StringJunky Posted August 2, 2023 Posted August 2, 2023 (edited) Mine are: Aljazeera, BBC, Reuters, The Intercept, Kyiv Post, Institute for the Study of War, Moscow Times, UK Defence Journal, Associated Press and Politico. I like to try and get varied perspectives as seen from different countries on similar subjects that interest me. I have noted that AP and ISoW are cited by the others listed quite a lot. Edited August 2, 2023 by StringJunky
exchemist Posted August 2, 2023 Posted August 2, 2023 56 minutes ago, StringJunky said: Mine are: Aljazeera, BBC, Reuters, The Intercept, Kyiv Post, Institute for the Study of War, Moscow Times, UK Defence Journal, Associated Press and Politico. I like to try and get varied perspectives as seen from different countries on similar subjects that interest me. I have noted that AP and ISoW are cited by the others listed quite a lot. Financial Times, BBC, Guardian, Reuters, mainly. I also check Independent, Brexograph (headlines only, to see what the Swivel-Eyes are thinking, or being told to think ) and the Spectator and New Statesman for commentary. And others from time to time on specific topics, e.g. Forbes, Business Insider, New Scientist, Nature publications etc. 1
TheVat Posted August 2, 2023 Posted August 2, 2023 I try to have some variety, too. Reuters, Guardian, LA Times, Washington Post, AP News, Daily Kos, Vice News (for its "underreported stories" emphasis), Politico, National Review (has retained a few conservatives with the capacity for independent thought), BBC, National Public Radio (US), and The Atlantic. And of course Journal of Toenail Fungus for its guest editorials by deposed dictators, unique perspectives I can find nowhere else. 1
exchemist Posted August 2, 2023 Posted August 2, 2023 1 hour ago, TheVat said: I try to have some variety, too. Reuters, Guardian, LA Times, Washington Post, AP News, Daily Kos, Vice News (for its "underreported stories" emphasis), Politico, National Review (has retained a few conservatives with the capacity for independent thought), BBC, National Public Radio (US), and The Atlantic. And of course Journal of Toenail Fungus for its guest editorials by deposed dictators, unique perspectives I can find nowhere else. Oh I go to the National Lubricating Grease Institute Spokesman for that: https://www.nlgi.org/nlgi-spokesman/ 1
Phi for All Posted August 2, 2023 Posted August 2, 2023 1 hour ago, exchemist said: Oh I go to the National Lubricating Grease Institute Spokesman for that: https://www.nlgi.org/nlgi-spokesman/ I browse the AGMA (American Guild of Musical Artists) newsletter for my politics. Congress loves to give the citizens a big song and dance. 1
Peterkin Posted August 2, 2023 Posted August 2, 2023 I don't follow the news very closely anymore. Primary source for Canadian and world news is CBC. If I want to follow to follow up a particular event or topic, I seek out the reliable on-line sources that are most knowledgeable on the topic, and that still let me. I also read most of Gwynn Deyer's colomns. Previously, when I was both more interested and had satellite tv, I watched PBS NewsHour and TVO's The Agenda regularly and several late-night talk shows and weekend newsmagazines. I still sometimes look in on them on You Tube. 1
Genady Posted August 2, 2023 Posted August 2, 2023 This quote only needs a small 100-year update: Quote If you have a care for your digestion, my advice is: avoid the subjects of Bolshevism and medicine at the dinner-table. And whatever you do, don't read the Soviet newspapers before dinner. 1
Genady Posted August 2, 2023 Posted August 2, 2023 1 hour ago, Genady said: This quote only needs a small 100-year update: The part two of that quote is: Quote 'M'mm . . . But there are no other newspapers.' 'In that case don't read any at all. Do you know I once made thirty tests in my clinic. And what do you think? The patients who never read newspapers felt excellent. Those whom I specially made read Pravda all lost weight. 1
TheVat Posted August 2, 2023 Posted August 2, 2023 Bulgakov? I had only heard part of the quote, about Soviet newspapers before dinner. It remains fresh advice, yes. 3 hours ago, exchemist said: Oh I go to the National Lubricating Grease Institute Spokesman for that: https://www.nlgi.org/nlgi-spokesman/ I have heard their annual flagpole climbing contest is quite the spectacle. 1
Genady Posted August 2, 2023 Posted August 2, 2023 14 minutes ago, TheVat said: Bulgakov? I had only heard part of the quote, about Soviet newspapers before dinner. It remains fresh advice, yes. Bravo. +1. Yes, it does
Peterkin Posted August 2, 2023 Posted August 2, 2023 Ah! At last, a foolproof weight-loss regimen! (Can I propose FUX news for the western version?) 1
OldChemE Posted August 3, 2023 Posted August 3, 2023 AP and BBC mainly, occasionally Reuters. Also SCOTUS Blog. I particularly like BBC News for American news, as they don't seem to have as much of a vested interest in putting a spin on the news.
