Jump to content

New drivetrain for bikes(?)


Recommended Posts

This is probably nothing more than a cool science fair experiment/project but i had an idea:
                                    Motor
                                        |
Pedals/Alternator -> Computer <-> Battery <-Regen brakes

I searched it up and even the best alternators are only about 80% efficient.
Any ideas on how i might improve on this design? 
 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 minutes ago, Scientific_potato said:

This is probably nothing more than a cool science fair experiment/project but i had an idea:
                                    Motor
                                        |
Pedals/Alternator -> Computer <-> Battery <-Regen brakes

I searched it up and even the best alternators are only about 80% efficient.
Any ideas on how i might improve on this design? 
 

You’ve left out the wheels.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Posted (edited)
17 minutes ago, Scientific_potato said:

Well yea, but it should be obvious that its part of it right?

At present you show 2 sources of mechanical power ( motor and pedals) and 2 sources of electricity( regen brakes - which by the way implies another generator and/or motor which is not mentioned - and a battery)  connected, not to the wheels, but to a computer. That makes no sense unless you want to fry its circuits. So far you are not describing a design or even a concept. 
 

Where is the motor? Is it in the hub of a wheel to drive it directly, or somewhere else? If the latter how is it connected to the powered wheel? Is the generator that provides the regen braking the same motor, or a different machine? And so on.

Edited by exchemist
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, exchemist said:

At present you show 2 sources of mechanical power ( motor and pedals) and 2 sources of electricity( regen brakes - which by the way implies another generator and/or motor which is not mentioned - and a battery)  connected, not to the wheels, but to a computer. That makes no sense unless you want to fry its circuits. So far you are not describing a design or even a concept. 

The computer is there to regulate/direct the electricity

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Scientific_potato said:

I honestly thought that if you had a computer specialized to do that you could just do it, or just connect it to a relay? 

Look, I’m sorry to seem harsh, but all you have done is propose a motor, a battery, pedals and some kind of unspecified regenerative braking, controlled, in some undefined way, by a computer. Do you really think saying just that is enough to constitute a design? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, exchemist said:

Look, I’m sorry to seem harsh, but all you have done is propose a motor, a battery, pedals and some kind of unspecified regenerative braking, controlled, in some undefined way, by a computer. Do you really think saying just that is enough to constitute a design? 

You're right, my apologies
i'd just like to mention that i have not gone to college or anything like that, its really just my hobby to learn things from discussions online.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Scientific_potato said:

You're right, my apologies
i'd just like to mention that i have not gone to college or anything like that, its really just my hobby to learn things from discussions online.

OK, then let’s pursue this a bit. Where is the motor, and will it also function as a regenerative brake?

Just looked on line and some bikes have regenerative braking: https://intermountainbikes.com/which-electric-bikes-have-regenerative-braking/

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, exchemist said:

OK, then let’s pursue this a bit. Where is the motor, and will it also function as a regenerative brake?

Just looked on line and some bikes have regenerative braking: https://intermountainbikes.com/which-electric-bikes-have-regenerative-braking/

The motor is connected to the rear wheel
Just to be clear, do you know those flashlights you can charge by cranking? the thing inside of that will be connected to the pedals.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Scientific_potato said:

The motor is connected to the rear wheel
Just to be clear, do you know those flashlights you can charge by cranking? the thing inside of that will be connected to the pedals.

OK so in your design there won’t be a chain between the pedals and the wheels, i.e. the whole transmission would be electric? That may be new. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, pzkpfw said:

These things exist.

 

 

Interesting. However I’d have thought, based on what I understand of diesel-electric traction, that this would incur significantly higher losses than a mechanical, i.e. chain or belt, drive. Perhaps with a battery, i.e. as a rechargeable hybrid, this could be overcome, but at the cost of needing to charge the battery periodically from an external source.

I don’t think I’m persuaded that this would be a great idea, though I must admit getting rid of the chain, with all its attendant problems, might be attractive. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Once you stick a battery in, then regenerative braking starts having value, so no more of your energy goes to making brake pads get hot.

Maybe then it's seen more as a battery driven bike, where your pedaling is a range extender?

I like the idea that (at the cost of more weight) this would make it possible to stick another motor in the front wheel - a 2 wheel drive bike? Maybe good in mud?

I don't have the skills to calculate which is best.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Though less efficient than direct drive the rider can pedal more efficiently. For example, on down hills with excess speed not only can regenerative braking be used but the rider can continue pedaling at average power output...uphill can be done at better speed than the rider could otherwise do while the rider continues pedaling, again at average/optimum output.

Don't forget to exchange batteries now and then with your super fit friend while you enjoy pedalling in each others company while both exercising optimally.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Nice points.

Probably also means on a tandem bike, both people can pedal to their ability, and are not locked by a chain into needing the same RPM.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, J.C.MacSwell said:

Though less efficient than direct drive the rider can pedal more efficiently. For example, on down hills with excess speed not only can regenerative braking be used but the rider can continue pedaling at average power output...uphill can be done at better speed than the rider could otherwise do while the rider continues pedaling, again at average/optimum output.

Don't forget to exchange batteries now and then with your super fit friend while you enjoy pedalling in each others company while both exercising optimally.

All valid points, but you will still expend considerably more energy (perhaps 30-40% more) on this machine to get from A to B than on a conventional bike, due to the combined transmission losses and the extra weight of motors, generator and battery.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, exchemist said:

All valid points, but you will still expend considerably more energy (perhaps 30-40% more) on this machine to get from A to B than on a conventional bike, due to the combined transmission losses and the extra weight of motors, generator and battery.

The weight might only increase 5% range when considering the rider and any cargo and not just the bike. Comparable to existing ebikes. Transmission losses would be mostly one way, maybe a few extra percent. 

That leaves generation and regeneration losses, and charging, discharging  and recharging losses (anything else?) vs regeneration recovery and more efficient pedalling overall. I 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, J.C.MacSwell said:

The weight might only increase 5% range when considering the rider and any cargo and not just the bike. Comparable to existing ebikes. Transmission losses would be mostly one way, maybe a few extra percent. 

That leaves generation and regeneration losses, and charging, discharging  and recharging losses (anything else?) vs regeneration recovery and more efficient pedalling overall. I 

Transmission losses for electric transmission will be nearer 20% I should think.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.