Jump to content

Is there any truth to the monkey theory that writes forever?


Recommended Posts

Hello everyone, I saw a very interesting video and I am confused. Can a monkey really write so accurately if given infinite time? Doesn't this prove the superiority of randomness over creativity?
 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, cokebarc said:

Hello everyone, I saw a very interesting video and I am confused. Can a monkey really write so accurately if given infinite time? Doesn't this prove the superiority of randomness over creativity?
 

 

What a silly question. Do you have infinite time at your disposal? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, cokebarc said:

I can prove that the sky is not made of concrete. Can you prove we won't be able to control time in 500 years?

😴ZZzzzzz...........

 

This is too silly for me. I'm out. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, cokebarc said:

Hello everyone, I saw a very interesting video and I am confused. Can a monkey really write so accurately if given infinite time? Doesn't this prove the superiority of randomness over creativity?

If you shoot a million shots and get one bullseye, that’s not “accurate”

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The monkey/typewriter thing (have usually heard it as a roomful of monkeys, with them eventually typing Hamlet) is just a way to grasp some concepts about infinity and probability.  I remember a prof invoking it in Evo biology, in re random molecular interactions leading to a proto-cell.  Very low probability events become common, given sufficient time.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just random.

Given infinite time a program that randomly prints out one letter at a time will do the same.

Note that it'll be a Library of Babel situation. There's likely, though not guaranteed, to be lot of nonsense and partial texts produced as well.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think one of the trickier examples of statistics given enough time is the Boltzmann Brain conjecture where given enough time the Universe itself could develop a brain.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Boltzmann_brain

It's not a conjecture I particularly follow but it's one example of how statistical systems given enough time can be applied to some highly speculative outcomes.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

34 minutes ago, Mordred said:

I think one of the trickier examples of statistics given enough time is the Boltzmann Brain conjecture where given enough time the Universe itself could develop a brain.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Boltzmann_brain

It's not a conjecture I particularly follow but it's one example of how statistical systems given enough time can be applied to some highly speculative outcomes.

Has it not already produced brains from stochastic and deterministic processes without external agency? 

Edited by StringJunky
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, StringJunky said:

Has it not already produced brains from stochastic and deterministic processes without external agency? 

Well as stated it's not a conjecture I've chosen to follow closely so wouldn't really know if Boltzmann brains exist or not. Given the probability errors on that link. I hadn't read anything stating such conclusively.

 Truth be told I never found any practicality behind studying the conjecture. So never wasted much time on it. Usually when I do it's to assist some poster understand the physics involved as numerous papers have the FLRW metric as well as SM processes such as EW symmetry breaking and inflation.

Edited by Mordred
Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 hours ago, Endy0816 said:

Note that it'll be a Library of Babel situation. There's likely, though not guaranteed, to be lot of nonsense and partial texts produced as well.

Great story by Borges.  I liked the religious cult that emerges in the Library which believes that somewhere must be a book which perfectly indexes all the other books.  

Edited by TheVat
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...
On 9/9/2024 at 11:33 AM, cokebarc said:

Can a monkey really write so accurately if given infinite time? Doesn't this prove the superiority of randomness over creativity?

No, because monkeys aren't random.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.