The Higgs Bridge Theory: A Hypothesis on Gravity, Mass, and Parallel Dimensions

[TheBridge]

Hi everyone,

 

I’m an amateur with no formal background in physics, but I’ve been thinking about some ideas and wanted to share them. I’ve used ChatGPT to help clarify and refine my thoughts, as English isn’t my first language. That said, I’ve come up with a hypothesis I’m calling the Higgs Bridge Theory—and I’d love to hear your thoughts on it.

 

The Idea

 

My theory proposes that gravity and mass could arise from interactions between particles in our dimension and their counterparts in parallel dimensions. The Higgs field (or Higgs boson) could act as a bridge between these dimensions, with particles “tethered” to their counterparts across dimensions. The mass of a particle would depend on the strength and frequency of this interdimensional tethering.

 

How It Works

 

• Particles in our universe have counterparts in parallel dimensions, connected by the Higgs field.

• The frequency of interaction between a particle and its counterpart determines the particle’s mass: the closer the counterparts are in the parallel dimension, the stronger and more frequent the interaction, giving the particle more mass.

• Gravity is a result of these interactions: the stronger the connection between dimensions (more mass), the stronger the gravitational pull. The more massive an object, the more particles it has, leading to a greater gravitational influence.

 

Existing Evidence and Concepts

 

While this theory is speculative, it aligns with some existing concepts in physics:

• String theory and other quantum gravity models already suggest the existence of higher dimensions.

• The Higgs field is a key part of the Standard Model of particle physics, and the discovery of the Higgs boson in 2012 provided evidence that the Higgs field is real and interacts with particles to give them mass.

• The hierarchy problem—why gravity is so much weaker than the other fundamental forces—could be explained by these interdimensional connections. The force of gravity might be diluted across different dimensions, making it appear weaker in our universe.

 

Predictions

 

If this theory holds any weight, we might predict:

1. Gravitational anomalies related to mass, especially for extremely dense objects. For example, black holes might show unique gravitational properties due to their interdimensional interactions.

2. Mass variations between particles depending on the frequency and strength of their interdimensional connections. More massive objects may exhibit greater gravitational effects because of stronger connections with counterparts in parallel dimensions.

3. Hawking radiation and black hole information paradox could be explained through the interactions between dimensions, where information isn’t lost but transferred across dimensions instead.

 

Some Basic Math (A Speculative Start)

 

Let’s consider the interaction between a particle and its counterpart across dimensions. If the strength of the interaction is proportional to the distance between the two particles in parallel dimensions, we might express mass m as a function of the frequency of this interaction:

 

 

m = \frac{c}{d} \cdot f

 

 

Where:

• c is a constant (could be related to the strength of the Higgs field),

• d is the distance between particles in parallel dimensions,

• f is the frequency of the interaction (which could vary depending on the particle’s proximity to its counterpart).

 

Conclusion

 

This theory is just a speculative starting point, but I think it might offer a fresh perspective on gravity, mass, and how the universe works at a fundamental level. It doesn’t reject current models outright but suggests a deeper, interdimensional interaction that could explain gravity in a new way.

 

Again, I’m not a physicist—just an amateur with some curiosity. I’d love to hear your thoughts and feedback!

Edit: Expanded Explanation of the Bridge Theory

 

To expand on the core concepts of the Bridge Theory in more detail:

 

The Higgs Field as a Bridge Between Dimensions:

 

In standard particle physics, the Higgs field is often viewed as a field that exists throughout the universe, giving mass to elementary particles when they interact with it. However, in this theory, I propose that the Higgs field acts as a bridge between our universe and a parallel one, rather than simply being a local field.

• Imagine that particles in our dimension are connected to counterparts in a parallel dimension through this Higgs field. These counterparts exist in a different dimensional space, and their interaction with the particle in our universe defines the mass of that particle.

• The Higgs field, therefore, is not just a passive field giving mass to particles, but a dynamic bridge that links particles to their counterparts across dimensions. The strength of the tether (or the link) between a particle and its counterpart determines the particle’s mass. This connection is a cross-dimensional interaction, where energy and mass properties are exchanged between the two dimensions.

