externo Posted June 26 Share Posted June 26 https://physicsdiscussionforum.org/viewtopic.php?p=28798#p28798 -2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
exchemist Posted June 26 Share Posted June 26 19 minutes ago, externo said: https://physicsdiscussionforum.org/viewtopic.php?p=28798#p28798 Er, what argument do you wish to make on this forum, then? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
externo Posted June 26 Author Share Posted June 26 (edited) 1 hour ago, exchemist said: Er, what argument do you wish to make on this forum, then? The speed of light is not isotropic in all inertial frames and the true physical transformations are Euclidean and not hyperbolic. This means that Einstein's isotropy hypothesis is invalidated and that Lorentz's theory is the only valid one. Edited June 26 by externo -1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
exchemist Posted June 26 Share Posted June 26 25 minutes ago, externo said: The speed of light is not isotropic in all inertial frames and the true physical transformations are Euclidean and not hyperbolic. This means that Einstein's isotropy hypothesis is invalidated and that Lorentz's theory is the only valid one. Haven’t you already done this? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
externo Posted June 26 Author Share Posted June 26 (edited) I remame this topic as : "Proof that Einstein Special Relativity is false because the one-way speed of light is not invariant. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/One-way_speed_of_light Edited June 26 by externo -1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
swansont Posted June 26 Share Posted June 26 ! Moderator Note Just linking to another discussion fails to comply with rule 2.7 You had a previous relativity discussion, which was closed, and were told not to re-introduce the topic. We’re not doing this again. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts