Genady Posted Sunday at 12:11 PM Share Posted Sunday at 12:11 PM It is not a difficult equation. I wonder, how people approach it. Here it is: \[x+\frac{1}{x}=4\frac{1}{4}\] (Please, use spoiler in your response.) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
joigus Posted Sunday at 02:53 PM Share Posted Sunday at 02:53 PM Spoiler Method 1: 4 and 1/4 can be spotted directly, as 4+1/4 = 1/4+1/(1/4), and it's clearly equivalent to a quadratic equation (once zero is ruled out as a solution), so those are the only roots. Method 2: I rule out x=0, as it is not a solution. Then I mulltiply by x to obtain the quadratic eq. 4x2-17x+4=0, which gives x=4 and x=1/4 via the algorithm for solving quadratic equations. Spotting obvious solutions first can sometimes be very helpful to obtain the non-obvious ones when the equation is polynomial and has degree > 4. Example: x5=x What would you do? 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Genady Posted Sunday at 03:35 PM Author Share Posted Sunday at 03:35 PM (edited) Spoiler First, x=0. Then, divide by x to get x4=1 and thus x=1, -1, i, -i. Edited Sunday at 03:36 PM by Genady 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sethoflagos Posted Sunday at 03:44 PM Share Posted Sunday at 03:44 PM Spoiler x=4 is one obvious root just on inspection, but if we ignore that: Multiply both sides by 4x to give 4x2 + 4 = 17x or 4x2 - 17x+ 4 = 0 By formula x =(17 +/- (172 - 43)1/2)/8 Ans x = 4 or 1/4 Ooh! That's neat! ... what else could you be looking for? 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Genady Posted Sunday at 03:55 PM Author Share Posted Sunday at 03:55 PM (edited) 11 minutes ago, sethoflagos said: Reveal hidden contents x=4 is one obvious root just on inspection, but if we ignore that: Multiply both sides by 4x to give 4x2 + 4 = 17x or 4x2 - 17x+ 4 = 0 By formula x =(17 +/- (172 - 43)1/2)/8 Ans x = 4 or 1/4 Ooh! That's neat! ... what else could you be looking for? Spoiler Many go straight to 17/4 and miss the first approach. OTOH, some see both answers by the first approach. Edited Sunday at 03:56 PM by Genady Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheVat Posted Sunday at 04:14 PM Share Posted Sunday at 04:14 PM Spoiler For me, one solution popped out by seeing that 4 1/4 can be said as "4 and one fourth." So then x + 1/x is obviously 4. Then say the right hand part backwards, "one fourth and four" and you get the other solution, 1/4. It's really just noticing the RH part is just a number and its reciprocal. 31 minutes ago, sethoflagos said: what else could you be looking for? You did it the hard way. 🙂 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sethoflagos Posted Sunday at 04:22 PM Share Posted Sunday at 04:22 PM 4 minutes ago, TheVat said: Hide contents You did it the hard way. 🙂 Force of habit. I ALWAYS do the check longhand just to be sure. (Chem Eng thing) 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Genady Posted Sunday at 09:29 PM Author Share Posted Sunday at 09:29 PM 5 hours ago, sethoflagos said: Reveal hidden contents x=4 is one obvious root just on inspection, but if we ignore that: Multiply both sides by 4x to give 4x2 + 4 = 17x or 4x2 - 17x+ 4 = 0 By formula x =(17 +/- (172 - 43)1/2)/8 Ans x = 4 or 1/4 Ooh! That's neat! ... what else could you be looking for? I just thought of something else, for a case when one sees one solution but not the other: Spoiler Instead of solving the quadratic equation, one can notice that after multiplying by x the quadratic equation will have a constant term 1, which means that the product of the roots is 1, which gives the second root, 1/4. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sethoflagos Posted yesterday at 12:31 AM Share Posted yesterday at 12:31 AM 2 hours ago, Genady said: I just thought of something else, for a case when one sees one solution but not the other: Reveal hidden contents Instead of solving the quadratic equation, one can notice that after multiplying by x the quadratic equation will have a constant term 1, which means that the product of the roots is 1, which gives the second root, 1/4. My impression of equations of that type are dominated by: x - 1/x = 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Genady Posted yesterday at 12:44 AM Author Share Posted yesterday at 12:44 AM 12 minutes ago, sethoflagos said: My impression of equations of that type are dominated by: x - 1/x = 1 Could you elabotate? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sethoflagos Posted yesterday at 10:15 AM Share Posted yesterday at 10:15 AM (edited) 9 hours ago, Genady said: Could you elabotate? Spoiler Your OP equation is one of a family whose roots are the positive inverse of each other. Conversely mine is one of a family whose roots have a negative inverse relationship. eg. x - 1/x = 3 3/4 solves to x = 4, -1/4 x - 1/x = 1 solves to the golden ratio (as I'm sure you know) and its negative inverse. A deep, deep rabbit hole I've ventured into on occasion. Compare and contrast: x + 1/x = 51/2 Edited yesterday at 10:42 AM by sethoflagos 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Genady Posted yesterday at 11:28 AM Author Share Posted yesterday at 11:28 AM (edited) 1 hour ago, sethoflagos said: Reveal hidden contents Your OP equation is one of a family whose roots are the positive inverse of each other. Conversely mine is one of a family whose roots have a negative inverse relationship. eg. x - 1/x = 3 3/4 solves to x = 4, -1/4 x - 1/x = 1 solves to the golden ratio (as I'm sure you know) and its negative inverse. A deep, deep rabbit hole I've ventured into on occasion. Compare and contrast: x + 1/x = 51/2 I see. A general form Spoiler \[x+\frac{a}{x}=b\] has roots with the product \(a\) and the sum \(b\). (However, the OP was about how people approach that equation rather than a mathematics behind it.) (I see how YOU approach it 🙂 ) Edited yesterday at 11:29 AM by Genady Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Genady Posted yesterday at 12:38 PM Author Share Posted yesterday at 12:38 PM I'll post my approach, for the record. Spoiler I wrote the RHS as \[x+\frac{1}{x}=4+\frac{1}{4}\] This immediately gave me one answer. The second answer took a bit more effort, but I don't recall the exact thinking there. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now