Dear moderator

[graybear13]

I'm sorry.  I didn't mean to break any rules.  Just trying to help. 

Stephen said you have a measure of control over the higher levels if you secure the foundation.  I know you live and work in the higher levels and don't want to hear from someone in the sandbox, but from down here it looks like the hole thing is about to fall.  I implore you to at least consider a reboot: a paradigm shift that will secure the foundation and answer many questions.   

[exchemist]

39 minutes ago, graybear13 said:

I'm sorry.  I didn't mean to break any rules.  Just trying to help. 

Stephen said you have a measure of control over the higher levels if you secure the foundation.  I know you live and work in the higher levels and don't want to hear from someone in the sandbox, but from down here it looks like the hole thing is about to fall.  I implore you to at least consider a reboot: a paradigm shift that will secure the foundation and answer many questions.   

Sandbox or funny farm? A paradigm shift in which mathematics is treated as a “blind alley”, and in which we are exhorted to create vortices on top of pyramids to overcome gravity? Come off it. This is just barking mad.

[Phi for All]

55 minutes ago, graybear13 said:

I know you live and work in the higher levels and don't want to hear from someone in the sandbox, but from down here it looks like the hole thing is about to fall.

You have the kinds of fears that are helped by education. You don't have the kind of education to help you know what you don't know. Your gut tells you something is wrong, but it doesn't tell you that you're the problem, that it's wrong to make things up to fill the gaps in your knowledge. 

If you want to pursue your WAGs, there are plenty of discussion forums for you, but not here. The problem with them is that everyone is like you, convinced they've solved a problem science doesn't really have, so they tend not to really listen to other people's WAGs. 

If you want to pursue science, I suggest you take some science courses so the discussions here make more sense to you. You're not dumb, you can lean this stuff, but it's not always intuitive. You have to stick with it to see the predictive power of the methodology. You can't give up and start making up things that make more sense to you in your ignorance.

[MigL]

1 hour ago, graybear13 said:

secure the foundation and answer many questions

You are welcome to ask as many questions as you wish.

It is the continuing assertion of WAGs that keeps you playing in the 'sandbox'.
Learn something and join the adult discussion.

[Mordred]

It also helps to read over the guidelines in the Speculation forum in the locked threads at the top.

Simply posting assertions without any actual science doesn't help

Edited July 3 by Mordred

[swansont]

5 hours ago, graybear13 said:

I'm sorry.  I didn't mean to break any rules.  Just trying to help. 

Stephen said you have a measure of control over the higher levels if you secure the foundation.  I know you live and work in the higher levels and don't want to hear from someone in the sandbox, but from down here it looks like the hole thing is about to fall.  I implore you to at least consider a reboot: a paradigm shift that will secure the foundation and answer many questions.   

Who is Stephen?

”I don’t understand” is not an indication of problems with science.

[graybear13]

9 hours ago, swansont said:

Who is Stephen?

”I don’t understand” is not an indication of problems with science.

Stephen Hawking. I misspelled his first name in previous post.  I understand why math is a better way to communicate.  I guess my words are so ambiguous no one can understand or see what my projection looks like.