BIG BANG AUTO-MECHANIC'S TAKE ON THINGS

[FRAGMASTER2023]

 

 

The big bang did not start with the explosion of a single ATOM of matter alone. THE ENERGY CREATED would be negligible in viewing our end result.. Before there was matter, there where two opposing harmonising, stable, forces that (became vibrations , sound , light) they existed as a whole ,a negative and a positive, a north and south, a push and a pull with equal force issuing stability in perfection.. something upset this causing rhythm, then causing these otherwise stable intertwined equal opposing forces to lose stability ,which in turn caused them to abrase and in this collision that double atom of matter came to life instantaneously being born into a pure energy environment, it was like an old brick inside a nuclear reactor. With this new formed Matter? came gravity, gravity then had an effect on these two waves/poles, now vibrations.. this started the chain reaction, and this release of energy ,disrupted the status quo, by causing vibrational collisions with in the space they existed at many times the speed of light.. each vibrational clash caused more matter of equal proportions, more gravity , more collisions , creating more each time halving like a virus and doubling the size of the ALL as it went. In much the same way two extremely flammable agents , hydrogen and oxygen can come together and create the very thing to put out that fire.. two gasses can make a liquid therefore two vibrations can make matter.. REPLICATION at an uncalculatable speed causing time to begin as in the first instance of a thing moving it had to take time to get to its "B" position from its "A" start point. if we take the speed of light and make an equation that shows 2,op forces clashing and producing two atoms that cause all(+-)= 2atoms x gravity x speed of light = 4 atoms + gravity+ speed of light = 8 atoms+ gravity+ speed of light 1xgravity we see all=(+ -) (+ )x speed of light +( - )x speed of light= vibration/clash.. causing separation, atom splits. 2x(-)+2x(+)= 2 atoms/matter expanding into the smaller "ALL" AS IT FIRST EXISTED. this was expanded at 2x speed of light each shock wave was then re-boosted by each subsequent shock wave of every individual atom that was born and then collided and split think about a balloon being filled by a single air source then having a double air force connected , then each of these air sources then doubling and this went on and on, think about the speed of the expansion (rate of growth) and how that would differ from the original collision. eventually a big bang would happen and everything would be born until these atoms got far enough away that they would just exist as matter and the librarian of the elements ..from which all things came.. by back tracking if we could quantify a body planets in the heavens say our solar system and creating a ratio of mass to area covered we could work out something that if applied to our furthers detected place in the cosmos we could calculate the mass of what is known in the given known area with a decent amount of accuracy and perhaps calculate a lot of other things. if we take a cubic mile as 4168181825440 litres and the earth is @260billion cubic miles . Then the total volume of water that the earth is would be cubic litres per mile times cubic miles per earth (C L M) X(C M E) OR FOUR TRILLION, ONEHUNDRED AND SIXTY EIGHT BILLION, ONE HUNDRED AND EIGHTY ONE MILLION, EIGHT HUNDRED AND TWENTY FIVE THOUSAND, FOUR HUNDRED AND FORTY, MULTIPLIED BY TWO HUNDRED AND SXTY BILLION. THE ANSWER BECOMES: AS FOLLOWS. ONE SEPTILLION, EIGHTY THREE SEXTILLION, SEVEN HUNDRED AND TWENTYSEVEN QUINTILLION, TWOHUNDRED AND SEVENTYFOUR QUADRILLION, SIX HUNDED AND FOURTEEN TRILLION FOUR HUNDRED BILLION LITRES OF MASS. If we then go in reverse and square route down each time like those viruses on a petri dish in reverse. rounding of the calculation to 1.84 septillion then the square route is one trillion three hundred and fifty six billion, four hundred and sixty-five