Jump to content

Did Loki's Eternal Sacrifice Really Out-way the Damage He Caused in Avengers?


Recommended Posts

Posted

It over-outweighed the damage he caused. And that is just a taste of the sacrifices Jesus made in just 33 years. Jesus never once did anything that was not a selfless act. Imagine that. We'll never see Loki again, and some people will still call him a loser. The truth remains he was a nobler God than Thor, in the end. And it's not where you start. 

Posted
29 minutes ago, Engineeer said:

It over-outweighed the damage he caused. And that is just a taste of the sacrifices Jesus made in just 33 years. Jesus never once did anything that was not a selfless act. Imagine that. We'll never see Loki again, and some people will still call him a loser. The truth remains he was a nobler God than Thor, in the end. And it's not where you start. 

1. I don’t see how Jesus is in any way connected to the movie.

2. Asserting that anyone “never once” did anything a ludicrous assertion when you don’t have a full record of their history, and when any given day is full of acts that simply don’t fit in the category. Is scratching an itch a selfless act? Coughing? Trimming one’s nails? Eating a meal? Going to the loo? Please spare us the hyperbole. 

Posted
5 hours ago, swansont said:

1. I don’t see how Jesus is in any way connected to the movie.

He's talking about the Loki series on Disney, still no sign of Jesus though.

 

Was pretty epic. Without spoiling anything, involves Yggdrasill and Ragnarok.

They haven't ruled out us seeing the character again. Could see him serving as a guide or similar in the future. Happy Tiw's Day everyone!

Posted (edited)
5 hours ago, swansont said:

Trimming one’s nails?

Depends on if it makes others more comfortable to be around oneself or not.

36 minutes ago, Endy0816 said:

Ragnarok

The erasing of alternate timelines preserved the main one so no. Loki gets imprisoned using his power to hold the branches of multiple timelines together. 

But he committed a few selfish acts

 

Edited by Engineeer
Posted
6 minutes ago, Engineeer said:

Depends on if it makes others more comfortable to be around oneself or not.

The erasing of alternate timelines preserved the main one so no

Kang's variants are still out there.

Consider what Renslayer comes across as well.

Posted
1 minute ago, Endy0816 said:

Kang's variants are still out there.

Consider what Renslayer comes across as well.

At the time that he was talking to Loki they were and one would end up in the main timeline

Some are of the mind that Loki was a shit quality character and got what he deserved. But that would a pessimistic attitude. 

 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.