Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

I wonder what @JohnDBarrow thinks about the Bishop of Washington's sermon to Trump, extolling the virtues of traditional Christian compassion towards immigrants and people of differing sexual orientations. Seems Trump is hopping mad about being reminded of what the New Testament has to say. 

Is Christianity part of the "culture and traditions"  of America, or not, I wonder? 

Posted
17 hours ago, Sensei said:

starting a war with the Denmark

It wouldn’t be a war with Denmark, it would be a war with the European Union. People here wouldn’t look kindly on an act of military aggression against any of our member states, and I dare say neither would the rest of the international community. Given the level of national debt of the US, and the degree to which its economy relies on foreign trade, such a move would be…ahem…unwise.

Posted
2 hours ago, Markus Hanke said:

such a move would be…ahem…unwise.

Who said Donald is wise.. ? ;)

After watching this:

Musk-Small-Cut.gif.7063d0bd2e3d9f3fedb249bbce415989.gif

..a wise person would say "WTF, what are you doing, you idiot!"..

 

Posted
59 minutes ago, Sensei said:

..a wise person would say "WTF, what are you doing, you idiot!"..

In Germany, giving the Hitler salute is a criminal offence - mostly you’d get fined, but technically it could earn you up to three years in prison. Either way you’re left with a criminal record upon conviction.

But yeah, he probably thinks he’s making America great again.

Posted
21 minutes ago, Markus Hanke said:

In Germany, giving the Hitler salute is a criminal offence - mostly you’d get fined, but technically it could earn you up to three years in prison. Either way you’re left with a criminal record upon conviction.

Same here. 2 years.
Musk is no longer welcome in Europe.

 

Posted

I know the OP is gone, but came across a counterpoint to his "Dylan will have to change his lyrics" babble.

The Band (Canadian/American) "Up on cripple creek"

Quote

When I get off of this mountain
You know where I wanna go?
Straight down the Mississippi River
To the Gulf of Mexico...

Given who's pushed that silly name change, and who the OP voted for, I found this amusing. YMMV.

  • 4 weeks later...
Posted
On 1/18/2025 at 10:30 AM, JohnDBarrow said:

Eskimo Pie is no longer. The Cleveland Indians are no longer. The Washington Redskins are no longer. The cook on the Cream of Wheat box is no longer. Aunt Jemima is no longer. ESKIMO is a fun word. INDIAN is a fun word. The COOK made Cream of Wheat fun to eat. Ford got rid of the MERCURY trademark because it is a Roman god which might offend folks of other faiths. PONTIAC was Native American so General Motors axed it. PLYMOUTH is gone from Chrysler Motors because the name sounds too Anglo-Saxon. The OLD in OLDSMOBILE might have offended the anti-ageism crowd. Who knows?

I hate it when there are those woke-sters who make every effort to rid America of her unique heritage and culture. My mother always bought Eskimo Pie. All that said, I will NEVER buy an Edy's Pie! Fat Boy and Klondike with the polar bear on the label are fine by me.

PS - The Woke Police and others on the Left are out to take away anything that is FUN!
 


 

Could you please tell us where you got the idea that the Mercury trademark was retired because it might offend someone on religious grounds?  As far as I know, all the major auto manufacturers consolidated their various brand names for economic reasons. 

You are just as free as anyone else to vote with your dollars.  You are just as free as anyone else to interpret names and symbols any way you wish, including fun or harmless. 

  Did you bother to express your feelings directly to the private companies, or are you just here to
waste time and energy?  No one here can put Uncle Ben back on the box.

The danger posed by Woke / PC agenda is far greater than merely "taking away anything that is fun".

I think you might appreciate a brief eight minute long YouTube video entitled "Socrates Died for Your Sins"

This video explains why censorship in any form for any reason is an evil.

 

 

 

Posted
1 hour ago, bearcat22 said:

The danger posed by Woke / PC agenda is far greater than merely "taking away anything that is fun".

 

Can you please post this dangerous agenda you refer to? I'm interested in reading it and knowing who developed it.

Posted
On 1/18/2025 at 9:53 AM, Phi for All said:

You should watch some David Attenborough docs. He'll convince you that diversity is the key to the survival of life on this planet.

Uh, no, it is not.  Unless you are a DT / Maga supporter because Dem ideology got him elected.  

People thought "civil interaction" in trade & travel were the key to survival.  Those "civil interactions" were at an all time high in 1914, just before the most deadly period of carnage in history began.  

Equal treatment, trade & travel, are all great, but they won't prevent the next explosion that should kill ~ 2 billion.  

