Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Who says we don't fight for it?

Do we not understand what it means and feels like for us personally?

Regardless of these answers, it's an issue of values and self-identity. Like terminates constructing a nest or huge mound, we shape the world around us in accordance with our genetic predispositions and needs of the society around us.

Just because not all "nests" and "mounds" are physical, tangible, or visible (freedom and love still exist as concepts even though I cannot touch and feel them, after all), that doesn't mean that we as biological organisms aren't still striving toward those shapes, patterns, and outcomes in our day to day behaviors.

We "fight" for freedom for the same reason we "fight" for food and shelter, it's just at a different layer of the hierarchy proposed by Maslow. 

Posted
38 minutes ago, iNow said:

Who says we don't fight for it?

Not me...

39 minutes ago, iNow said:

Do we not understand what it means and feels like for us personally?

I'm not sure, do we?

For instance, a prisoner with a death sentence, could be far more free than you; his last meal, perhaps...

Posted

As former HG peoples, we have a deeply felt need for mobility - any sense that we cannot move about freely (as is felt by, for example, most residents of Gaza) can arouse a trapped anxious feeling.  We have an instinctive grasp that prisons and prison-like states are places we do not want to be.  People cope with such conditions of confinement by finding interior freedoms to compensate.  You don't have to be Mandela to do that.  That was the point of some of the cruelties of Guantanamo, to try and deprive detainees even the freedom of their imaginations by blasting music at them, depriving them of sleep, etc.  

Posted
39 minutes ago, TheVat said:

As former HG peoples, we have a deeply felt need for mobility - any sense that we cannot move about freely (as is felt by, for example, most residents of Gaza) can arouse a trapped anxious feeling.  We have an instinctive grasp that prisons and prison-like states are places we do not want to be.  People cope with such conditions of confinement by finding interior freedoms to compensate.  You don't have to be Mandela to do that.  That was the point of some of the cruelties of Guantanamo, to try and deprive detainees even the freedom of their imaginations by blasting music at them, depriving them of sleep, etc.  

Indeed, it seems the more we understand freedom; the more we try to deprive it of other's...

Posted

So, why do we fight for a freedom we know we can't have? 

Because the lottery says "it might be you" and we'll give a little bit of our freedom to chase down that dream, until one day it says "it is you" and we'll finally understand...

Posted
4 minutes ago, dimreepr said:

why do we fight for a freedom we know we can't have? 

You assume we "know we can't have" freedom, and I reject that as specious to the point of defeatism. Hope springs eternal

Posted (edited)

 

On 10/10/2023 at 3:57 PM, TheVat said:

As former HG peoples, we have a deeply felt need for mobility - any sense that we cannot move about freely (as is felt by, for example, most residents of Gaza) can arouse a trapped anxious feeling.  We have an instinctive grasp that prisons and prison-like states are places we do not want to be.  People cope with such conditions of confinement by finding interior freedoms to compensate.  You don't have to be Mandela to do that.  That was the point of some of the cruelties of Guantanamo, to try and deprive detainees even the freedom of their imaginations by blasting music at them, depriving them of sleep, etc.  

If Gazans were spread out, they have about 150mof land each. It has one of the highest population densities in the world. I did a back of the envelope sum yesterday. Not all of that 140km2 will be habitable to hold the 2 million population. They have even less space now the high-rises are getting blown up. Compressing people like that can only perpetuate animosity.

Likud want to wipe out/evict Palestinians, so that they can realize their biblical colonial fantasy. This, I think, is their ultimate raison de etre and where their current actions are leading.

Philosophically, where one has peace of mind, I equate that with a proper sense of freedom.

Edited by StringJunky
removed redundant sentence I started but not finished
Posted (edited)
On 10/10/2023 at 10:47 AM, dimreepr said:

For instance, a prisoner with a death sentence, could be far more free than you; his last meal, perhaps...

Not unless he felt terribly guilty and would have committed suicide if others didn't kill him.

 

11 hours ago, dimreepr said:

So, why do we fight for a freedom we know we can't have? 

Because, if we really know that we cannot get free, we lie down and stop eating. The tiger pacing back and forth behind his bars still doesn't know that he can never escape: he's still holding on to a vestige of hope. So does a guerilla in occupied territory. Risking death is no big deal compared to accepting eternal captivity. 

 

1 hour ago, StringJunky said:

Philosophically, where one has peace of mind, I equate that with a proper sense of freedom.

