raphaelh42 Posted November 6 Posted November 6 Hello, i'm regularly disgusted and angry when seeing some religious people, so i decided to create my own, so i act instead of just suffering Yesterday i was against religions, i don't know all of them tho Today I created the rhism, RH being my initials So i'm now religious, i'm rhist What do you think about this act ? the book of the religion is hosted on a simple webpage, at url deleted, if you are interested about reading the content I feel so much better now, having concentrated what is most important for me, and i feel that if some people would practice it, that would make the world better Tomorrow if i see some people talk to me about their religion, try to convince me etc, i could just say i don't like their religion, i have my own, it's also like a slap to their (imo) cowardness
TheVat Posted November 6 Posted November 6 I started one, too, using my last initial, J. You can find it at jism.org! As for Rhism....die, heretic! Burn in Hell for 12 aeons! NON SATIRICAL PORTION OF POST You need to post your theological material, doctrines, core beliefs, metaphysical postulates, whatever, in the OP. See the rule about not requiring members to click on your external webpage, ok? 1
swansont Posted November 6 Posted November 6 1 hour ago, raphaelh42 said: What do you think about this act ? ! Moderator Note I think posting to advertise your site is against the rules, so I think I will delete the link. Content for discussion is to be posted here.
raphaelh42 Posted November 6 Author Posted November 6 (edited) i posted the non clickable url so people could see the content of the religion i created, if they wanted to i posted this thread not to advertise my religion, but hoping to read some feelings / opinions about what i did and why i did it because sometimes i like to see what people think about what i do, to debate and learn about myself, i think it's positive i don't think the content of the religion is the most important here Edited November 6 by raphaelh42
zapatos Posted November 6 Posted November 6 47 minutes ago, raphaelh42 said: i don't think the content of the religion is the most important here In that case I think it is self-loathing to create your own religion when you are disgusted and angry with religious people. 1
raphaelh42 Posted November 6 Author Posted November 6 7 hours ago, zapatos said: In that case I think it is self-loathing to create your own religion when you are disgusted and angry with religious people. Thank you for sharing your thoughts I think religions can provide some rigor and pride, some healthy lifestyle, but those i use to see really disgust me, i wanted to offer to people one that i think is better it's just few foundations, not a big book of fairy tails unfortunately the url to the book (html) got deleted foundation n°3 is Quote Le bien et le mal sont subjectif. I do no translate my religion, but people can use google translator if they don't understand its language and would like to I would like to develop n°3 Let's take something that i think is bad, horrible, and everyone think it's bad too it's never 100% everyone tho, someone did the thing, he said in your opinion it's good, he even feels pleasure doing it i'm not aware of some physical law, to prove i'm/we are right that it's bad, of he/they are wrong
raphaelh42 Posted 9 hours ago Author Posted 9 hours ago i would have preferred to be able to edit first post instead of bumping thread ftr i deleted the religion i created because i don't like the practice of needing to have foundations written down it makes things kinda static and prevents evolution in my opinion was an interesting experience tho
npts2020 Posted 5 hours ago Posted 5 hours ago 3 hours ago, raphaelh42 said: i would have preferred to be able to edit first post instead of bumping thread ftr i deleted the religion i created because i don't like the practice of needing to have foundations written down it makes things kinda static and prevents evolution in my opinion was an interesting experience tho Depends on how you write and approach things. Look at science, for example, there is more written than any current human could ever hope to absorb but I don't see by what criteria you could ever call science "static" or unable to "evolve".
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now