Ideology does not solve a problem that has defied the best scholars in international relations for centuries.  The cause of human conflict has not been solved.  It needs a major intellectual effort from a diverse group of scholars, keeping avenues of feedback open to the periphery in case there is an Alan Turing out there.  Then we might solve it & you can be certain that ideology won't.   Otherwise, the SHTF is on the way, regardless of what party is in office.  Of course, a bad enough actor can move it up.

4 hours ago, bearcat22 said:

The danger posed by Woke / PC agenda is far greater than merely "taking away anything that is fun".

Maybe so, but it is primarily dangerous at this point because it got the right wing elected that may be worse.  

The extreme right, and the extreme left were the ones that committed the worst genocides in history.  Both sides do bad things & both sides delude themselves into thinking the ideology of their tribe is some kind of absolute truth, when it is not. 

Posted
On 1/18/2025 at 10:30 AM, JohnDBarrow said:

hate it when there are those woke-sters who make every effort to rid America of her unique heritage and culture

A nation of immigrants, founded by immigrants, always a multicultural mixing pot. That's Americans heritage. 

As for all those companies that changed product names etc etc etc, sounds a lot like people practicing their fundamental 1st amendment rights to me. 

For the sake of a reasonable discussion, let's start of with some simple definitions. How exactly do you define "woke"? What exactly is "woke" ideology to you?

Posted
12 hours ago, bearcat22 said:

The danger posed by Woke / PC agenda is far greater than merely "taking away anything that is fun".

What danger? Can't be putting brown people into concentration camps since it's the right trying to do that. Where is the danger? Where is the existential threat exactly? I see none. 

2 minutes ago, Genady said:

 

Ahhhh, makes sense. Talking to a brick wall now. Thanks for the heads up!

Posted

The "woke agenda" is a fictitious RW caricature of civil rights, equal opportunity, and teaching actual history instead of patriotic fairy tales.  Woke, in its actual meaning, simply means being awake to the systemic problems in America that perpetuate discrimination and racism.   IOW, it really just means pulling your head out of your ass.

Posted
43 minutes ago, TheVat said:

The "woke agenda" is a fictitious RW caricature of civil rights, equal opportunity, and teaching actual history instead of patriotic fairy tales.  Woke, in its actual meaning, simply means being awake to the systemic problems in America that perpetuate discrimination and racism.   IOW, it really just means pulling your head out of your ass.

Right. The fact that a word and phrase that comes from ebonics is the one being demonized, shouldn't be lost on anyone. Definitionally it is no different to being aware, but people still use the term "awareness campaign" and the term "raise awareness" without batting an eye. Even heard the phrase "raise awareness of the dangers of wokism" like what? raise awareness of the dangers of being aware? Are you broken? 

As far as I'm concerned, anyone telling you awareness itself is the enemy, is someone trying to benefit from your lack of awareness. It's easier to steal from and abuse the blind and the sleeping than those who are awake. 

Posted
47 minutes ago, TheVat said:

The "woke agenda" is a fictitious RW caricature of civil rights, equal opportunity, and teaching actual history instead of patriotic fairy tales.  Woke, in its actual meaning, simply means being awake to the systemic problems in America that perpetuate discrimination and racism.   IOW, it really just means pulling your head out of your ass.

Also, it wouldn't really matter. Let's assume that folks just caved in and now suddenly decide to ignore civil rights issues, then there would be something else they would disagree on. And the only way to address that would be to have exactly the same social outlook. At which point we would only have on one party and full Gleichschaltung. Which, presumably is the goal. From this perspective it is a bit silly to state that folks were driven to the far right because of woke or whatever. Because it minimizes the actual reason. Folks want a society with inequality, as long as they have a shot of being on top of others. We do see it with how folks use anti-abortion laws as cudgels to reduce women's rights and put them in diminished and increasingly dangerous roles. At some point we really should start calling a spade a spade and not pretend that folks are unwittingly doing things. 

Posted
17 hours ago, bearcat22 said:

The danger posed by Woke / PC agenda

In addition to the requested agenda, please define “woke”

13 hours ago, dedo said:

Maybe so, but it is primarily dangerous at this point because it got the right wing elected that may be worse.  

Stated without evidence (which should happen in a different thread)

13 hours ago, dedo said:

The extreme right, and the extreme left were the ones that committed the worst genocides in history.  Both sides do bad things & both sides delude themselves into thinking the ideology of their tribe is some kind of absolute truth, when it is not. 

Both sides fallacy, strawman, and also, no evidence. (also arguably off-topic)

 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.