arkain101 Posted September 22, 2005 Share Posted September 22, 2005 I have been reading around that there is still not a for sure explanation of the shape or kind of dimension the universe exists within. If I you back to the beginning where they claim all material was contained in one large ball so to speak. I would assume the mass would be beyond comprehension, also the size would be alot smaller than expected. The rotation of the of the object would be sickening fast, where the g-forces would be very close to the actual gravity holding the object together. When and if this bang occured it would of origanated from an intensly spinning object probably not even round but more of a oblong disc. When the material explodes and begins to let go the material would for the most part get thrown out at a spiraling horizontal plain shape. Hence the shape of the universe would follow from there. I know this is a hugely blind assumption. But logically this would be more or less the expected outcome. As for the accelerating and expanding universe thoery. The expanding part would make perfect sense if this is how things origanated but for the accelerating part, I really dont know if that is correct.. I mean science is not always right the first time and who are we to say we understand anything about the universe that is concrete. It could appear to be accelerating because of deformations of the light. It is impossible to tell what anything looks like currently when it is so far away. the light can take so long to get here and what you see is so far into the past. Also, if this is an accelerating and expanding universe eventually things could in theory reach the speed of light, god forbid, and if so some of the light from the surrounding universe would not be able to keep up to you. Although the theory of special relativity states that light is always the same speed to the observer regardless of there velocity or reference point, which would break the rule of C being the speed limit. If it is constantly accelerating then what is going to make it stop.. if the force can cause the entire universe to accelerate away from itself then that force would surely be able to cause it to reach and exceed the speed of C. If something appears to be acclerating with by watching it with light it is very possibl that it could actually be deaccelerating, causeing the "theoretical clock" on the light to speed up as things actually slow down. (remember the fast moving bodies seem to have a slow moving clock, so an accelerating object near speed of C would have a de-accelerating clock). A deacclerating universe would possibly have a speeding up of the light.. Which would give the appearence that it is accelerating but in fact the light in the data is only coming more quickly at us. So it would seem to me that for the most part the universe would look alot like an expanding ring. is it possible that the bang caused the ejected material to be our matter and the compressed inner core to become anti-matter or whatever it is that is called to cause the expansion of the universe. Just my quick assumption on the result of the big bang... I dont know if anyone has contemplated that or not. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now