Experimental attempt to prove Photons/Electrons are 4D Torus shapes

[HawkII]

Quick recap; I believe that the interference pattern on the wall of a double slit experiment is the 2D cross section of a 4D Torus. And that when we observe this 2D cross section, it produces a 3D shadow. Just as any 4D shape would to a lower dimension observer

 

 

Spoiler

Experiment

 

This experiment pushes Mankind's intellect to the extreme. It is the equivalent of holding a Cube, to make out the shadow of the Cube it projects on a flat surface.

 

Quantum Hall effect experiment - Quantum Entanglement (The Freedman-Clauser experiment) - Double Slit Experiment

 

 

Step 1. Start the The Freedman-Clauser experiment. One Electron goes towards the Double slit experiment the other one goes towards the Quantum Hall effect experiment

Step 2. Activate the Quantum Hall effect experiment to change the orientation of the entagled electrons going through it

Step 3. Observe the interference pattern on the Double slit experiment

 

Predicted Outcome

 

The Interference pattern of the Double slit experiment will............. ROTATE

 

Edited September 26, 2023 by HawkII
Pictures

[HawkII]

To be honest, a big part of the reason I post these things, is so that if someone else comes up with it afterwards, I can say I came up with it to.

[HawkII]

 

Quote

The electron orbitals of the hydrogen atom describe the wave-like behavior of an electron in atom and they determine the probability to find it in a particular space region.

Seems familiar to a  Ditorus Cross section no?

[swansont]

50 minutes ago, HawkII said:

 

Seems familiar to a  Ditorus Cross section no?

As the quote says, electron orbitals tell you where you might find an electron, not their shape.

[HawkII]

Upon further research, I have found it is called a '4D Hyper Ditorus'

Just making that known as I found my own speculation thread on Google whilst looking into this.

Edited October 1, 2023 by HawkII

[Genady]

2 minutes ago, HawkII said:

I found my own speculation thread on Google whilst looking into this.

 

[swansont]

Any further thought on an experiment that would support your conjecture?

[TheVat]

On 9/29/2023 at 4:59 PM, HawkII said:

Seems familiar to a  Ditorus Cross section no?

What happens when the ditorus is stimulated?

[HawkII]

10 hours ago, swansont said:

Any further thought on an experiment that would support your conjecture?

I'm guessing you know the proposed experiment is in the first Post's 'Reveal hidden content' Spoiler. Turns out I meant to put 'Quantum Spin Hall effect' in there instead of 'Quantum Hall effect'

 

As any good Scientist would, I've been trying to think of things that would disprove instead of prove my conjecture. I thought of Atoms that have lots of Protons and Electrons. But to my astonishment, the Electron Orbitals all go through the middle of the Nucleus at different angles.

 

 

9 hours ago, TheVat said:

What happens when the ditorus is stimulated?

This topic is Stimulating enough

Edited October 2, 2023 by HawkII

[swansont]

4 hours ago, HawkII said:

I'm guessing you know the proposed experiment is in the first Post's 'Reveal hidden content' Spoiler. Turns out I meant to put 'Quantum Spin Hall effect' in there instead of 'Quantum Hall effect'

Not sure why you would use the spoiler feature, on that, but it doesn’t explain why that’s a predicted result. There really isn’t much about this that would let anyone else predict outcomes to support or reject the idea. 

4 hours ago, HawkII said:

As any good Scientist would, I've been trying to think of things that would disprove instead of prove my conjecture. I thought of Atoms that have lots of Protons and Electrons. But to my astonishment, the Electron Orbitals all go through the middle of the Nucleus at different angles.

The solutions to the Schrödinger equation are orthogonal to each other. A salient point to this is that there is a mathematical model involved, which allows for prediction and testing.

[HawkII]

1 hour ago, swansont said:

Not sure why you would use the spoiler feature, on that, but it doesn’t explain why that’s a predicted result. There really isn’t much about this that would let anyone else predict outcomes to support or reject the idea. 

The solutions to the Schrödinger equation are orthogonal to each other. A salient point to this is that there is a mathematical model involved, which allows for prediction and testing.

I got inspired by the Game show 'Takeshi's castle' when coming up with the combining all the Quantum experiments. Such an ambitious thing to do. You're right about it not providing enough information to let anyone else come up with alternatives. I was under the impression people wouldn't ask questions then say to themselves 'Let's see if this person's right. After all, to my knowledge no one has ever combined them before'

 

A better understanding of an existing mathematical model this would provide if true.

 

I've come up with a much simpler experiment that only needs the Double slit experiment apparatus. I'll have to use MS Paint to show its simplicity. So that will be my next Post on this Thread in the near future.

[HawkII]

Double slit experiment with a difference. Move the Photon/Electron emitter across.

 

Predicted outcome, the 'Interference wave pattern' would move across with the emitter. This to me would prove that it's actually moving the 4D Hyper Ditorus across

[swansont]

You don’t have a mathematical model to show what your idea predicts, and you have not shown what the mainstream model would predict.

 

[HawkII]

Ok. I'm done with this Thread now.

[HawkII]

I have found a new discovery which is the basis of the mathematical model

This! Is a Spectrum of visible light

Notice how Green is in the middle

'Greens are perceived more readily than any other color because of the combined color perception of rods and cones '

 

Now look how closely this resembles the Ditorus Cross section in the First Post.

 

'A mathematical model usually describes a system by a set of variables and a set of equations that establish relationships between the variables. '

My mathematical model is this.

 

 

 

You add a Prism to the Double Slit experiment.

 

I propose there would be a relationship between the variable of Observing to non observing. That equation would be the following_________ The colours would have the same amount of intensity when all added together.

 

 

 

Edit: According to me. Anti Electrons (Positrons) would be Mobius Strip shapes

Edited October 27, 2023 by HawkII

[swansont]

So where’s the math?

[HawkII]

15 hours ago, swansont said:

So where’s the math?

 

Quote

 

lux

 

It is measured in footcandles or lux – it is the amount of light (lumens) falling on a surface (over any given square foot or square meter). Therefore, light intensity is measured in terms of lumens per square foot (footcandles) or lumens per square meter (lux).

 

The left side of the equation (Non observed variable) will have the same amount of Lux as the other side of the equation (Observed variable) According to my experiment

[swansont]

As you had quoted, “A mathematical model usually describes a system by a set of variables and a set of equations that establish relationships between the variables”

You don’t have a model. There are no variables. This doesn’t fulfill our requirements