Jump to content

One of the most pointless phrases to learn in another language


Janus

Recommended Posts

12 hours ago, Janus said:

It would be hard to pull off "talking like native" as a tourist in Finland, largely because the common spoken language differs somewhat from the written/formal that you'd be taught in a language course.

Finnish is on my personal list of languages I’d like to learn (to some degree) before this old brain begins to fail me :)

I’m fairly fluent in Norwegian, and can at least understand and read most Swedish too, plus some Danish. Problem here is the large number of local dialects, some of which are very different from the standard form of these languages, particularly in Norway. Is it the same in Finland?

Just out of interest.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, Markus Hanke said:

Finnish is on my personal list of languages I’d like to learn (to some degree) before this old brain begins to fail me :)

I’m fairly fluent in Norwegian, and can at least understand and read most Swedish too, plus some Danish.

Are the last three languages North Germanic while Finnish is not?

Edited by Genady
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Genady said:

Are the last three languages North Germanic while Finnish is not?

Yes, In addition, Finnish isn't even an Indo-European language, but is Uralic instead.

 

9 hours ago, Markus Hanke said:

Finnish is on my personal list of languages I’d like to learn (to some degree) before this old brain begins to fail me :)

I’m fairly fluent in Norwegian, and can at least understand and read most Swedish too, plus some Danish. Problem here is the large number of local dialects, some of which are very different from the standard form of these languages, particularly in Norway. Is it the same in Finland?

Just out of interest.

  Here is a map for the spoken "I" in different regions of Finland. https://forum.unilang.org/viewtopic.php?t=60834

In the birthplaces of my grandparents, they are Mää/Minä (right on the border between the two), mä, and miä.  Now that's today, and I don't know how this differs from when they were born.( though since they didn't seem to have any trouble communicating with each other, it must not have been an issue.)  'Minä' is the formal/written form.

However, they aren't used all that often.  Verbs are conjugated according to the pronoun they are used with, so for example " I am going" = minä menen, while you are going is sinä menet. Because of this, the pronoun is often left out, and just menen or menet alone are used.

A couple of peculiar things about Finnish are:

No articles(the/a/an)  

Limited use of prepositions, but uses "cases" instead. (metsä= forest, metsässä = in the forest)

Cases are applied to more than just the noun. ( for example;  old forest = vanha metsä, while in the old forest = vanhassa metsässä

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 10/25/2024 at 2:08 AM, Janus said:

For while now, I've been slowly trying to learn Finnish, since it was the natural tongue of all my grandparents.  However this isn't going to be strictly about that but abut learning languages in general.

They often start by teaching you a few simple phrases, that may come in useful, (hello, my name is... etc.)

One of those phrases is often along the lines of "Do you speak English(or whatever language you normally speak)?

For example, in Finnish, this would be "Puhetko* englanitia?"

After some thought, I realized that there is no real reason you need to know how to say this.

If you were in Finland and wanted to ask someone if they spoke English, you could just ask in English. If they do, they will understand you, and answer in English, and if they don't, they'll say something like "Ei"( no), or "en ymmärrä"( I don't understand), or give you some other indication that they don't.  Either way, you've got your answer.

Now, I can see where it would appear more polite to ask in Finnish( or in whatever the language is where you are), but in a purely logical sense. it is not strictly necessary.

And of course, the one thing you definitely shouldn't do if you get the second response is to ask the question again, but LOUDER.... AND....SLOWER.

  *or "puhutteko" if you being formal or addressing more than one person.

I think the forum should have an option that counts down before a message is posted for eternity on the forum, so the user will rethink what they just said. Your post makes no sense to me. In the post you showed that you learned quite a lot from the lesson: “how to ask if someone speaks a language”, ‘how to pronounce English in a foreign language’, etc. ..

It is not about what you learn, but that you learn. Some learn "shit" and the other vulgar English words before they learned that England and U.S. even exist..

ps. This thread would make more sense to me if it were written by a non-English speaker who said that the first English words he/she learned, without even knowing they were English, were rude.. Imagine which ones, I will give myself to quote them here.. This is the reality of 7.5 billion people.

 

.... (unless you think rude words are not pointless phrases ;) while learning foreign language.. ) ....

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Janus said:

A couple of peculiar things about Finnish are:

No articles(the/a/an)  

Limited use of prepositions, but uses "cases" instead. (metsä= forest, metsässä = in the forest)

Cases are applied to more than just the noun. ( for example;  old forest = vanha metsä, while in the old forest = vanhassa metsässä

Just like Russian! (I know it's OT.)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

37 minutes ago, Genady said:

Just like Russian! (I know it's OT.)

..Ugrofinlanders were displaced by the Slavic.. Finland, Hungary are remnants of...

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Finno-Ugric_languages

800px-Finno-Ugric_Languages.png.c546aba32401fc5a01b3b0c8518968dd.png

...adaptation/integration is inevitable, such as a mix of men and women from two other parties, thus creating yet another language..

(I can understand some Americans, and some Americans even other Americans can't understand! ;) )

 

(and the closer we get to the selection the less ;) )

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, Janus said:

Limited use of prepositions, but uses "cases" instead. (metsä= forest, metsässä = in the forest)

Cases are applied to more than just the noun. ( for example;  old forest = vanha metsä, while in the old forest = vanhassa metsässä

Same in German, so this is a familiar concept.

10 hours ago, Janus said:

No articles(the/a/an)

In Norwegian, there’s no definite articles either; instead, definiteness and number are marked via noun declination:

pike - young girl

piken - the girl

piker - girls

pikene - the girls

Sometimes these can be irregular also. It does have indefinite articles, though.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, Markus Hanke said:

Same in German, so this is a familiar concept.

In Norwegian, there’s no definite articles either; instead, definiteness and number are marked via noun declination:

pike - young girl

piken - the girl

piker - girls

pikene - the girls

Sometimes these can be irregular also. It does have indefinite articles, though.

Finnish:

tyttö - girl ( base/subject)

tyttöä/tyttön - girl(object)*

tyttöt girls(subject)

tyttöjä/tyttöt girls(object)*

 

 

* I am looking at the girl - katson tyttöä    I see the girl - Näen tyttön  (Tyttön is also the possessive for girl,  tyttön makki -A girl's dress)  In the same way. I am looking at the girls- katson tyttöjä and  I see the girls - Näen tyttöt 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.