million, nine hundred and ninety six thousand, six hundred and twenty five point zero five four seven litres., then we round off again making it 1.36 trillion litres, and then finding square route of this giving us that second retraction of all to wards point ALL=(+-). THIS NUMBER THEN BECOMES . one million one hundred and sixty six thousand ,one hundred and ninety point three seven eight nine seven. litres Taking the next retraction down this collapsing chain by then again finding the square route, we get to a figure of one thousand and seventy nine point nine zero three we repeat again for retraction number 5 down to thirty two point eight six two and again retraction 6 it goes down to five points even three three and again retraction7 it goes down to two point three nine four and again retraction 8 it goes down to one point eight four two and again retraction 9 it goes down to one point three five seven and again retraction 10 it goes down to one point one six five and again retraction 11 it goes down to one point zero seven nine and gain retraction 12 it goes down to one point zero three nine and again retraction 13 it goes down to one point zero one nine and again retraction 14 it goes down to one point zero zero nine and again retraction 15 it goes down to one point zero zero four and again retraction 16 goes down to one point zero zero two and again retraction 17 goes down to one point zero zero one and to the beginning it goes down to not one but " The ALL" this tells us that that an earths size mass if replicating only at the speed of light would have been achieved in 18 separate little shock waves or vibrations that grew like the mass at the same speed as lets face it the mass had to be in a space or a reality, the" ALL" set. when it initially had created itself to the volume of 1 litre there are eight octillion twenty-four septillion atoms in a litre taking the reverse at same rate first square route is as follow eighty nine trillion five hundred and seventy six billion seven hundred and eighty two million seven hundred and six thousand two hundred and thirty four point seven That's down one retraction. So retraction 1 Retraction two on this decline following the same square route rule . again that's it down to , nine million four hundred and sixty four thousand five hundred and thirty five point eight nine. and again retraction 2 Brings the figure down to, three thousand and seventy six point four four nine and again retraction 3 Brings the figure down to, fifty five point four six six and again retraction 4 brings the figure down to , seven point four four eight and again retraction 5 brings the figure down to, two point seven two nine and again retraction 6 brings it down to one point six seven and again retraction 7 brings this figure down to is one point two nine two and again retraction 8 brings figure down to one point one three seven and again retraction9 brings this figure down to one point zero six six and again retraction 10 brings this figure down to one point zero three two and again retraction 11 brings this figure down to one point zero one six and again retraction 12 brings this down to one point zero zero eight and again retraction13 brings this figure down to one point zero zero four and again retraction 14 brings this figure down to one point zero zero two and again retraction 15 brings it down to one point zero zero one and again the retraction 16 brings it down to one point zero zero . so its given that one atom doubled through 16 times to create a litre in volume and then a further 18 consecutive doublings to get to earth size, , and at the speed of light that multiplied as the mass got bigger. And the forces also grew. THIS MUST HAVE BEEN THE SITE TO BEHOLD EVERYTHING EVERYWHERE ALL AT ONCE... MASS GAS AND ENERGY .MASS= STORED ENERGY we only have to take a look at the devastation that the Hiroshima/Nagasaki BOMBS UNLEASED AS PER THE TOTAL MASS OF ATOMIC FUEL USED. and one would be dumb struck at visualizing this in the minds eye.

