If it was Big Bang, then Quantum Physics is Myth

[Sandeep Chavan]

Big Bang: A Beautiful Myth or an Incomplete Theory?

Introduction

The Big Bang theory is one of the most celebrated explanations of the universe's origin. However, could this widely accepted cosmological model conflict with the fundamental principles of quantum physics? Can we reconcile the deterministic mechanics of relativity with the probabilistic nature of the quantum world? These questions invite us to critically evaluate the foundations of the Big Bang hypothesis.

As we delve into this fascinating paradox, consider this provocative thought: "If it was Big Bang, then Quantum Physics is Myth." Let’s explore why.

1. The Singular Paradox: A Beginning Without a Cause

• The Big Bang posits that the universe began as a singularity—a point of infinite density and temperature.
• Quantum physics, however, rejects infinities as physically meaningful. The uncertainty principle demands finite, probabilistic states, not deterministic singularities.
• Question to the Reader: How can we reconcile a singularity with the inherently probabilistic nature of quantum mechanics? Does the Big Bang demand a leap of faith that quantum physics does not permit?

2. Time and the Illusion of "The Beginning"

• The Big Bang places time as beginning at the singularity, yet quantum physics introduces the concept of timeless quantum states, where energy fluctuations occur independently of classical time.
• If time emerges from quantum interactions, how can it "begin" at a point defined by classical relativity?
• Provocative Insight: The Big Bang requires time to emerge from nothing, but quantum systems suggest that time is a localized construct tied to interactions, not an absolute starting point.

3. Quantum Superposition vs. The Singularity's Certainty

• The Big Bang implies a deterministic singularity that transitioned into a universe governed by probabilistic quantum mechanics.
• Quantum physics operates on principles like superposition and entanglement, which cannot exist in a singularity with infinite density and zero-dimensional space.
• Key Question: If the universe began in a state that defies quantum principles, when and how did quantum physics "begin"?

4. The Problem of Inflation and Fine-Tuning

• The Big Bang's inflationary phase requires extremely precise initial conditions to explain the observed uniformity of the cosmic microwave background radiation.
• Quantum physics thrives on uncertainty and probability, yet inflation assumes a finely tuned scalar field to explain rapid expansion.
• Logical Challenge: Can a theory requiring such precise fine-tuning coexist with quantum mechanics, which inherently resists deterministic precision?

5. Entropy and the Arrow of Time

• The Big Bang describes an initial state of extremely low entropy, from which the universe evolves into higher entropy states.
• Quantum systems suggest entropy emerges from local interactions, not from a singular global condition.
• Philosophical Dilemma: Does the Big Bang imply a preexisting order (low entropy) that quantum mechanics would need to explain? Or does it bypass quantum considerations altogether?

6. Beyond the Big Bang: A Call for Rethinking

• While the Big Bang explains many observable phenomena, such as cosmic expansion and background radiation, it leaves unanswered questions about causality, quantum compatibility, and the true nature of time.
• Alternative Thinking: If we step back from the Big Bang, can we envision a framework where quantum principles and universal dynamics coexist without contradictions?

Conclusion: An Invitation to Reimagine Cosmology

The statement "If it was Big Bang, then Quantum Physics is Myth" is not a dismissal of the Big Bang's achievements but a call to critically examine its assumptions in light of quantum principles. As science evolves, so must our models of the universe. The path forward lies in reconciling the deterministic and probabilistic, the macroscopic and quantum.

Are we ready to rethink the origin of everything?

[Phi for All]

2 hours ago, Sandeep Chavan said:

Are we ready to rethink the origin of everything?

Did ChatGPT tell you the BBT was an origin theory? It's not. It says nothing about what happened at T=0. And just because we use T=0, it doesn't mean time emerges from nothing. 

[swansont]

3 hours ago, Sandeep Chavan said:

Are we ready to rethink the origin of everything?

No.

Having unanswered questions does not mean a theory is wrong. In this case, physics takes us back to about 10^-43 sec after the big bang. And reconciliation of GR with QM is held up because GR is a classical theory, so why not point your finger at that? QM works really well where it’s applicable.

(and if you are using ChatGPT please review the rules, particularly 2.13, which limits the use of ChatGPT and its siblings)