I doubt most animals can have proper peace of mind in a prison. A few probably do, and stop fighting. That makes them suitable zoo exhibits, while the pacing tiger disturbs the visitors' peace of mind.

 

Edited by Peterkin
Posted (edited)
22 hours ago, iNow said:

You assume we "know we can't have" freedom, and I reject that as specious to the point of defeatism. Hope springs eternal

Good point, but what I'm assuming, in the OP, is that most of us don't understand what freedom is; hoping in this context is like buying a lottery ticket, even if you win you still haven't got it.

My point is, defeatism doesn't have to be a negative approach... 

11 hours ago, Peterkin said:

Not unless he felt terribly guilty and would have committed suicide if others didn't kill him.

I did say "could".

11 hours ago, Peterkin said:

Because, if we really know that we cannot get free, we lie down and stop eating. The tiger pacing back and forth behind his bars still doesn't know that he can never escape: he's still holding on to a vestige of hope. So does a guerilla in occupied territory. Risking death is no big deal compared to accepting eternal captivity. 

 

12 hours ago, StringJunky said:

Philosophically, where one has peace of mind, I equate that with a proper sense of freedom.

I doubt most animals can have proper peace of mind in a prison. A few probably do, and stop fighting. That makes them suitable zoo exhibits, while the pacing tiger disturbs the visitors' peace of mind.

That rather depends on the prison, not the prisoners... 

12 hours ago, StringJunky said:

Philosophically, where one has peace of mind, I equate that with a proper sense of freedom.

+1

Edited by dimreepr
Posted
1 hour ago, dimreepr said:

what I'm assuming, in the OP, is that most of us don't understand what freedom is

That's a mighty big assumption, and you know what they say about people who assume... asses, you's, and me's... 

 

1 hour ago, dimreepr said:

hoping in this context is like buying a lottery ticket, even if you win you still haven't got it.

Studies seem to suggest we gain more joy from the anticipation of the event or trip or vacation (from the "hoping" and "planning" and "considering in advance") than we gain from the experience itself (the winning and the doing/going, etc.).

It stands to reason that thinking of freedom and considering all the myriad ways we're already free may bring greater wellbeing than the freedom itself. 

The underlying concept is described as anticipatory joy. It's like a forward looking rumination, but with a positive emotional valance. 

Posted
1 hour ago, iNow said:

That's a mighty big assumption, and you know what they say about people who assume... asses, you's, and me's... 

 

Studies seem to suggest we gain more joy from the anticipation of the event or trip or vacation (from the "hoping" and "planning" and "considering in advance") than we gain from the experience itself (the winning and the doing/going, etc.).

It stands to reason that thinking of freedom and considering all the myriad ways we're already free may bring greater wellbeing than the freedom itself. 

The underlying concept is described as anticipatory joy. It's like a forward looking rumination, but with a positive emotional valance. 

The antipode of that is, how easily a holiday is spoiled by a soiled pillow...

Posted
10 hours ago, dimreepr said:

My point is, defeatism doesn't have to be a negative approach...

Right. If your cage is comfortable and your food-bowl always filled on time, who needs autonomy?

Posted
12 hours ago, Peterkin said:

Right. If your cage is comfortable and your food-bowl always filled on time, who needs autonomy?

What makes you think that cage isn't yours?

19 hours ago, iNow said:

ohh... kay... :confused:

It's all over social media and day time TV, my holiday (and therefore my entire year) was spoiled, because it didn't live up to the hype, created by 'them'; and I can never forgive 'them' unless they suffer as much as I imagined that I had.

  • 1 month later...
Posted

We fight for freedom because it's about expressing ourselves, making choices, and shaping our own paths. It's at the core of human dignity, giving us the power to pursue what makes us thrive, both as individuals and communities.

Posted
6 hours ago, LingNeutron said:

We fight for freedom because it's about expressing ourselves, making choices, and shaping our own paths. It's at the core of human dignity, giving us the power to pursue what makes us thrive, both as individuals and communities.

This is the matrix argument, humans inate sense of freedom would reject utopia on principal...

Not a very convincing argument, because when we take a poll; '8 out of 10 cat's' would prefer to be eating dinner, than fighting a war...

The other 2 cats can fight amongst themselves... 😉 

Posted
56 minutes ago, TammyK said:

When we enjoy the freedom to express ourselves, it opens up a world of possibilities. Likewise, when aiming to enhance our online presence, opting for high-quality backlinks can be a thoughtful strategic decision. 👍

Right! The best choice is knowing where to buy quality backlinks! Hahaha, we're on the same page, lolol~

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.