 

(First heard here  as an original concept).. hey im not a scientist, im just an Auto mech from Northern Ireland               

and would love this stated,debated or debunked !

 

The world is changing

 

[pzkpfw]

Wow, all one paragraph.

[FRAGMASTER2023]

yeah i know, science wasn't my strong point. didn't know wither to split it up and confuse, or leave it on one track, bit like the standard model of science really. hey its how it comes to me. . i see it i scribble it down.. now if i posted these scribbles up there might be a problem. i have to decipher them a few times before i get to this point. and can i say whao!!! another great answer : )

[Bufofrog]

9 hours ago, FRAGMASTER2023 said:

yeah i know, science wasn't my strong point.

Clearly not.

If you are interested in science this is a great place to ask questions to further your understanding.

Making things up based on limited knowledge is a waste of your time.

[Phi for All]

!

Moderator Note

Moved to Speculations. We want to see some evidence that supports your concepts and led to your conclusions. Break it down in pieces so we can analyze that based on what we observe in nature.

For instance, energy is a property of a thing, not a thing itself, so it can't be created or destroyed. Instead the thing the energy is a property of is changed into a different form, so "ENERGY CREATED" is NOT what's happening. Does your idea still hold up knowing this?

 

[swansont]

13 hours ago, FRAGMASTER2023 said:

The big bang did not start with the explosion of a single ATOM of matter alone.

No competent scientist claims that this is the case. 

Anyway, please review the guidelines for posting in speculations

 

[MigL]

On the other hand, my front wheel bearing is getting noisy.
Any 'theories' on the easiest way to knock out the bearing ?

But seriously, the only part of your post I'll agree with is that 'prior to the Big Bang and inflation,the universe may have existed in a razor's edge equilibrium for a very long time, depending, of course, on how one measures time in a universe where there is no time yet.
The Big Bang was the disruption of that equilibrium.

[FRAGMASTER2023]

On 5/6/2023 at 5:36 PM, MigL said:

On the other hand, my front wheel bearing is getting noisy.
Any 'theories' on the easiest way to knock out the bearing ?

But seriously, the only part of your post I'll agree with is that 'prior to the Big Bang and inflation,the universe may have existed in a razor's edge equilibrium for a very long time, depending, of course, on how one measures time in a universe where there is no time yet.
The Big Bang was the disruption of that equilibrium.

Its not for agreement its a theory based on information known and received .. set in a time line and then constructed into a flowing running   theoretical on the evolution of all things..   the half of something is always something and never nothing.. therefore as i came from something . i rolling piece of mass/matter or unknown size and form must also be in me ,you and everyone or thing,, correct? . i believe in the plus minus in the beginning . that was the "ALL" containing the + and the -  they produced the magnetic particle and set of a chain reaction or explosion, growth and expansion,, the figures i wrote are correct based on information readily available on the internet , i calculated  for the speed and mass growth ,using them...  the other factors like speed change, atoms crushing and splitting under force as they are produced in a place that only a micro fraction of a second before only housed an entity have the size or the next two i have a question for you then if you could care to help me out and i do appreciate anything that i learn from my peers,  this question is and anyone please feel free to help me with answers and understanding..

if an entity / mass , gas whatever is inside a room  perhaps visualise a glass cube that was filled with liquid completely and sealed, no air space completely full like two vibrational waves1- and 1+ where a force and they vibrated and caused a particle/ atom of matter between them,,

what would happen if this cube then had to suddenly endure the pain of holding another complete cubes worth identical in size ? id say it would explode...  what-s your thought?

so say it explodes   . but if the cube instantly grew by itself in size ?:       these two waved move outwards and so begins time,, something has moved form point A to point B within this set of "ALL"  now as outside this place does not exist there is no place for it to go but as matter has now appeared into this originally sterile environment  then the rule that every thing that exists has to have somewhere to exist , so as the need for it to grow repeats so does the need to contain it , you cant have a magnet with only south  and another with only north. one cannot exist without the other being with it to show difference... something cannot exist without another item to have comparison  a man/male cannot replicate without a female.. there is no such thing either as a being that is all male  or a female that is all female taking that a wee bit further....

so if then vibration cause matter caused crushed atom caused explosion caused more movement .vibration  caused more matter twice original size, then this is in a chain reaction is it not??? what has happened here is matter has been created, time begins, magnetism is created and so is gravity, Gravity id the residual magnetism that happened when the two waves plus and minus connected , and produced the matter,, this matter then absorbed a apart of this original magnetic matter , this matter .that all things came from and for ever,, that is why all mass has gravity.. its residual original electromagnetism and the lasting effect on matter.. TELL ME IM NOT THE ORIGINAL FATHER OF THIS THEORY PLEASE!.. surely this is already a thing right?.. so if you can see the pattern of existence as i do where am i wrong? because im only stating known things about something needing to be somewhere or it cannot be/exist. something has to have a companion or it cant exist, and when something exists in a containment and is needing to accommodate another of its self , then they collectively need a bigger place .. and it two things are forced into a space half its side it will implode/crush, causing force and shaking/vibration.. and it vibration caused matter in the first instance then its now causing more on each atom of matter so the growth rate is x2 each time as the crushing force is uniform and all at once, no atom of matter is protected the chain reaction is in motion.. when movement happened , time existed, with explosion there is light,, with mass and an electric charge around this mass we have a magnet , with magnetism we have magnetic transference under immeasurable force, causing residual magnetism now called gravity on that mass.. please highlight my misunderstandings and provide alternatives for my problem areas for me to absorb and combine.. in my quest for understanding ..THE ALL.

