Michael McMahon Posted August 31 Posted August 31 (edited) Are space dimensions objective like metres or relativistic like personal feet units? One way to find out might be if you changed the depth on the final screen of the double slit experiment. So when a multiprong interference pattern occurs for unobserved electrons then you could move that screen much closer to the double slit. This would help rule out the electrons moving diagonally to the interference prongs on the far edges as if the electrons were moving straight from the edge of double slit card to the interference pattern like a probabilistic wave. After all an electron is so small that even having the interference screen one centimetre from the double slit could be sufficient as millions of electron lengths. Or if you moved the interference screen further away from the double slit then would the prongs on the interference pattern form further apart to avoid visual perspective or closer together to abide by visual perspective? What other variables could be ruled out? A double slit experiment performed in a vacuum to avoid air molecule collisions! A relativistic version of quantum mechanics might mean that you could have any particle like a neutron or a photon chosen as your favourite length where every other particle would be measured in terms of your favourite particle. Anyway for every thread blocked is a potential way for me to form a new thread lest I be banned altogether! “One way to interpret the quantum double slit experiment through the lens of classical mechanics might be if a torch was shone through a double slit rather than a laser beam! Moderator Note And, on a related note, your thread on this was closed for lack of rigor.” 3:48 mirror perspective discussion: The Matrix Resurrections 2021 Clips: The Tokyo Train Fighting Scene Could the multi-prong interference pattern during the double slit experiment function like illusory glare on your glasses?! Edited August 31 by Michael McMahon
swansont Posted August 31 Posted August 31 52 minutes ago, Michael McMahon said: Moderator Note And, on a related note, your thread on this was closed for lack of rigor.” ! Moderator Note I hope you understand that movie clips do not tally anything in the “rigor” column.
Recommended Posts