toucana Posted August 5, 2023 Posted August 5, 2023 Quote One of my special favourites was Nuntii Latini - a news website in classical Latin run by the Finnish radio broadcaster YLE. Sadly they shut down about 4 years ago (as noted in this BBC article) https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/blogs-news-from-elsewhere-48661183 Quite apart from the fun of reading news headlines in Latin that could have come straight off the pages of Julius Caesar e.g. "Naval forces set sail to combat pirates off the coast of Africa", you often found topical news stories from Finland that weren't covered anywhere else.
npts2020 Posted August 6, 2023 Posted August 6, 2023 Mostly C-Span but when I need to know what I am supposed be upset about on a given day; PBS, local tv or once in a while fox, AP, Reuters, Deutsche Welles, BBC or RTV.
toucana Posted August 6, 2023 Posted August 6, 2023 On 8/2/2023 at 8:59 PM, Genady said: If you have a care for your digestion, my advice is: avoid the subjects of Bolshevism and medicine at the dinner-table. And whatever you do, don't read the Soviet newspapers before dinner. Back in the days of the Soviet Union, there were only two official newspapers available for reading. One was called Pravda ( Правда - ‘Truth’) - the official newspaper of the Soviet Communist Party, and the other was called Izvestia (Известия - ‘The News’) which was the organ of the Supreme Soviet. A popular salt-mine joke was that ”There is no Pravda in Izvestia, and no Izvestia in Pravda”.
StringJunky Posted August 7, 2023 Author Posted August 7, 2023 When anyone puts 'Truth' in a name, you know they are lying. Trump's Truth Social site comes to mind.
iNow Posted August 7, 2023 Posted August 7, 2023 2 minutes ago, StringJunky said: When anyone puts 'Truth' in a name, you know they are lying. Trump's Truth Social site comes to mind. I’m gonna re-truth this rn! 1
Genady Posted August 7, 2023 Posted August 7, 2023 13 minutes ago, toucana said: Back in the days of the Soviet Union, there were only two official newspapers available for reading. There were more than two. About half dozen central ones, and many regional, professional, special interest etc. A representative, albeit partial list can be found here: Printed media in the Soviet Union - Wikipedia
StringJunky Posted August 7, 2023 Author Posted August 7, 2023 2 minutes ago, Genady said: There were more than two. About half dozen central ones, and many regional, professional, special interest etc. A representative, albeit partial list can be found here: Printed media in the Soviet Union - Wikipedia The two mentioned were the ones often cited in UK papers iirc.
Genady Posted August 7, 2023 Posted August 7, 2023 6 minutes ago, StringJunky said: The two mentioned were the ones often cited in UK papers iirc. They were the two most circulated and subscribed to, mainly because people were often forced to subscribe to them. They were not most read though. But they were most used as substitution for non-exist toilet paper.
StringJunky Posted August 7, 2023 Author Posted August 7, 2023 2 minutes ago, Genady said: They were the two most circulated and subscribed to, mainly because people were often forced to subscribe to them. They were not most read though. But they were most used as substitution for non-exist toilet paper. Izal toilet paper was just as bad in the British public toilets.
Genady Posted August 7, 2023 Posted August 7, 2023 5 minutes ago, StringJunky said: Izal toilet paper was just as bad in the British public toilets. But we could wipe ourselves with Brezhnev portrait any time. 1
exchemist Posted August 7, 2023 Posted August 7, 2023 4 hours ago, StringJunky said: When anyone puts 'Truth' in a name, you know they are lying. Trump's Truth Social site comes to mind. Quite. Also often the case with “People’s” and “Democratic”, as in People’s Republic of China or German Democratic Republic. 1
Sensei Posted August 7, 2023 Posted August 7, 2023 8 hours ago, toucana said: Back in the days of the Soviet Union, there were only two official newspapers available for reading. One was called Pravda ( Правда - ‘Truth’) - the official newspaper of the Soviet Communist Party, and the other was called Izvestia (Известия - ‘The News’) which was the organ of the Supreme Soviet. A popular salt-mine joke was that ”There is no Pravda in Izvestia, and no Izvestia in Pravda”. @StringJunky ...they rebranded McDonald's in Russia in 2022, to "Tasty, period".. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vkusno_i_tochka 1
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now