1. Sub Quantum Echo Particles...(SQEP's) & Sub Quantum Echo Particle Kinetic Resonance Flux

[Imagine Everything]

On 1/26/2025 at 7:38 PM, studiot said:

 

On 1/26/2025 at 7:38 PM, studiot said:

There lots of useful graphics, but can you spot the difficulty (clumsiness really) they get into using XYZ ?

Should   A_x      be where      A_y       is and vice versa?

Is this wrong because it's positioning seems to be indicating the vector A and the sub vector _x

hmm

My other thought is perhaps the A_y vector/sub vector should be above the x axis label. I wonder this because the _y sub vector appears to represent the left of the right angle. adjacent is that right? I'm not up to speed on sohcahtoa yet.

Bit tired now, maths is draining lol,  I'm erring more toward the second answer.

[Imagine Everything]

Hello world,

Hope you're all well.

So for the last week or so I have had a possible candidate for my NNP.

It fits well within the boundaries of my idea.

I suppose I should say that it is probably just one of perhaps (without knowing more) many candidates. Time always tells I suppose.

I won't mention it in this post but I am rewriting chapter 1 again and will post in more detail, hopefully with a tiny bit of backing from Heisenberg's uncertainty principle, the Pauli exclusion and at least one other if I understand them correctly or as far I can anyway. Might be more, I don't know.

I also have a more fitting name for it too now, though I won't divulge it yet.

I also don't know how long it will take to write.

I will though and if anyone is still interested then it might at the very least, be an interesting story to help bore you to sleep one night in the future  😴😴😴

 

And @studiot I think I might actually be able to draw it and possibly able to describe it in a n^th vector. I think I have learnt enough to give you at least a very basic vector anyway.

 

 

It needs a lot of work though so I'm off to do precisely that.

Stay safe

[studiot]

On 2/25/2025 at 6:26 PM, Imagine Everything said:

And @studiot I think I might actually be able to draw it and possibly able to describe it in a n^th vector. I think I have learnt enough to give you at least a very basic vector anyway.

OK let's try vectors

Vectors are little arrows.

 

Before I add the little arrows please confirm that you understand the digrams of a bow and arrow, firstly with the arrow notched but the string slack ie not drawn back.

Then secondly with the bow bent and the string pulled back.

 

This is an ideal introduction to the sort of vectors we will be interested in. There are other sorts but don't worry about them.

 

[Imagine Everything]

On 3/7/2025 at 7:56 PM, studiot said:

OK let's try vectors

Vectors are little arrows.

 

Before I add the little arrows please confirm that you understand the digrams of a bow and arrow, firstly with the arrow notched but the string slack ie not drawn back.

Then secondly with the bow bent and the string pulled back.

 

This is an ideal introduction to the sort of vectors we will be interested in. There are other sorts but don't worry about them.

 

If it is just the images as you say at the moment then yes.

The arrows both have a direction.

The second arrow has a (possible) velocity? (at some point it will be moving if let go)