ahmet Posted July 1 Posted July 1 (edited) Hi, I mean whether we could interfere them via setting their amplitude and/or wavelenght quantities by functions' rules. for instance, are the amplitude or wavelength of waves' are settable in the conformity of f(x)= Ax +B (This is a general rule of linear function as you know) Thanks. Edited July 1 by ahmet
MigL Posted July 1 Posted July 1 Have you heard of 'noise cancelling' headphones ? They modify the sound waves coming into your ears by introducing more sounds which destructively interfere with the noise waves you want 'cancelled'.
ahmet Posted July 1 Author Posted July 1 5 minutes ago, MigL said: Have you heard of 'noise cancelling' headphones ? They modify the sound waves coming into your ears by introducing more sounds which destructively interfere with the noise waves you want 'cancelled'. Hello, I have not heard that term in meaning of developmental technology. But.. maybe I may predict what it was related... for instance, is that related to some other external contexts like: subliminal & supraliminal stimuli. But you are right that I definitely & specfically consider sound waves. Thank you for contribution. 7 minutes ago, MigL said: They modify the sound waves coming into your ears by introducing more sounds which destructively interfere with the noise waves you want 'cancelled'. no, I read once again and decided that this kind of thing was new to me.
swansont Posted July 1 Posted July 1 32 minutes ago, ahmet said: I mean whether we could interfere them via setting their amplitude and/or wavelenght quantities by functions' rules. Yes, we do interference with them in a controllable fashion. With sound, as MigL has offered; there are also examples of levitation with sound waves. We do diffraction and interference with light, and we make holograms.
ahmet Posted July 1 Author Posted July 1 (edited) Thank you very much. I feel myself very happy being corrected/confirmed about my prediction which I wrote in my paper but could not publish it. I shall try to revise and resubmit. Thanks again. Edited July 1 by ahmet 1
studiot Posted July 1 Posted July 1 1 hour ago, ahmet said: Thank you very much. I feel myself very happy being corrected/confirmed about my prediction which I wrote in my paper but could not publish it. I shall try to revise and resubmit. Thanks again. I'm glad to see you are taking a mathematical approach to this. One very important way we control waves is the ability to focus them. There is plenty of maths available covering this. This means that the spatial distribution of the wave is not the same in all directions. Another exploitable property of waves is resonance. Keep up the good work. +1
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now