 

The Role of the Higgs Boson:

 

The Higgs boson in this theory would serve as a mediator or messenger between our dimension and the parallel one. Instead of just existing within the Higgs field in our dimension, the Higgs boson would travel across the dimensional boundary, carrying energy and mass-related information between the particle and its counterpart in the parallel dimension.

• The Higgs boson could be seen as the particle that allows mass properties to be transferred between the two dimensions. It’s not just imparting mass to particles; it’s enabling the interaction between the particles and their counterparts in the other dimension. The energy exchange facilitated by the Higgs boson would, in turn, give the particle its mass.

 

Mass as a Cross-Dimensional Effect:

 

Mass, in this theory, doesn’t simply arise from the interaction of a particle with the Higgs field as we currently understand it. Instead, mass is a result of the strength of the interaction between a particle and its counterpart in the parallel dimension. This strength is determined by several factors:

1. The number of particles involved in the interaction. More massive objects would have more particles interacting with their counterparts, thus creating a stronger connection between the two dimensions.

2. The alignment and distance between the particles in both dimensions. A particle might experience a stronger connection if its counterpart is “closer” or aligned in a certain way, leading to variations in mass.

3. The energy density of the particle system. Higher-energy particles might experience a stronger or more complex interaction with their counterparts, which could manifest as increased mass.

 

Gravity as a Cross-Dimensional Phenomenon:

 

In this framework, gravity could be reinterpreted as a result of the interaction between particles and their counterparts across dimensions. Here’s how:

• Gravity is the result of the tethering of mass between the particles and their counterparts in the parallel dimension. The more particles an object has, the stronger the tethering to the counterpart dimension, and the greater its gravitational effect.

• For example, a massive object like a planet has a large number of particles whose counterparts are strongly tethered to the other dimension. This increases the gravitational effect because the “pull” between the particle-counterpart pairs is stronger.

• This could suggest that gravity is not just a force within our dimension, but also a result of the interaction between our dimension and the parallel one.

 

Black Holes and the Collapse of the Bridge:

 

One of the most fascinating aspects of this theory is that it might offer a new perspective on black holes. In this model:

• Black holes could represent the collapse of the Higgs bridge. The extreme gravitational forces near a black hole might distort or sever the connection between particles and their counterparts, leading to the phenomenon of infinite mass density at the singularity.

• Inside a black hole, the tethering between particles and their counterparts might collapse or become so strong that it results in spacetime singularity, where known physics breaks down. This could explain why the laws of physics don’t seem to hold up inside black holes and why they remain such a mystery.

 

Fluctuations and Variations in Mass:

 

This theory also suggests that mass could fluctuate depending on the strength of the connection between particles and their counterparts in the parallel dimension. For example:

• In regions of strong gravitational fields—such as near black holes or during high-energy particle collisions—this interaction could become more pronounced. Particles might gain or lose mass based on how they are interacting with their counterparts. This could be observable in high-energy particle experiments.

• Mass variability could potentially explain some cosmological phenomena, such as the formation of galaxy clusters or the behavior of dark matter. Dark matter, in this context, could be linked to particles whose counterparts in the parallel dimension are less tethered, affecting the gravitational effects we observe.

 

Testing the Theory:

 

While this remains speculative, the Bridge Theory could offer a way to predict new behaviors in particle physics and cosmology:

1. High-Energy Experiments: Looking for anomalies in particle collisions or unexpected interactions between particles in accelerators could provide indirect evidence of cross-dimensional effects.

2. Gravitational Studies: Investigating gravitational anomalies near massive objects or black holes could reveal deviations from traditional gravitational models, which could be explained by the influence of a parallel dimension.

3. Quantum Gravity and Cosmology: The theory might have implications for our understanding of quantum gravity and cosmological observations, especially in relation to the structure of spacetime and the behavior of mass at both small and large scales.

 

In Conclusion:

 

The Bridge Theory proposes a new way of understanding mass, gravity, and the Higgs field. Rather than simply giving mass to particles in our universe, the Higgs field might act as a bridge to a parallel dimension, where particles are tethered to their counterparts. This interaction between particles and their counterparts could explain the mass of a particle, the strength of gravity, and even offer new insights into the nature of black holes and dark matter.

 

While this is a speculative hypothesis, it opens the door for new thinking about fundamental questions in physics, and it could potentially be tested through experiments and observational data in the future.