 

(First heard here  as an original concept).. hey im not a scientist, im just an Auto mech from Northern Ireland               

and would love this stated,debated or debunked !

 

The world is changing

[Genady]

This style of writing from an intelligent person is painfully familiar to me.

[FRAGMASTER2023]

On 5/6/2023 at 3:55 PM, Phi for All said:

!

Moderator Note

Moved to Speculations. We want to see some evidence that supports your concepts and led to your conclusions. Break it down in pieces so we can analyze that based on what we observe in nature.

For instance, energy is a property of a thing, not a thing itself, so it can't be created or destroyed. Instead the thing the energy is a property of is changed into a different form, so "ENERGY CREATED" is NOT what's happening. Does your idea still hold up knowing this?

 

perhaps i write from the tongue and as its sporadic perhaps i make little mistakes in your eyes,, yes you are correct in saying energy is a property of something and not it ,in your world of science,, that's only emitted or transferrable energy like a battery a radio sound light, and the likes  . did you know  energy is produce form a state change in matter and or movement first thus a need or a calling for energy" ( like a magnet... + and - one calls for and the other gives out relevant to other poles on other magnets  push and pull need give) to actually move and then by friction and heat etc of that matter .. or am i wrong? matter causes friction casing energy, split the atom unleash the energy  . its stored in matter form., in fact energy is as much a part of matter and not a property as that same matter could not exist without the energy - and + vibrated caused mater caused movement caused time caused energy movement and friction cause energy and need for energy .. either way they cannot exist without each other is what i see.

[swansont]

14 minutes ago, FRAGMASTER2023 said:

or am i wrong?

!

Moderator Note

Yes.

It looks to me like you are 0 for 6 in following the guidelines I linked to. Stream of consciousness posting really doesn’t cut it. Some rigor is required.

 

[FRAGMASTER2023]

On 5/6/2023 at 5:36 PM, MigL said:

On the other hand, my front wheel bearing is getting noisy.
Any 'theories' on the easiest way to knock out the bearing ?

But seriously, the only part of your post I'll agree with is that 'prior to the Big Bang and inflation,the universe may have existed in a razor's edge equilibrium for a very long time, depending, of course, on how one measures time in a universe where there is no time yet.
The Big Bang was the disruption of that equilibrium.

i'm glad that you took the time to read and somewhat agree, thank you for that ,because this was not a thing i was taught or ever heard from another human being, i visioned this in a semi awake dream and ran to my laptop to type up before it left me. when this stable equilibrium as you so rightly name, i just saw it as negative and positive in that Goldie locks position of just on the edge of arcing out but not, and held by electro magnetism until they did and matter came to be . electron nuclei whatever not my field.. but these where birthed in that instance a mini little stable equilibrium in a space where no space was, crushing in that newly expanded place, creating movement and thus time, form movement and in the coupling created light(spark) heat and energy, as like when we cross a batteries terminals we get this as we know..  so what ever was created in this instance this mini equilibrium was forced to short out again thus creating a second one in a space created for only the previous creation. crushing these two yet again , making 4 and so on and so on?, could you help me with what part of this theory  firstly . as i only see it as a logical follow up to that balance being upset in the original instance.. its a repeat of the first over and over... any reply would be gratefully appreciated.. and thanks again. its all  about understanding why i saw this for me

On 5/8/2023 at 1:49 AM, Genady said:

This style of writing from an intelligent person is painfully familiar to me.

lol