Jafar Posted May 30, 2023 Posted May 30, 2023 Potential truth behind aphantasia I propose that the development of aphantasia, characterized by the inability to form mental images, is influenced by one's early upbringing and experiences. I suggest that the absence of mental imagery is a result of specific factors during the formative years, such as the dominant sensory modality relied upon and individual cognitive tendencies. For instance, individuals who heavily rely on visual stimuli during their upbringing may be more inclined to engage in visual imagination. In contrast, those who heavily rely on auditory input may naturally lean towards an auditory-focused monologue. This preference or bias in mental processes can potentially be influenced by various factors, including early experiences, upbringing, and individual cognitive tendencies. To test the validity of this theory, I propose conducting an experiment with two groups of individuals who would undergo a monitored upbringing. The goal would be to expose one group to a higher amount of visual input, while the other group receives a higher amount of auditory input.
Jafar Posted May 30, 2023 Author Posted May 30, 2023 While I acknowledge the possibility of genetic factors contributing to aphantasia, my primary focus has been on exploring its psychological aspects. This theory is based on personal experiences and observations. Through my observations, I have noticed that my predominant mode of thought is a monologue. However, I have also observed instances when I can access and control imagery abilities, particularly during periods of altered consciousness or when I am in a state of reduced awareness.
Genady Posted May 30, 2023 Posted May 30, 2023 1 hour ago, Jafar said: to expose one group to a higher amount of visual input, while the other group receives a higher amount of auditory input. Assuming this has been done, how do you measure the results?
Jafar Posted May 31, 2023 Author Posted May 31, 2023 Due to the lack of resources and time, I have been unable to carry out this experiment. Consequently, I shared the theory here in order to gather additional input and insights.
Genady Posted May 31, 2023 Posted May 31, 2023 3 hours ago, Jafar said: Due to the lack of resources and time, I have been unable to carry out this experiment. Consequently, I shared the theory here in order to gather additional input and insights. Which resources and time do you need?
Jafar Posted May 31, 2023 Author Posted May 31, 2023 As a college student with three years left, it's unlikely I have time for experiments. I'd also need funding for expenses and additional researchers. Finding a sufficient number of infants and willing parents would take time. The experiment itself would require a significant timeframe for meaningful results. Therefore, I can only offer my opinion on this matter.
Phi for All Posted May 31, 2023 Posted May 31, 2023 17 hours ago, Jafar said: This theory is based on personal experiences and observations. Yuk! I think you need to refocus. Basing any hypothesis (what you have is NOT a theory) on observing yourself is very risky. Your own biases need to be compensated for, and that's not something you can do well on your own, by definition.
Mordred Posted June 1, 2023 Posted June 1, 2023 (edited) 12 hours ago, Jafar said: As a college student with three years left, it's unlikely I have time for experiments. I'd also need funding for expenses and additional researchers. Finding a sufficient number of infants and willing parents would take time. The experiment itself would require a significant timeframe for meaningful results. Therefore, I can only offer my opinion on this matter. Assuming this is for college research. You may be able to contact any local research programs on aphantasia. Many organizations are willing to aid students on a given study as it helps raise awareness... If so you may be able to get a hold of other researches that you can find correlations supporting and countering your theorem on a statistical weighted averaging basis. Keep in mind that the steps taken in a given research is often more important than the actual results. An instructor usually considers the steps taken to validate or invalidate a given research as the priori of importance rather than the results. In essence the preliminary steps needed to meet funding proposals for further research. Funding is never given without preliminary research and relevant studies Edited June 1, 2023 by Mordred
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now