ThomasNghiem Posted December 14 Posted December 14 This manuscript is submitted solely for feedback and is not intended for publication in any editorial journal. To streamline the review process, only the proving section is included, with non-technical components such as the Introduction, Abstract, and References removed. Readers are invited to provide constructive feedback on both the solution and the writing style. Suggestions, such as merging subcases, eliminating the Methodology section, or simplifying the essay for conciseness, are particularly welcome. Your insights will greatly enhance the clarity and rigor of this work. This proof has been available as a preprint on ResearchGate, where readers can review the original work and timestamped authorship here. GoldBach_2024_new_6_short.pdf
swansont Posted December 14 Posted December 14 ! Moderator Note Rules require the material for discussion be posted, rather than just linked to (be it a file or url)
ThomasNghiem Posted December 15 Author Posted December 15 On 12/13/2024 at 8:12 PM, swansont said: ! Moderator Note Rules require the material for discussion be posted, rather than just linked to (be it a file or url) I attached the file with my post already
swansont Posted December 15 Posted December 15 9 hours ago, ThomasNghiem said: I attached the file with my post already ! Moderator Note And I’m pointing out that that’s not following our rules ”members should be able to participate in the discussion without clicking any links” ”Documents must also be accompanied by a summary, at minimum.” (from rule 2.7)
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now