Maximum7 Posted Monday at 10:07 PM Posted Monday at 10:07 PM The Jeans instability is the collapse of a cloud of gas or dust. Recently, a vSauce short claimed that if you wanted to destroy the Sun, you would need to spread its material far enough that it wouldn't recollapse into a star again. vSauce gives the number at 10 AU (Astronomical units) I usually trust vSauce but I have no clue how he got this number and I can't find any additional sources supporting it. Is 10 AU correct? Jeans instability - Wikipedia How To Destroy The Sun
Genady Posted Monday at 10:33 PM Posted Monday at 10:33 PM 25 minutes ago, Maximum7 said: I have no clue how he got this number and I can't find any additional sources supporting it. A short Internet search returns many sites explaining how to calculate Jeans length. Just plug in the numbers.
swansont Posted Monday at 10:56 PM Posted Monday at 10:56 PM 49 minutes ago, Maximum7 said: if you wanted to destroy the Sun, you would need to spread its material far enough that it wouldn't recollapse into a star again Oh, is that all you’d have to do? </sarcasm>
TheVat Posted yesterday at 12:33 AM Posted yesterday at 12:33 AM Since it's about balancing thermal energy and gravitational work, I would think V Sauce (Mike Stevens) would need a way to obtain the thermal energy after the sun has been spread around - seems tricky, given we don't know what energy inputs would be (and losses) to achieve this drastic effect. (more a Veritasium fan, myself, and Derek Muller has a stronger CV for talking about physics imo) The approximation (simplified) formula for Jeans' length is r being the cloud radius. And the T, as I said, is the tricky one. I get 30 inches. Wait.... that's my jeans length. Sorry.
Maximum7 Posted yesterday at 12:34 AM Author Posted yesterday at 12:34 AM 2 hours ago, Genady said: A short Internet search returns many sites explaining how to calculate Jeans length. Just plug in the numbers. I’m looking at the equation right now. I don’t know if the temperature of the gas would be the same as the sun itself.
Genady Posted yesterday at 12:43 AM Posted yesterday at 12:43 AM 7 minutes ago, Maximum7 said: I’m looking at the equation right now. I don’t know if the temperature of the gas would be the same as the sun itself. What do you mean, temperature of the Sun?
swansont Posted yesterday at 01:45 AM Posted yesterday at 01:45 AM 2 hours ago, Maximum7 said: I’m looking at the equation right now. I don’t know if the temperature of the gas would be the same as the sun itself. Fusion would stop and you’re causing an expansion of the gas. So lower, but the sun doesn't have a uniform temperature. As TheVat implied, it’s not a trivial exercise to determine that.
Genady Posted yesterday at 10:54 AM Posted yesterday at 10:54 AM 40 minutes ago, Ammaniya said: Yes, 10 AU is correct! Knowing this, one can calculate the gas temperature.
Maximum7 Posted yesterday at 01:54 PM Author Posted yesterday at 01:54 PM 3 hours ago, Ammaniya said: Yes, 10 AU is correct! You did it? The math checks out?!
swansont Posted 23 hours ago Posted 23 hours ago 17 hours ago, Maximum7 said: The Jeans instability is the collapse of a cloud of gas or dust. Recently, a vSauce short claimed that if you wanted to destroy the Sun, you would need to spread its material far enough that it wouldn't recollapse into a star again It’s not clear here if you think 10 AU is how far you need to disperse the material. The wikipedia article says “All scales larger than the Jeans length are unstable to gravitational collapse, whereas smaller scales are stable” which implies spreading the material far apart would be an unstable situation. What’s happening is that by spreading the material out the density drops, increasing the Jeans length, but the size of the cloud is smaller than 10AU, so the thermal energy exceeds the magnitude of the gravitational energy. The Jeans length is where they are equal. (It also seems that the analysis ignores the role of inelastic scattering in the process, which I’m sure astrophysicists have noticed, so it’s a more subtle situation, that is, the Jeans length would not be constant in time for a given mass and size) 1
Ammaniya Posted 4 hours ago Posted 4 hours ago 20 hours ago, Maximum7 said: You did it? The math checks out?! No... Pff, I did not. But everywhere I googled and tried finding, I was told that it CAN be correct, and at some places it did say that it is correct, so idk... Sorry if I overthrow.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now