 

This deeper explanation should help clarify how the theory connects the Higgs field, mass, and parallel dimensions while providing additional context for the ideas presented.

Edit:

Updated Higgs Bridge Theory Incorporating New Discoveries

 

Core Idea:

The Higgs Bridge Theory posits that the Higgs field isn’t just a simple field that imparts mass to particles, but rather acts as a bridge between parallel dimensions. Particles and their counterparts in these dimensions interact through bosons that mediate the connection, influencing the mass and gravity we observe. The frequency and strength of this interaction (i.e., how often the boson “moves” across dimensions) determines the mass of a particle and its gravitational interaction.

 

Integration of Multi-Lepton Anomalies

 

The multi-lepton anomalies observed at the LHC suggest that certain particles, when decaying, deviate from the Standard Model predictions. This implies the presence of new physics that could be explained by interdimensional interactions. These anomalies may arise because:

1. New Bosons: The anomalies hint at the possible existence of new bosons, some of which are heavier than the Higgs boson and could play a central role in the transfer of mass and energy between particles and their counterparts across dimensions. These new bosons could be mediators of the Higgs Bridge, linking particles to their counterparts in the parallel dimension. They could explain the observed deviations in particle decay channels by facilitating new types of energy transfers between the dimensions.

2. Energy Transfer Across Dimensions: The deviations could be interpreted as particles transferring energy or mass to their counterparts across dimensions through these newly discovered bosons. These energy transfers could cause variations in lepton decay rates as particles fluctuate between dimensions.

 

New Bosons and Their Role in the Higgs Bridge Theory

 

The discovery of new bosons that are associated with decay processes—specifically those that decay into photons and Z bosons—offers direct support for the idea that particles can interact across dimensions.

1. Boson Intermediaries: These new bosons could act as the particles mediating the Higgs Bridge. Just as the Higgs boson interacts with the Higgs field to impart mass, these new bosons could facilitate cross-dimensional interactions by transferring particles to their counterparts in the parallel dimension. This interaction could change how mass is generated and how gravity operates on a macroscopic scale.

2. Mass and Frequency of Interaction: The frequency of interaction between a particle and its counterpart in a parallel dimension (mediated by these new bosons) directly affects the mass of the particle. In regions where the interaction frequency is higher (i.e., the particle is more tightly tethered to its counterpart), the particle gains more mass. In regions with a weaker connection or greater distance, the mass is reduced. This tethering effect could provide an explanation for observed mass variances in decaying particles, especially in the context of the multi-lepton anomalies.

 

Incorporating Gravity into the Higgs Bridge Theory

 

1. Gravity as a Cross-Dimensional Force:

The Higgs Bridge does not just affect the mass of particles; it also plays a role in gravity. The more massive an object becomes (due to stronger cross-dimensional interactions or closer proximity to its counterpart), the stronger its gravitational pull. Gravity could thus be seen as a force that arises due to the tethering of particles between parallel dimensions. The greater the mass, the more frequent the interaction between the dimensions, thereby producing stronger gravitational effects.

2. Black Holes:

The discovery of these new bosons could also help explain the behavior of black holes. In your theory, black holes could be regions where the Higgs Bridge collapses under the intense mass and energy, leading to a breakdown of the interaction between dimensions. This collapse could produce intense gravitational effects as particles and their counterparts are unable to “connect” properly across the dimensions.

3. Dark Matter and Dark Energy:

The deviations in particle decay could also be linked to dark matter and dark energy, which are still mysterious in current physics. If the Higgs Bridge involves particles and their counterparts in a parallel dimension, dark matter could be made up of particles in the other dimension that are interacting with our universe through these new bosons. This might provide an explanation for the missing mass observed in galaxies.

 

Mathematical Representation of the Higgs Bridge Theory with New Boson Discoveries

 

1. Energy Transfer Across Dimensions:

The energy and mass transfer across dimensions could be modeled by the following equation:

 

E_{\text{total}} = \sum_{i} \left( \frac{m_i v_i}{d} \right)

 

Where:

 

• E_{\text{total}} is the total energy or mass of a particle as it moves between dimensions.

• m_i is the mass of each particle in the system.

