GioeleAntonello Posted July 26 Share Posted July 26 I would like to know how many worlds exist in nature, for example, our world is made up of organisms and materials. For me, worlds are made up of an environment and inhabitants. I tried to find larger and smaller worlds and these are what I found: 1 Particles Atoms 2 Molecules ? 2 DNA Nucleus 4 cells Organs 5 Organisms Materials 6 energies Globes 7 black holes galaxy Can you help me check and complete this list? :D Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheVat Posted July 26 Share Posted July 26 (edited) 35 minutes ago, GioeleAntonello said: would like to know how many worlds exist in nature, for example, our world is made up of organisms and materials. Possibly "world" is not the term, but rather scale. In science it is common to speak of three scales: macro, micro, and nano. While there are finer levels of analysis in each of those categories, and one could certainly add "cosmic" at the top of macro, those three are the main ones as far as I can tell. Though I imagine some astronomers and astrophysicists would view cosmic as fully its own scale, given the phenomena that manifest only at that level (or can only be understood at that level). Edited July 26 by TheVat Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GioeleAntonello Posted July 26 Author Share Posted July 26 4 minutes ago, TheVat said: Possibly "world" is not the term, but rather scale. In science it is common to speak of three scales: macro, micro, and nano. While there are finer levels of analysis in each of those categories, and one could certainly add "cosmic" at the top of macro, those three are the main ones as far as I can tell. Though I imagine some astronomers and astrophysicists would view cosmic as fully its own scale, given the phenomena that manifest only at that level (or can only be understood at that level). I think this division is not clear enough. I think everything is alive and full of different species, but I think many similar species can live in the same environment. To explain further, I would like to know how many environments exist. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
iNow Posted July 26 Share Posted July 26 It’s limited only by your imagination. How many foods exist? What happens when you combine ingredients in new ways, or prepare them differently? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GioeleAntonello Posted July 27 Author Share Posted July 27 7 minutes ago, iNow said: It’s limited only by your imagination. How many foods exist? What happens when you combine ingredients in new ways, or prepare them differently? I think the body types are the same throughout the universe. Everyone can see that galaxies, black holes and stars are the same in all places. The same for particles and atoms. So if the larger body and the smaller body are the same, how is it possible that all the other in between worlds are different. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
iNow Posted July 27 Share Posted July 27 I encourage you not to build castles in sand nor stack new hypothesis on top of unsupported guesswork Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GioeleAntonello Posted July 27 Author Share Posted July 27 10 hours ago, iNow said: I encourage you not to build castles in sand nor stack new hypothesis on top of unsupported guesswork It is better to be sure, but it is to be considered that everything physical has been fully observed. I just want to put it in order a little bit. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dimreepr Posted July 27 Share Posted July 27 3 hours ago, GioeleAntonello said: It is better to be sure, but it is to be considered that everything physical has been fully observed. Observed by what method? Did you see it, hear it or feel it in the groin? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
iNow Posted July 27 Share Posted July 27 3 hours ago, GioeleAntonello said: it is to be considered that everything physical has been fully observed I’ve considered this and concluded it’s wrong Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GioeleAntonello Posted July 27 Author Share Posted July 27 21 minutes ago, dimreepr said: Observed by what method? Did you see it, hear it or feel it in the groin? Microscope or telescope Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dimreepr Posted July 27 Share Posted July 27 12 minutes ago, GioeleAntonello said: Microscope or telescope Which is better with sound? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MigL Posted July 27 Share Posted July 27 What is the purpose, or benefit, of this classification scheme you are trying to devise ? How exactly does it enable us to better understand the world around us; or does it just add another layer of confusion/misdefinitions ?? I get the impression you are fairly young, and this might be a way for you to try to make sense of differing scale effects. I suggest, instead, studying to learn the basics of science, and the understanding will come. In the meanwhile, feel free to ask questions here, and we'll try to make sure the understanding comes to you as quickly as possible. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GioeleAntonello Posted July 27 Author Share Posted July 27 (edited) 7 hours ago, dimreepr said: Which is better with sound? this radiation this magnetic field this sound 8 hours ago, iNow said: I’ve considered this and concluded it’s wrong So you think that there something more big of galaxies or more small off particles, or you think there different places in the universe that follow a different body logic? Or you just think that there endless kind of phisic phenomena that we can't see yet? 3 hours ago, MigL said: What is the purpose, or benefit, of this classification scheme you are trying to devise ? How exactly does it enable us to better understand the world around us; or does it just add another layer of confusion/misdefinitions ?? I get the impression you are fairly young, and this might be a way for you to try to make sense of differing scale effects. I suggest, instead, studying to learn the basics of science, and the understanding will come. In the meanwhile, feel free to ask questions here, and we'll try to make sure the understanding comes to you as quickly as possible. I need to find the number of environments that exist. The idea is to find an order of all the parts of nature that have been discovered. I need it for my philosophical research, because I think everything is alive and skills are organized into species from all parts of the universe. We all are always in contact with the universe and the people within it, as humans, cells or planets. I think skills are decided all along and passed down, and I think each species has different skills, which they can use to help or teach to others. Edited July 27 by GioeleAntonello Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
