There are still two cosmological models

[Seten]

One of two possible cosmological models is true, and both have two different ways of going about two problems in modern physics; quantifying dark matter and dark energy, and unifying relativity with quantum mechanics. 

1. Steady State Cosmology:

Ideally this would go about quantifying dark matter and dark energy by ruling them both out as a misunderstanding about what light actually is. I used integral/differential calculus to create a new power-rule which solved the three-body problem. Conceptually, I defined light as a planck-volume with the potential to become a graviton in the event that two or more of these planck-volumes were to partially superimpose one another, an event in which a gravitational field is created. This assumption only conceptually works as producing an anti-gravitational field because partially superimposing one volume with another volume forces the surrounding space to expand in order to maintain its density, and so the graphical evolution of this geometry is perceived as going against our arrow of time. If two planck-volumes were to superimpose one another entirely then energy could be consumed/erased by the anti-gravitational slingshot of any peripheral planck-volumes upon partially superimposing a secondary planck-volume. In this part of the graphical animation, I witnessed an effect identical to that of quantum tunnelling. Basically, what we observe as neutrinos are really just photons on an extremely local scale; what happens is an extreme redshift (extreme enough for the observation of cosmological redshift in receding galaxies to be discarded as an "optical illusion" due to a localized gravitational redshift of extreme magnitude). Steady state cosmology is a level one multiverse on the Tegmark scale and as such will invite Obler's paradox; however, because this localized quantum tunnelling of light produces a type of gravitational redshift extreme enough to reinterpret the observation of cosmological redshift in receding galaxies it also combats Obler's paradox using "tired light". The cosmic event horizon is also explained away as "tired light". 

Third Eye Interpretation of the Double Slit Experiment

The supposed steady state model goes about unifying relativity with quantum mechanics by reinterpreting the observer effect again as an optical illusion. Upon flipping the arrow of time, the light sent by the second camera in the experiment travels through the electrons that were fired during the experiment and are absorbed into what will later become a third light source. Between the firing of the primary light source (the light emitted by the camera photographing the interference pattern on the wall) and the secondary light source (the light fired at the electrons by a second camera in order to follow the path of the electrons that were fired at the wall up until they passed through the two slits between the first camera and the wall) a tertiary light source (that has gone through the adjacent electrons that were fired at the wall to create the interference pattern) is created. Therefore, whenever a collapse of the wave function is demonstrated, when we are seeing what appears to be two strips of electrons; what we are actually looking at is the entire interference pattern of electrons. 

This steady state model goes about explaining the origin of the universe as an event existing outside of our normal understanding of time; that is, as time had no beginning this event lies along an imaginary point in the chronological timeline of the universe. Existence is defined as reality imagining its own geometry, zero dimensions are imagined as points, single dimensions are imagined as these points extruded into lines, double dimensions are imagined as these lines are extruded into planes, triple dimensions are imagined as these planes are extruded into volumes, and finally a quadruple dimension is imagined as all of these volumes change their residual positions through time. This existential unfolding of geometry follows Murphy's law to its ultimate conclusion, which is manifested as an infinite amount of light travelling through an infinite amount of space and coalescing at certain points (much like the yellow vacuum depicted in Obler's paradox) producing what will become the supermassive black holes at the centers of galaxies. These events are not unlike the theorized "Kugelblitz black hole". At these locations in space a tetrational number of planck volumes become entirely superimposed. These black holes do not evaporate in this model; because there are no nonlocal superpositions as Stephen Hawking understood them in the Coppenhagen interpretation of the double slit experiment and therefore there is no particle-pair production within a perpetually collapsing “point-like singularity” or even a “Planck star”. These singularities are what's known as "Planck cores". Any light entering into the proximity of these event horizons is still able to escape, however, because; like the aforementioned quantum tunnelling effect, this kind of gravitational slingshot can cause the velocity of a photon to temporarily exceed the superluminal rate of pull induced by the gravitational field of that same singularity due to the displacement of velocity induced by the mass of the singularity being equivalent to a "superluminal addition of relativistic velocities". As the trajectories of these photons are curved around the Planck core, they become partially superimposed enough so that the warped energy acquires a mass and therefore becomes matter as the first protons, neutrons, and electrons are ejected from these event horizons. These elementary particles then coalesced to form the first star-birthing nebulae, along with the first planets.  

For the actual math please pm me. 

2. Modified LCDM - There exists a negative arrow of time within a perpetually collapsing singularity. Dark matter is the result of particles originating in the future being added into the present universe. Dark energy is mass that has been ejected from the current universe as it exceeded the speed of light and was teleported into the past inside eternally collapsing singularities all the way back until material from every singularity at every point in time combines into one infinitely large “Initial singularity” residing at the beginning of the universe. The observer effect is the result of every electron being one particle, assuming a different configuration when a second observer is added to the experiment. The Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle is essentially the notion that the entire universe are 4 particles (one up quark, one down quark, one electron, and one gluon) cloning themselves as they travel back and forth through time and interacting with each other to create the 3 fundamental interactions while also experiencing mass and generating energy as they interact. Particle pair production, Heisenberg's uncertainty principle, being the result of a gravity in a singularity accelerating these particles back through time. This modification was what Stephen Hawking truly envisioned, if I had to wager. 

Both of these models are no less plausible than the last in my mind. However; the latter has paradoxes, whereas the former does not. However, the former needs math I don't want to show publicly which is probably why this topic might be locked. Due to the nature of the topic, I know it will be sent to speculations either way. 

Edited Monday at 07:22 AM by Seten

[swansont]

8 hours ago, Seten said:

For the actual math please pm me. 

!

Moderator Note

No, that’s not how it works here. You post it here

 

8 hours ago, Seten said:

Basically, what we observe as neutrinos are really just photons on an extremely local scale

That’s not in accordance with mainstream physics. You can’t discuss a house-of-cards hypothesis. You need to establish the base before moving on.

Photons and neutrinos are quite different items.

And you have other dubious claims you have to address before moving on.