• v_i is the velocity of the particle’s interaction across dimensions.

• d is the distance between the particles and their counterparts in the other dimension. The larger the distance, the weaker the interaction.

 

2. Gravitational Force:

Gravity in this framework can be represented as:

 

F_{\text{gravity}} = \frac{G m_1 m_2}{r^2} \times \left( 1 + \delta \left( \frac{1}{d} \right) \right)

 

Where:

 

• G is the gravitational constant,

• m_1 and m_2 are the masses of two interacting particles,

• r is the distance between them,

• \delta is a factor that incorporates the frequency or strength of interaction between the two particles and their counterparts across dimensions,

• d is the distance between the two parallel dimensions, which affects how strongly the particles interact.

 

Conclusion: Potential Impact on Physics

 

• New Boson Discovery: The new boson and multi-lepton anomaly findings could directly support the existence of the Higgs Bridge, linking particles to their counterparts across dimensions and explaining deviations from the Standard Model.

• Gravity as an Interdimensional Phenomenon: The theory provides a novel perspective on gravity as an interdimensional force, linking the masses of objects to their counterparts in parallel dimensions.

• Energy Transfer and Mass Generation: The frequency and strength of particle interactions across dimensions, mediated by these new bosons, could explain mass generation, energy transfer, and gravitational 

[swansont]

You need to fix your equation formatting so it renders properly. 

You mention frequency. Frequency of what, exactly? What is oscillating? 

If the Higgs coupled to some other dimension — something not in the current theory — that would affect the Higgs. Shouldn’t that shift the mass? Why was it discovered where it was expected?

Your focus on gravity for variable mass is probably misplaced; gravity is very weak. We should see effects in atomic and nuclear systems. We have lots of data from accelerator experiments already. Why don’t we see the evidence in existing experiments?

[joigus]

1 hour ago, TheBridge said:

I’ve used ChatGPT to help clarify and refine my thoughts, as English isn’t my first language.

That was your first mistake. ChatGPT, as far as I can see, can only mimic human thinking based on previous patterns of human thinking that it's been fed.

No wonder it led you to parallel dimensions, which is not a new idea, was tried for more than gravitation, and AFAIK belongs in the junkyard of discarded ideas.

Thought-generating patterns must be fed something external. That something is experiment.

[TheBridge]

2 hours ago, swansont said:

You need to fix your equation formatting so it renders properly. 

You mention frequency. Frequency of what, exactly? What is oscillating? 

If the Higgs coupled to some other dimension — something not in the current theory — that would affect the Higgs. Shouldn’t that shift the mass? Why was it discovered where it was expected?

Your focus on gravity for variable mass is probably misplaced; gravity is very weak. We should see effects in atomic and nuclear systems. We have lots of data from accelerator experiments already. Why don’t we see the evidence in existing experiments?

Equation Formatting and Definitions

 

Thank you for catching the formatting issues. I’ll make sure to clarify and reformat to enhance readability.

 

Frequency and Oscillations

 

In the Higgs Bridge Theory, the frequency refers to the oscillation rate or the “tethering frequency” of the Higgs boson as it “bridges” between dimensions. This oscillation represents the interaction rate between a particle and its hypothetical counterpart in a parallel dimension, where particles oscillate across this bridge, affecting their mass properties in our dimension.

 

Potential Effects on the Higgs Boson’s Mass

 

If the Higgs field does indeed connect to a parallel dimension or if the Higgs boson oscillates across dimensions, then logically, this interdimensional coupling should influence the mass of the Higgs itself. You’re absolutely correct that the mass of the Higgs boson was discovered precisely where the Standard Model predicted. This observation would require that any interdimensional effects are subtle enough not to disrupt this mass prediction — or that the bridge is so delicate it doesn’t significantly affect the boson’s observable mass. Alternatively, it could suggest that the interdimensional coupling doesn’t act directly on the Higgs boson’s mass but rather on the frequency of interactions between particles in different dimensions, indirectly contributing to the observed particle mass in a way that is consistent with the Standard Model.

 

Implications for Gravity and Existing Data

 

The focus on gravity here is less about asserting that gravity directly changes due to interdimensional effects and more about suggesting that massive objects might experience amplified interdimensional interactions due to increased particle density. However, as you’ve rightly pointed out, gravity is indeed a very weak force relative to atomic and nuclear interactions, and any effects we’re theorizing should manifest in atomic and nuclear systems first.

