Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

What are your thoughts on it? I believe that, theoretically, veganism is more ethical than eating meat, but realistically, I don't expect everyone to become a vegan, given that farming and hunting animals for meat has been a practice in all cultures that I'm aware of, even ones which lived closer to nature.

While the book of Genesis in the Bible says that Adam and Eve were vegans prior to the Fall of Man, I'm not sure where this actually fits into cultural history.

Posted

Why is the Bible relevant in General Philosophy? I'm sure the Bhagavad Gita has a different take on it.

Philosophy is supposed to be objective.

Posted
2 hours ago, Night FM said:

While the book of Genesis in the Bible says that Adam and Eve were vegans prior to the Fall of Man

Does it say this?Or is it just an inference that requires you to believe also that carnivores were vegans, too?

2 hours ago, joigus said:

Why is the Bible relevant in General Philosophy? I'm sure the Bhagavad Gita has a different take on it.

Philosophy is supposed to be objective.

Moved to ethics, because of the title.

Posted
2 hours ago, Night FM said:

While the book of Genesis in the Bible says that Adam and Eve were vegans prior to the Fall of Man, I'm not sure where this actually fits into cultural history.

This always seemed like an extremist stance. The quotes from the Bible say that green plants are given for food, but it never says "Don't eat the animals!" the way it says "Don't eat apples from that tree over there!" Just like abortion and divorce, isn't it possible their god disapproves of something but allows it in some circumstances?

And the idea that all those obligate carnivores were munching nuts and dandelions is just crazy, as is the idea that their god changed up the physiology of everything after A&E got too curious. 

I don't think there's anything unethical about eating meat, not back then, not today. Animal husbandry and agriculture upgraded us from hunters and gatherers. What we should focus on is being able to raise our food animals without destroying the habitats of all the non-food animals we live alongside of. Diversity in all things. No more monocropping, no more factory farming. There are better ways.

Posted

There are multiple ethical issues that swirl around veganism v carnivory.

The ethics of how we treat animals - which gets into how animals suffer, factory farming conditions, and whether animals are lesser beings which we may legitimately use for our sustenance.

The ethics of the resource-intensive high carbon footprint production of meat.  An issue of eco stewardship and sustainability for eight billion plus people.

The ethics of public health policies and recommendations against meat consumption - i.e. impact on human health and any obligation to make the costs of meat consumption known to the general public.

For me, there are some things that change when you go from a hunter gatherer population of 10-200 million people to modern societies supporting eight billion.  I am vegan, five days per week, with sustainable catch fish and free-range eggs two days per week.  Pure veganism results in fatigue and minor health issues for me, an experience that seems to be pretty common.  Generally, I am happy to (as GB Shaw put it) mostly leave the animals alone.  Factory farming (which I've experienced up close) is a nightmare.

Posted

I think it's unethical to use legislation to ban lab grown meat because rich people in the cattle and ag-community pay off and heavily pressure their congress people to do so (not due to any genuine health risks). Same for the treatment of nut milks bc the dairy industry doesn't like it. 

  • 1 month later...
Posted

In my experience most thoughtful individuals find factory farming unethical, though it obviously passes the ethical standard for society at large. But there are small ranching operations that don't use agribusiness techniques such that the only alternative to factory farming is vegetarianism.

Posted
7 hours ago, LuckyR said:

In my experience most thoughtful individuals find factory farming unethical, though it obviously passes the ethical standard for society at large. But there are small ranching operations that don't use agribusiness techniques such that the only alternative to factory farming is vegetarianism.

I think the ethics only enter into it if you’re wealthy enough to have options, and having a significant fraction of people above the threshold is a relatively recent occurrence. 

Posted
15 hours ago, swansont said:

I think the ethics only enter into it if you’re wealthy enough to have options, and having a significant fraction of people above the threshold is a relatively recent occurrence. 

Well, by that measure factory farming itself is also of "relatively recent occurence".

  • 2 months later...
Posted

So genesis does indeed reach that humans were vegans prior the events of the flood. It’s only after the flood that it’s mentioned that it’s ok to now eat meat.  But you have to understand that Genesis is not a singular story. It’s 2-3 different traditions of Judaism that developed overtime stitched together creating a biblical seam. So genesis 1 for example is believed to have been written after Genesis 2 but that they both are also from different sects of Judaism. We see this by the fact that Abel gave an animal sacrifice. This was most likely a redaction created at a later point than Genesis 6 and all of it seems to either be a reimagining of The Epic of Gilgamesh or either both are based on an older now lost text. So you can’t really argue either or. You can argue for both. 
 

But besides that, is veganism more ethical than enslaving and killing and eating an animal? I would say it’s objectively more ethical, depending on how you define ethics. I’ve been a vegan for close to 18 years now. I went vegan first for farm animals. They are obviously sentient beings that feel fear and pain as they suffer leading up to their death.  As time went on and I learned more about it and how it affects the environment I added to reasons for being one.  80%+ of pastures and crops are for livestock. The bulk of the rainforest being cut down in South America is for livestock including livestock feed. More land is being deforested and more rivers being dammed ( and damned ) to help add power to these corpse manufactures. 
 

however, loss of life is part of this planet in the way we are set up. I have cats. Three of them. While my cats don’t need to be vegan or forced into it by me, I benefit from the byproducts of slaughtered animals since it’s used to help make food. While my contribution is far smaller than someone who consistently eat meat, I still have some blood on my hand.  So I don’t think I’m better than someone else, but I do believe I’m making less of a carbon footprint with my diet than them and my own meals are more ethical. 

Posted
15 minutes ago, Skovand said:

So genesis does indeed reach that humans were vegans prior the events of the flood. It’s only after the flood that it’s mentioned that it’s ok to now eat meat.

Can you please be specific about chapter and verse?

Posted
2 hours ago, Skovand said:

 I would say it’s objectively more ethical, depending on how you define ethics.

If an ethical choice can be objectively so, that would imply an agreed upon definition of ethics, would it not?  And one presumes a definition grounded in objective facts about the welfare of animals.

For example, it's pretty clear that animal confinement involves some suffering, so a choice to eat only wild-caught fish would reduce some suffering.  And that choice would also reduce carbon footprint, given that wild caught fish "raise themselves" and, thanks to modern canning methods, can be transported far inland efficiently and without refrigerator trucks.   That's just one example, but it shows there are objective facts about benefits to the environment and reduced animal suffering that can be factored in to one's menu choices.   

Ethics seems to me an endeavor where we try to become aware of causes and effects of our actions, rather than seeking to "be better" than someone else.  (which usually engenders attitudes that are counterproductive to fostering awareness)  

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.