Foster Posted August 28, 2023 Posted August 28, 2023 (edited) Global Warming (technology [cars etc.]) disrupted a well-synchronized ecosystem. The ecosystem includes atmosphere and ocean. This slowed down the earth's core, thus weakening the magnetic field & cutting apart the magnetosphere. The ozone layer isn't healing, but rather is collecting in pressure gradients across the globe (maybe?) Not gravity (pressure). such as teh beach. A distinctively different atmosphere can't focus out so many cosmic rays: weakened magnetic field & global warming. Therefore, (also because there's much less refraction than there would be) harsher wavelengths or radiation is hitting the ground (us). This would explain why it feels cool and is cool, but under the sun it's extremely different than it used to be. Another theory is that the use of electricity prevented an ongoing cohesive ecosystem. *example: alot of static electricity in the air or wavelengths crossing... prevented lightning strikes, thus no cloud formation or storms/weather. What do you think? (aside from how does global warming slow down the rotation of the earth) Edited August 28, 2023 by Foster insert [how bout this new theory i've considered? debunk please] -1
John Cuthber Posted August 28, 2023 Posted August 28, 2023 38 minutes ago, Foster said: What do you think? I think you should learn some science.
swansont Posted August 28, 2023 Posted August 28, 2023 1 hour ago, Foster said: Global Warming (technology [cars etc.]) disrupted a well-synchronized ecosystem. The ecosystem includes atmosphere and ocean. This slowed down the earth's core, thus weakening the magnetic field & cutting apart the magnetosphere. What’s the evidence that this is the case?
mistermack Posted August 28, 2023 Posted August 28, 2023 1 hour ago, studiot said: Surely this belongs in speculations ? A bit generous, surely ?
joigus Posted August 28, 2023 Posted August 28, 2023 2 hours ago, Foster said: debunk please] Can you "bunk" it first? It hasn't escaped my attention that you've used the word 'therefore' incorrectly three times since you've been here. 1
Foster Posted August 28, 2023 Author Posted August 28, 2023 (edited) 2 hours ago, swansont said: What’s the evidence that this is the case? There wouldn't be any evidence with something like the Sun, that occurs progressively, coinciding with our lifestyles. 1) we aren't questioning it 2) it isn't an apparent threat 3) it wouldn't be apparent 4) at night, the sun is down, which would allow us to forget. 6) there's no incentive for someone to look into something that cannot first be identified. We aren't going to question the world we can comfortably live in. The ecosystem cannot be quantified 100%, as been the obvious notion...since someone looked. I looked up the ozone molecules, and that would be impossible. I'm wrong there, admittedly. One other thing I'd like to bring up and ask you guys about, is why my parents Mercury thermometer broke in the late 90's. If we look into real-feel, and ambient temperature... I think that could lead to something. If it is indeed different, more, or less solar radiation penetrating our atmosphere, then we would want to know that it's safe. Edited August 28, 2023 by Foster -2
swansont Posted August 28, 2023 Posted August 28, 2023 49 minutes ago, Foster said: There wouldn't be any evidence with something like the Sun, that occurs progressively, coinciding with our lifestyles. 1) we aren't questioning it 2) it isn't an apparent threat 3) it wouldn't be apparent 4) at night, the sun is down, which would allow us to forget. 6) there's no incentive for someone to look into something that cannot first be identified. We aren't going to question the world we can comfortably live in. I’m sorry, have you met science? Science questions the world, makes models, and compares them to evidence. If you don’t have evidence, you aren’t doing science. And these are the requirements for speculations. So let’s have the evidence to support your claims, or this gets shut down.
mistermack Posted August 29, 2023 Posted August 29, 2023 12 hours ago, swansont said: I’m sorry, have you met science? Of course they have. That's where big words come from.
Bufofrog Posted August 29, 2023 Posted August 29, 2023 13 hours ago, Foster said: why my parents Mercury thermometer broke in the late 90's My guess is your dad dropped it and your mom accidentally stepped on it. They should have gotten a new one IMO.
Foster Posted August 29, 2023 Author Posted August 29, 2023 OKay, it goes in the trash. this place is for sociopaths anyway. have i met science? are you all retarded? Look at your comments. You are like Trump's offspring -1
pzkpfw Posted August 29, 2023 Posted August 29, 2023 Yikes. Right at the start of your OP you claimed: (A) Global Warming -> (B) disrupted ecosystem -> (C) slowed down the earth's core -> (D) weakening the magnetic field When asked for evidence you provided none, you waffled about how there'd be no evidence (or something like that). So you claimed something extremely wild (especially the B to C step) then provided nothing to back it up. That's what led to the "met science" comment, which was well justified.
swansont Posted August 30, 2023 Posted August 30, 2023 2 hours ago, Foster said: OKay, it goes in the trash. Yup. 2 hours ago, Foster said: this place is for sociopaths anyway. have i met science? are you all retarded? Look at your comments. You are like Trump's offspring Yeah, right. Making stuff up? Accuse others of what you’re doing? That’s the Trump playbook. 1
Recommended Posts