 

This theory would imply that if particles are interacting across dimensions, these effects should indeed show up in accelerator data or other particle interaction experiments. The lack of anomalies in atomic and nuclear data might suggest:

1. The Higgs bridge theory’s interactions are weak or subtle enough to fall within experimental noise.

2. The coupling might only manifest at certain energy levels or scales not yet accessible.

 

Addressing Existing Data and Experimental Gaps

 

Moving forward, it would be crucial to make concrete predictions that can be experimentally tested, potentially focusing on high-energy particle collisions where any interdimensional effects might emerge more clearly. The multi-lepton anomalies recently observed at CERN might hint toward new interactions or forces that could be aligned with the Higgs Bridge Theory’s predictions, though more data is needed.

 

In summary, the main challenge is that the theory must not only explain gravitational effects but also align with current Standard Model results in atomic and nuclear physics. The predictive power of this theory would rely on identifying areas where current models fall short or predicting specific, measurable deviations in particle behavior that could confirm or refute the existence of these interdimensional bridges.

1 hour ago, joigus said:

That was your first mistake. ChatGPT, as far as I can see, can only mimic human thinking based on previous patterns of human thinking that it's been fed.

No wonder it led you to parallel dimensions, which is not a new idea, was tried for more than gravitation, and AFAIK belongs in the junkyard of discarded ideas.

Thought-generating patterns must be fed something external. That something is experiment.

Thank you for your perspective. I want to clarify that the parallel dimensions concept, as part of the Higgs Bridge Theory, originated from my own theorizing. ChatGPT was used solely to help refine language and structure to convey my ideas more clearly.

 

Experiment and External Validation

 

I agree that theories in physics should be grounded in experimental data. While this concept is speculative, the aim is to align it with potential experimental findings, such as multi-lepton anomalies, as well as current gaps in the Standard Model. My approach here is to outline a hypothesis that might inspire ideas for future testing or shed light on areas where our models currently fall short.

[swansont]

31 minutes ago, TheBridge said:

In the Higgs Bridge Theory, the frequency refers to the oscillation rate or the “tethering frequency” of the Higgs boson as it “bridges” between dimensions. This oscillation represents the interaction rate between a particle and its hypothetical counterpart in a parallel dimension, where particles oscillate across this bridge, affecting their mass properties in our dimension.

That’s word salad. What is it about this interaction that makes it vary in time? 

[Mordred]

For starters Higgs is a quartic field the mass couplings differ for W+, W- and Z bosons leaving one field uncoupled.

This is confirmed via experiments so equation 1 is incorrect.

Your equation for higher dimensions doesn't include any higher dimensions.

In physics a dimension is not an alternate reality or other such item but refers to effective degrees of freedom 

Example {ct, x,y,z) has 5 values that can alter without any dependency on the other variables.

I do not know what ChatGPT is placing in for the right right statements I can only assume Dirac Bra-ket notation.

For latex on this site use 

\[latex\*] just remove the * I placed there to prevent activation.

As mentioned DO NOT rely on ChatzGPT it's nothing more than a glorified search engine

You will not be able to show higher dimensions using the definition for dimension I provided using Newtonian mathematics all your equations would fall under scalar field treatment and do not have the vector and spinor relations for particle field interactions.

The closest statement you have to a vector is the inner product in equation 1 but that equation is still wrong 

Edited November 10 by Mordred

[TheBridge]

10 minutes ago, swansont said:

That’s word salad. What is it about this interaction that makes it vary i

 

In the Higgs Bridge Theory, the idea is that any kind of “frequency” in the Higgs interaction would need to be based on real, physical principles. If there’s an oscillation, it has to come from something concrete, like field dynamics or interactions that vary over time for specific reasons.

1. Field Dynamics: The Higgs field could have fluctuations or variations based on changes in field strength or configurations—basically, conditions that might vary at high energies or extreme densities. This fluctuation could be what we’re interpreting as a “frequency.”

2. Different Particle States: If the Higgs field connects “dimensions” in any way, it has to do so through something measurable—maybe by coupling particles in different states or energy levels. In this framework, what we call “frequency” could refer to the rate at which energy shifts occur between these states, potentially altering the observed mass.

