split from Parameters of Theory of everything.

[chron44]

 

2 hours ago, Mordred said:

It's an interesting and informative reading I highly recommend it.

http://arxiv.org/pdf/0904.1556.pdf

 

1 hour ago, chron44 said:

I.e. is the BB the only universal evolutionary candidate for this article?
(Is it possible to estimate?)

 

This is what I found from Chat GPT 3.5:

"Grand Unification Theories (GUTs) aim to unify the three fundamental forces of the Standard Model into a single force at high energy scales. While several GUT models have been proposed (such as SU(5) and SO(10)), experimental evidence for key predictions, like proton decay, remains elusive. GUTs are considered a stepping stone towards an even more fundamental theory that would unify all fundamental forces, including gravity, in the quest for a Theory of Everything. However, many challenges and open questions remain, keeping GUTs at the forefront of theoretical research in particle physics."

So, if I try to answer my issue myself, according to Chat GPT, GUT is in need of a rather or very hot universe (high energy scales) with a cooling down procedure. Where probably a BB or a resembling universal evolutionary frame is needed.

 

 

[chron44]

58 minutes ago, chron44 said:

Grand Unification Theories (GUTs) aim to unify the three fundamental forces of the Standard Model into a single force at high energy scales. While several GUT models have been proposed (such as SU(5) and SO(10)), experimental evidence for key predictions, like proton decay, remains elusive.

If a GUT is to be considered for ToE. One crucial issue becomes. How long can physics "wait" till a proton decay is noticed? -And therefore reasonably prove a GUT being the manner in which universe works?

Have there been physicists who claim this period being fulfilled?

???

 

[Mordred]

The decay rate far exceeds the age of the Universe. How would one fulfill that ?

The evidence supports the decay rate but there has never been an observed decay afiak 

[chron44]

 

This is also fetched from Chat GPT:

"When, GUTs are deeply connected to the Standard Model: -The cosmological constant problem and the non-observation of proton decay, looks like central challenges that have not outright disproven GUTs or the Standard Model but, have highlighted significant gaps in these theories."

Can anyone comment these central discrepancies?

 

[Mordred]

Sure if I wanted to argue with ChatGpt. A textbook itself would be a better resource to learn from.

There isn't much more to say, we haven't confirmed 100 percent on either issue. When you get right down to it no theory is ever 100 percent.

Our best evidence is our best evidence. Till something better comes along that's what we have to work with

[swansont]

!

Moderator Note

Per policy, ChatGPT can’t be used as a source.