Understanding time, time dilation, what are galaxies, and the fourth dimension

[Frank Martin DiMeglio]

A four dimensional SPACE is (CLEARLY) electromagnetic/gravitational  ON/IN BALANCE (consistent WITH TIME AND TIME dilation).

UNDERSTANDING TIME DILATION AND WHAT IS THE FOURTH DIMENSION:

The average density of the Sun being roughly one-quarter that of Earth is consistent with the fourth dimension and the equations E=mc^2 and F=ma, AS gravity/acceleration involves WHAT IS BALANCED inertia/inertial resistance consistent WITH TIME, TIME dilation, AND WHAT IS the fourth dimension !!!! Indeed, the stars AND PLANETS are POINTS in the night sky. The fourth dimension IS consistent WITH two AND three dimensional SPACE in fundamental equilibrium AND BALANCE. Excellent !!!! (INDEED, consider WHAT IS THE EYE. GREAT !!!!) TIME IS NECESSARILY possible/potential AND actual ON/IN BALANCE !!!!

By genius Frank Martin DiMeglio

Edited Monday at 02:16 PM by Frank Martin DiMeglio
Aid with reader comprehension

[swansont]

Any science to post? Or is this just wand-wavy shouting?

[Phi for All]

55 minutes ago, Frank Martin DiMeglio said:

A four dimensional SPACE is (CLEARLY) electromagnetic/gravitational  ON/IN BALANCE (consistent WITH TIME AND TIME dilation).

UNDERSTANDING TIME DILATION AND WHAT IS THE FOURTH DIMENSION:

The average density of the Sun being roughly one-quarter that of Earth is consistent with the fourth dimension and the equations E=mc^2 and F=ma, AS gravity/acceleration involves WHAT IS BALANCED inertia/inertial resistance consistent WITH TIME, TIME dilation, AND WHAT IS the fourth dimension !!!! Indeed, the stars AND PLANETS are POINTS in the night sky. The fourth dimension IS consistent WITH two AND three dimensional SPACE in fundamental equilibrium AND BALANCE. Excellent !!!! (INDEED, consider WHAT IS THE EYE. GREAT !!!!) TIME IS NECESSARILY possible/potential AND actual ON/IN BALANCE !!!!

By genius Frank Martin DiMeglio

!

Moderator Note

Please read the rules for our Speculations section. You need to include some kind of supportive evidence in your explanation that persuades us that you have a point to make. The above doesn't come close.

 

!

Moderator Note

Also, let me deal with the Report you made re swansont's request for actual science. It wasn't obnoxious or idiotic, it was a couple of questions from a retired physicist about your OP. It wasn't false or misleading information, it was a couple of questions about your lack of rigor. It's also NOT nonsense or harassment, it's part of the rules you agreed to when you joined. Please do better.

 

[Frank Martin DiMeglio]

Bye Bye idiots. You can't be that stupid, but you are definitely an ass.

[MigL]

Saying 'Good Bye' got you a +1

[exchemist]

27 minutes ago, MigL said:

Saying 'Good Bye' got you a +1

Very good. This nutcase has actually published a book: https://authorfrankdimeglio.blogspot.com/2013/06/author-frank-dimeglio-is-real-agenda-of.html

The link is quite funny. After several tirades from Frank, somebody else shows up to ask: "Are you a real person?".😆  

And that is the sole comment from anyone other than Frank.