12 minutes ago, Mordred said:

For starters Higgs is a quartic field the mass couplings differ for W+, W- and Z bosons leaving one field uncoupled.

This is confirmed via experiments so equation 1 is incorrect.

Your equation for higher dimensions doesn't include any higher dimensions.

In physics a dimension is not an alternate reality or other such item but refers to effective degrees of freedom 

Example {ct, x,y,z) has 5 values that can alter without any dependency on the other variables.

I do not know what ChatGPT is placing in for the right right statements I can only assume Dirac Bra-ket notation.

For latex on this site use 

\[latex\*] just remove the * I placed there to prevent activation.

As mentioned DO NOT rely on ChatzGPT it's nothing more than a glorified search engine 

For starters, in the Higgs framework, we’re dealing with a quartic field. The mass couplings differ for W^+, W^-, and Z bosons, and one field is left uncoupled. Experimental confirmation backs this, so Equation 1 here doesn’t hold.

 

On higher dimensions: if we’re actually including higher dimensions, we should see those degrees of freedom in the math. In physics, a “dimension” isn’t some alternate universe or parallel reality; it’s an independent variable in a system, something that can vary without affecting others. For example, in (ct, x, y, z), each term is an independent coordinate.

[Mordred]

Yes that's what I wrote try adding your own statements and I don't  need you to rewrite my statements.

I know quite well the mathematics for both gravity and the Higgs field.

The Higgs field does not account for all the mass terms of the Standard model which means it does not account for all mass involved in gravity only roughly 1 percent of the mass of a single proton for example.

So regardless of dimensionality it cannot account for all elements involved in gravity as it does not account for all the mass

For example equation 1 will not work with the three primary Higgs field cross sections

Higgs cross sections partial width's

\[\Gamma(H\rightarrow f\bar{f})=\frac{G_Fm_f^2m_HN_c}{4\pi \sqrt{2}}(1-4m^2_f/m^2_H)^{3/2}\]

\[\Gamma(H\rightarrow W^+ W^-)=\frac{GF M^3_H\beta_W}{32\pi\sqrt{2}}(4-4a_w+3a_W^2)\]

\[\Gamma(H\rightarrow ZZ)=\frac{GF M^3_H\beta_z}{64\pi\sqrt{2}}(4-4a_Z+3a_Z^2)\]

These cross sections above describe all the Higgs field interactions The first term is the interaction between Higgs and other fermions such as leptons.

the next two are the bosons W+,W- and Z

This should be a strong indication that your math is insufficient for the task

as an assist here is the Higgs electroweak couplings.

\[(\frac{g}{2}\vec{\tau}\cdot\vec{W}+\frac{\acute{g}}{2} B)\phi_0\]

this equation involves wavefunctions and Fourier transformations so include tensors for the associated fields

 

 

Edited November 10 by Mordred

[studiot]

4 hours ago, TheBridge said:

• Particles in our universe have counterparts in parallel dimensions, connected by the Higgs field.

 

50 minutes ago, TheBridge said:

In physics, a “dimension” isn’t some alternate universe or parallel reality; it’s an independent variable in a system, something that can vary without affecting others. For example, in (ct, x, y, z), each term is an independent coordinate.

 

Please make up you mind and also revise your terminology.

 

x, y and z are not parallel they are orthogonal variables. That is why they are independant.

[TheBridge]

47 minutes ago, Mordred said:

Yes that's what I wrote try adding your own statements and I don't  need you to rewrite my statements.

I know quite well the mathematics for both gravity and the Higgs field.

The Higgs field does not account for all the mass terms of the Standard model which means it does not account for all mass involved in gravity only roughly 1 percent of the mass of a single proton for example.

So regardless of dimensionality it cannot account for all elements involved in gravity as it does not account for all the mass

For example equation 1 will not work with the three primary Higgs field cross sections

Higgs cross sections partial width's

 

Γ(H→ff¯)=GFm2fmHNc4π2–√(1−4m2f/m2H)3/2

 

 

Γ(H→W+W−)=GFM3HβW32π2–√(4−4aw+3a2W)

 

 

Γ(H→ZZ)=GFM3Hβz64π2–√(4−4aZ+3a2Z)

 

These cross sections above describe all the Higgs field interactions The first term is the interaction between Higgs and other fermions such as leptons.

the next two are the bosons W+,W- and Z

This should be a strong indication that your math is insufficient for the task

as an assist here is the Higgs electroweak couplings.

