nov7.html Christianity Today..........i wonder why they would be against it
ecoli Posted September 18, 2005 Posted September 18, 2005 They're pissed off when Dan Brown claimed that Jesus was mortal, and not literally the son of God.
AzurePhoenix Posted September 19, 2005 Posted September 19, 2005 That's absurd! Now who on God's green Earth would believe such foolhardy heresy? Let us be filled with righteous fury and burn the heathen in the name of the Holy Father!
Bettina Posted September 19, 2005 Posted September 19, 2005 He was mortal.....thats the sad part. I would say that was probably my favorite book of all time.....so far. Bettina
insane_alien Posted September 19, 2005 Posted September 19, 2005 he died twice so hes more mortal than us. most people only die once
Newtonian Posted September 19, 2005 Posted September 19, 2005 Ode to the gullible...............its a novel.........a story........made up.....ya know like independance day with will smith(guess what....there is a white house....and aeroplanes....must be a true story then)
Severian Posted September 19, 2005 Posted September 19, 2005 Not only was it a pile of illogical crap with badly thought out arguments, it was also badly written. Edit: With regard to the veracity of Dan Brown's sources, remember that this is the same author who had a terrorist stealing anti-matter from CERN by carrying it out in a suitcase....
AzurePhoenix Posted September 19, 2005 Posted September 19, 2005 I thought the writing itself was decent but tiresome, and much of his plot was lacking in originiality, far too cliche. I don't actually mind him rewriting history for fiction (I read Dirk Pitt novels for God's Sake) but the storyline was reminiscent of many sub-avergage treasure hunt stories, and throughout, no shocking revelations were actually discovered, the main character simply told you about them. That in itself was an enormous mistake. And then in the ending, it didn't finish with a thrilling bang, it just sort of reached a very subtle peak, and finished off quietly.
AL Posted September 19, 2005 Posted September 19, 2005 The book read like a plot out of a very typical, moderately-budgeted Hollywood suspense flick. Although this was the reason I didn't think the book was that great, it's also the reason I suspect so many people loved it. In any event, regarding the alleged "facts" of the book, there really is a Priory of Sion, but it's a real-life scam. One of the founding members of the group admitted that the group was created as part of an elaborate ruse in the mid-20th century, yet Brown puts it into his novel as though the group has had its roots and connections to the grail going back ages. But again, this book is fiction and should be acknowledged as such. I just singled out the Priory bit because Brown put it in his intro as part of the "factual" elements of the book.
Phi for All Posted September 19, 2005 Posted September 19, 2005 The Search function (a marvelous mighty mechanism of Knowledge) reveals another thread on this subject: http://www.scienceforums.net/forums/showthread.php?t=12528&highlight=davinci+code
jordan Posted September 20, 2005 Posted September 20, 2005 The book read like a plot out of a very typical, moderately-budgeted Hollywood suspense flick. Speaking of that...
ecoli Posted September 20, 2005 Posted September 20, 2005 I didn't realize they'd finished filming already. Trailer looks pretty cool. I didn't like the ending of DaVinci code, I hope they fix it.
Hellbender Posted September 20, 2005 Posted September 20, 2005 It wasn't a bad book. I don't know why it makes everyone so hot under the collar. It had some good points, but also a disappointing ending, and wierd logic. Still, it was a pretty good conspiracy book. Reminded me of playing Metal Gear games.
ctc7752 Posted November 30, 2005 Posted November 30, 2005 There actually is a 'Davinci Code' in the Bible but it is definitely not what he said it is. The best way to find it is to buy a reference Bible and pick any passage and follow it around until the realization comes to you.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now