MJ kihara Posted April 25 Posted April 25 This is a continuation of ideas that I have posted in this forum a while back with some mathematics and new outlook added to strengthen my arguments.for those not familiar with those ideas it's appropriate they revisit my previous posts in the forum since I will be using some information/diagrams from them,you will have to be patient with this thread. I will use the diagram above as a foundation of my arguments,since am not good at latex, mathematics to Back up the ideas, will be handwritten photos, after all math is math.
swansont Posted April 25 Posted April 25 1 hour ago, MJ kihara said: you will have to be patient with this thread. ! Moderator Note No, I don’t think we do. Your previous thread using this diagram was locked, and you were told not to bring it up again. You say you have math, so you get one chance here to post something that complies with the rules (some combination of a model, some falsifiable claim, evidence). We’re not going to have you string us along as before.
MJ kihara Posted April 26 Author Posted April 26 The equivalence of frequency let's term it Mj or Kihara equivalence....mmm... selfish... 😋. Pliz give the reason for a red tick,think about it is complicated without reasoning. -1
swansont Posted April 26 Posted April 26 There’s no suggestion of anything that’s testable in the context of some new model.
Recommended Posts