Why it`s not possible to live forever

[Frank1985]

The cells in your soul, that make up your soul, deterioates over time. Stress, manual labour etc. makes them age faster, if it goes beyond normal use. And, if you change them all, it wouldn`t be you anymore ether.

You`re kinda stuck with the same cells all life. The more complex you are in intelligence and makeup, the longer you live. So, if you born with 70 IQ for example, you usually live to around 60, while 120 and above, maybe 110 years old. This is because the higher intelligence, the more cells in the soul.
So where is the soul? It`s not actually in the brain, it`s below it, in the brain-stem. It`s more like a muscle, while the brain is more like an organ of soft tissue. The brain-stem, extends all the way down the spine, so you`re able to move your body like you want to.

Some have pointed out that the brain have motor-functions, but what really happens if you operate away one of the half of the brain, is that the shock from the loss of a body-part itself, makes you go into a shock a little. Hence lose motor-controls for a while, until you recuperate. The brain, also makes hormones, and the product of these hormones, are stored in the pinael-gland. For a lack of a better term, it slowly dips into blood-stream to the brain-stem, making you feel good and nourished. Hormones does more than just nourish, it also makes you feel good.

If the soul, was in the brain, you wouldn`t be able to move around because you need muscles for it. It just sits on top, so it wouldn`t have the strength to make the body move around. The brain is more higher thinking basically, but you`re not entirely dependent on it, as the soul makes the decicions in the brain-stem.

The eyes, are connected directly to the brain-stem also, and the eyes are the window of the soul. Even without a brain, the muscles controlling the eyes, are still there, and connected to the brain-stem.

Basically, there`ll never be a way to live forever. Nature would have done it already also, if it were possible. The planet would fill up also, making no room for new life. Thanks for being here, from Norway, looking forward to post

Edited August 22 by Frank1985
Some spelling errors

[Phi for All]

!

Moderator Note

I'm moving this to Religion, unless you're ready to provide evidence that a "soul" exists in the first place. This can't stay in Biology without that level of support.

 

[CharonY]

17 minutes ago, Frank1985 said:

The cells in your soul, that make up your soul, deterioates over time.

Define the cellular complex that you call soul. Where is it located and what cell types does it consist of?

 

17 minutes ago, Frank1985 said:

You`re kinda stuck with the same cells all life.

Provide evidence for that claim, please. Cellular composition does change over time and, most evidently of course during development, but different systems have more or less plasticity. If there was no change, your immune system worthless, for example. 

 

17 minutes ago, Frank1985 said:

So, if you born with 70 IQ for example, you usually live to around 60, while 120 and above, maybe 110 years old.

Provide evidence for a correlation between IQ and life expectancy, and consider the impact of cofounding factors (e.g. socioeconomic status).

 

17 minutes ago, Frank1985 said:

So where is the soul? It`s not actually in the brain, it`s below it, in the brain-stem. It`s more like a muscle, while the brain is more like an organ of soft tissue. The brain-stem, extends all the way down the spine, so you`re able to move your body like you want to.

Why do you want to rename things randomly?

17 minutes ago, Frank1985 said:

For a lack of a better term, it slowly dips into blood-stream to the brain-stem, making you feel good and nourished. Hormones does more than just nourish, it also makes you feel good.

Please read up regarding the functions of the humoral system.

Throughout, there no evidence is provided that a soul exists in the first place beyond assertions. Mixing badly understood anatomy in does not make it better.

Also, there is zero connection between the title of the thread and its content.

[MigL]

Based on how some people think the world works, it's a wonder they made it past puberty, never mind 60, 110, or forever.

[harlock]

animals're an example about how can be different their biology..

the real fact is:

can a 'human' biology have eternal life?

 the answer is yes about christianity because the n.t. says humans'll have

a new body and a new food(1 cor 6, 13 - 'new creation'). 

obviously humans'd be christians who'll be forgiven from original sin(only jesus talks about

eternal life, the end of the seventy weeks of daniel. so no new creation for muslims).

[TheVat]

I liked Woody Allen's reply when he was asked in an interview,

How would you like people to think of you a hundred years from now?

Allen answered,

I'd like them to think:  my, but he looks good for his age!

 

[swansont]

!

Moderator Note

After further discussion, this is moved to speculations. The OP makes several claims of a factual/scientific nature, and needs to provide some sort of evidence in support of them, or a way to test their hypothesis.

 

[harlock]

5 hours ago, TheVat said:

I liked Woody Allen's reply when he was asked in an interview,

How would you like people to think of you a hundred years from now?

Allen answered,

I'd like them to think:  my, but he looks good for his age!

 

good for atheists without a doubt.