 

(g2τ⃗ ⋅W⃗ +g´2B)ϕ0

 

this equation involves wavefunctions and Fourier transformations so include tensors for the associated fields

 

 

Thanks for helping you have been the nicest person i have spoken to about this all day.

I have not claimed that this is true or a new field i was just speculating as this is the speculation board after all.

Thanks though!!!!

[Mordred]

no problem its why we have a Speculation forum is to help others learn as well as assist in how to properly model a new theory.

[swansont]

1 hour ago, TheBridge said:

I have not claimed that this is true or a new field i was just speculating as this is the speculation board after all.

Well, that’s not going to work. The speculations forum has standards; it’s not the wild guess forum. If it’s not thought to be true you’re just wasting everyone’s time.

2 hours ago, TheBridge said:

In the Higgs Bridge Theory, the idea is that any kind of “frequency” in the Higgs interaction would need to be based on real, physical principles. If there’s an oscillation, it has to come from something concrete, like field dynamics or interactions that vary over time for specific reasons.

So what’s oscillating? This tells us nothing. It sounds like more ChatGPT dreck.

You need to post your equations; I didn’t see any time-dependent variables in them, but could have missed that. If there’s no time dependence, how is there oscillation?

2 hours ago, TheBridge said:

1. Field Dynamics: The Higgs field could have fluctuations or variations based on changes in field strength or configurations—basically, conditions that might vary at high energies or extreme densities. This fluctuation could be what we’re interpreting as a “frequency.”

Why would the Higgs field oscillate? 

2 hours ago, TheBridge said:

2. Different Particle States: If the Higgs field connects “dimensions” in any way, it has to do so through something measurable—maybe by coupling particles in different states or energy levels. In this framework, what we call “frequency” could refer to the rate at which energy shifts occur between these states, potentially altering the observed mass.

Why don’t we observe this oscillation in mass? How could this be tested?

[Wild_Assistant_4104]

One it can be agreed IMHO chatGTP is not at fault..

If particle were defined as P(ast)article ie P.article 

Then

Parallel Universe would be closed systems like this site and Reddit or YouTube or any closed system.

Then

Mass wait(weight) would be the time chatGTP would be able to link information from parallel Universal ie two websites as one user then frequency being the copied and paste function of an outside force like a word document or notepad.

If you understand basic language structure of English and he stated it was not his FIRST language and apparently everyone is trying to help.. here is HOW the Alphabet Placement English System was set up for and we all did it....

Enjoy 18m46s I presented the video to help OP English understanding logic and an alternative view that we are ultimately as a group having a conversation with that chatGTP via his interpreter... I believe the video hold merit IMHO

The video is for education purposes only and is Creative Commons Zero the new public domain and a great song I wanted to add is Andy Grammer SAVED MY LIFE

 

[exchemist]

5 hours ago, Wild_Assistant_4104 said:

One it can be agreed IMHO chatGTP is not at fault..

If particle were defined as P(ast)article ie P.article 

Then

Parallel Universe would be closed systems like this site and Reddit or YouTube or any closed system.

Then

Mass wait(weight) would be the time chatGTP would be able to link information from parallel Universal ie two websites as one user then frequency being the copied and paste function of an outside force like a word document or notepad.

If you understand basic language structure of English and he stated it was not his FIRST language and apparently everyone is trying to help.. here is HOW the Alphabet Placement English System was set up for and we all did it....

Enjoy 18m46s I presented the video to help OP English understanding logic and an alternative view that we are ultimately as a group having a conversation with that chatGTP via his interpreter... I believe the video hold merit IMHO

The video is for education purposes only and is Creative Commons Zero the new public domain and a great song I wanted to add is Andy Grammer SAVED MY LIFE

 

Not only is this mad nonsense but the video is hilarious, with a voiceover slowed to half speed while someone does a Darth Vader impression in the background (unless it's a video made by somebody in an iron lung).