studiot Posted July 27 Share Posted July 27 (edited) Firstly I agree with TheVat that world is the wrong word for your concept. From your example list I wonder if you are thinking of self contained entities rather than scale or size ? Please expand on your idea of 'environment' and 'inhabitants'. I can see most of them in your examples but how does this relationship connect globes and energy ? Finallly I agree with MigL in wondering what the purpose of all this is ? Edited July 27 by studiot Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GioeleAntonello Posted July 27 Author Share Posted July 27 (edited) 29 minutes ago, studiot said: Firstly I agree with TheVat that world is the wrong word for your concept. From your example list I wonder if you are thinking of self contained entities rather than scale or size ? Please expand on your idea of 'environment' and 'inhabitants'. I can see most of them in your examples but how does this relationship connect globes and energy ? Finallly I agree with MigL in wondering what the purpose of all this is ? Yes I mean ecosystems: environment and inhabitants. Globes as stars are full of energy, and in our planet we produce and use energy to be alive. up there you can see the answer to MigL Edited July 27 by GioeleAntonello Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
zapatos Posted July 28 Share Posted July 28 2 hours ago, GioeleAntonello said: I need to find the number of environments that exist. "Environments" are a man made concept. None exist. Millions exist. Depends on who you ask. Make it up yourself and you'll have your answer without having to search. Nature did not create "environments." "Environments" are simply categories created by man to help us better make sense of the world. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
iNow Posted July 28 Share Posted July 28 2 hours ago, GioeleAntonello said: So you think that there something more big of galaxies or more small off particles, or you think there different places in the universe that follow a different body logic? Or you just think that there endless kind of phisic phenomena that we can't see yet? Sure Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GioeleAntonello Posted July 28 Author Share Posted July 28 8 hours ago, zapatos said: "Environments" are a man made concept. None exist. Millions exist. Depends on who you ask. Make it up yourself and you'll have your answer without having to search. Nature did not create "environments." "Environments" are simply categories created by man to help us better make sense of the world. Environment are not invented. Ex. Humans can not live outside the planet Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
iNow Posted July 28 Share Posted July 28 2 hours ago, GioeleAntonello said: Environment are not invented. You either have missed the point, are intentionally misunderstanding how human labels are arbitrary, or a combination of both. Either way, this comment is remedially false. 2 hours ago, GioeleAntonello said: Humans can not live outside the planet Have you never heard of an astronaut? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GioeleAntonello Posted July 28 Author Share Posted July 28 (edited) 33 minutes ago, iNow said: You either have missed the point, are intentionally misunderstanding how human labels are arbitrary, or a combination of both. Either way, this comment is remedially false. Have you never heard of an astronaut? I understand that you think all species are placed in random places of the universe. The life of astronauts is linked to the earth (oxygen and water). Anyway I completed this order of nature worlds by my own: 1 Particles Atoms 2 Bonds Molecules 2 Chromosome Nucleus 4 Cells Organs 5 Organisms Materials 6 Energies Globes 7 Galaxy Black holes Are the first time on this forum and I had no help for this easy things for a normal scientist. I hope you are not here only to steal researches or to doubt about questions instead of give answers, maybe you only care for money. Edited July 28 by GioeleAntonello -2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
iNow Posted July 28 Share Posted July 28 14 minutes ago, GioeleAntonello said: you think all species are placed in random places of the universe. Random is not the word I would choose 15 minutes ago, GioeleAntonello said: I hope you are not here only to steal researches or to doubt about questions instead of give answers Often the best answer is to doubt or challenge the question. You would do well to take this feedback on board 15 minutes ago, GioeleAntonello said: maybe you only care for money Dufuq? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GioeleAntonello Posted July 28 Author Share Posted July 28 2 minutes ago, iNow said: Random is not the word I would choose Often the best answer is to doubt or challenge the question. You would do well to take this feedback on board Dufuq? A question correct are question easy to understand. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
iNow Posted July 28 Share Posted July 28 Righto Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dimreepr Posted July 28 Share Posted July 28 14 hours ago, GioeleAntonello said: Yes I mean ecosystems: environment and inhabitants. So, the answer to the OP is 1, wait, it could be 0, if we take the topic title literally; even if we include ghosts, it's still a 1 or a 0 naturally. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
iNow Posted July 28 Share Posted July 28 Wow. Lots of red negs. Lol Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now