I created a religion today

[raphaelh42]

Hello, i'm regularly disgusted and angry when seeing some religious people, so i decided to create my own, so i act instead of just suffering

Yesterday i was against religions, i don't know all of them tho

Today I created the rhism, RH being my initials

So i'm now religious, i'm rhist

What do you think about this act ?

the book of the religion is hosted on a simple webpage, at url deleted, if you are interested about reading the content

I feel so much better now, having concentrated what is most important for me, and i feel that if some people would practice it, that would make the world better

Tomorrow if i see some people talk to me about their religion, try to convince me etc, i could just say i don't like their religion, i have my own, it's also like a slap to their (imo) cowardness

[TheVat]

I started one, too, using my last initial, J.  You  can find it at jism.org!

As for Rhism....die, heretic!  Burn in Hell for 12 aeons!

NON SATIRICAL PORTION OF POST

You need to post your theological material, doctrines, core beliefs, metaphysical postulates, whatever, in the OP.  See the rule about not requiring members to click on your external webpage, ok?

 

[swansont]

1 hour ago, raphaelh42 said:

What do you think about this act ?

!

Moderator Note

I think posting to advertise your site is against the rules, so I think I will delete the link.

Content for discussion is to be posted here.

 

[raphaelh42]

i posted the non clickable url so people could see the content of the religion i created, if they wanted to

i posted this thread not to advertise my religion, but hoping to read some feelings / opinions about what i did and why i did it

because sometimes i like to see what people think about what i do, to debate and learn about myself, i think it's positive

i don't think the content of the religion is the most important here

Edited November 6 by raphaelh42

[zapatos]

47 minutes ago, raphaelh42 said:

i don't think the content of the religion is the most important here

In that case I think it is self-loathing to create your own religion when you are disgusted and angry with religious people.

[raphaelh42]

7 hours ago, zapatos said:

In that case I think it is self-loathing to create your own religion when you are disgusted and angry with religious people.

Thank you for sharing your thoughts

I think religions can provide some rigor and pride, some healthy lifestyle, but those i use to see really disgust me, i wanted to offer to people one that i think is better

it's just few foundations, not a big book of fairy tails

unfortunately the url to the book (html) got deleted

foundation n°3 is

Quote

Le bien et le mal sont subjectif.

I do no translate my religion, but people can use google translator if they don't understand its language and would like to

I would like to develop n°3

Let's take something that i think is bad, horrible, and everyone think it's bad too

it's never 100% everyone tho, someone did the thing, he said in your opinion it's good, he even feels pleasure doing it

i'm not aware of some physical law, to prove i'm/we are right that it's bad, of he/they are wrong

 

[raphaelh42]

he said in your his opinion

[raphaelh42]

i would have preferred to be able to edit first post instead of bumping thread

ftr

i deleted the religion i created because i don't like the practice of needing to have foundations written down

it makes things kinda static and prevents evolution in my opinion

was an interesting experience tho

[npts2020]

3 hours ago, raphaelh42 said:

i would have preferred to be able to edit first post instead of bumping thread

ftr

i deleted the religion i created because i don't like the practice of needing to have foundations written down

it makes things kinda static and prevents evolution in my opinion

was an interesting experience tho

Depends on how you write and approach things. Look at science, for example, there is more written than any current human could ever hope to absorb but I don't see by what criteria you could ever call science "static" or unable to "evolve".