Ertox Posted March 6 Share Posted March 6 Hello everyone, I'm new to the forum and I'm french so, sorry for the mistake! I'm doing a presentation on an internship in which I reduced an alkane to an alkyne. To do this, we used paladium on carbon with hydrogen gas. Unfortunately, I can't find anything on the internet about this... I "imagined" this shema on the assumption that it was the same as for alkenes, but it doesn't really seem professional. If anyone can help me, I'd really appreciate it. Thanks ! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
exchemist Posted March 6 Share Posted March 6 2 hours ago, Ertox said: Hello everyone, I'm new to the forum and I'm french so, sorry for the mistake! I'm doing a presentation on an internship in which I reduced an alkane to an alkyne. To do this, we used paladium on carbon with hydrogen gas. Unfortunately, I can't find anything on the internet about this... I "imagined" this shema on the assumption that it was the same as for alkenes, but it doesn't really seem professional. If anyone can help me, I'd really appreciate it. Thanks ! I would expect it to be the same mechanism, just in 2 stages, with an alkene as the intermediate step. In both alkynes and alkenes you have π-bonds which can bind to the metal surface. Kinetically, I imagine it may be a bit faster for alkynes, as they can approach in any orientation and still bind to the surface. There are descriptions of this on the internet. Here is one: https://www.masterorganicchemistry.com/2011/11/25/hydrogenation-alkenes-palladium-on-carbon-pdc/. This link suggests that alkynes are more readily reduced than alkenes. The only respect in which I think the mechanism you have drawn may not be quite right is that, according to my understanding, the alkyne or alkene itself binds to the metal via its π-bonds, whereas you have shown the molecule staying above the H atoms, rather than binding to the surface itself before reacting. (There is a diagram of the mechanism in the link.) 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chenbeier Posted March 6 Share Posted March 6 Its the opposit which I reduced an alkane to an alkyne. You reduce the alkyne to the Alkane. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ertox Posted March 6 Author Share Posted March 6 1 hour ago, exchemist said: I would expect it to be the same mechanism, just in 2 stages, with an alkene as the intermediate step. In both alkynes and alkenes you have π-bonds which can bind to the metal surface. Kinetically, I imagine it may be a bit faster for alkynes, as they can approach in any orientation and still bind to the surface. There are descriptions of this on the internet. Here is one: https://www.masterorganicchemistry.com/2011/11/25/hydrogenation-alkenes-palladium-on-carbon-pdc/. This link suggests that alkynes are more readily reduced than alkenes. The only respect in which I think the mechanism you have drawn may not be quite right is that, according to my understanding, the alkyne or alkene itself binds to the metal via its π-bonds, whereas you have shown the molecule staying above the H atoms, rather than binding to the surface itself before reacting. (There is a diagram of the mechanism in the link.) Thank you for your prompt reply it's much clearer now, I've redone the reaction shema. Have a nice day Sincerely Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
exchemist Posted March 6 Share Posted March 6 25 minutes ago, Ertox said: Thank you for your prompt reply it's much clearer now, I've redone the reaction shema. Have a nice day Sincerely Yes I think that looks better. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KJW Posted March 7 Share Posted March 7 Do you need to consider the stereochemistry of the hydrogenations? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ertox Posted March 8 Author Share Posted March 8 19 hours ago, KJW said: Do you need to consider the stereochemistry of the hydrogenations? No, I don't think I'll be looking into that. I'll just point out that the addition is cys. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now