TheVat Posted 6 hours ago Posted 6 hours ago 39 minutes ago, Sensei said: ..and do you believe (buy) such lies.. ? Show me public posts, threads, groups, etc. about child pornography on Telegram. Provide the URL to such content on Telegram. The mailman's job is not to check every package before it is delivered to make sure it does not contain illegal materials.. If two child rapists make two accounts on SFN, and later send PM ("private messages") between each other, should Dave, Swansont, Phi For All be arrested.. ? You seem to say 'yes' to such approach.. First, it may not be the mailman's job, but the postmaster general who runs the US postal service does have to be responsible and assist law enforcement in stopping the mailing of illegal materials. This is a normal part of law enforcement in most places - indeed, protecting people from criminal harm is a primary goal of society. So your analogy doesn't really work there, but it helped me get my point across. Secondly, I am not posting "lies." These events are public record. News outlets are governed by libel and slander laws. If they reported wrongly, they could be sued for millions. I'm sorry their reports don't fit your worldview in which Durov is some kind of free speech saint. Third, I cannot cite and post child exploitation/porn messages which have been intercepted by law enforcement - do you understand why evidence to be shown at a court trial is not shared with the public before trial? If you can't understand that, I really can't help you. Your SFN child rapist analogy does not really seem analogous to what Durov was allowing or his uncooperative stance with law enforcement. The owner of this site is a physician and I am confident he would cooperate with the authorities, if SFN were to become a major messaging center for drug cartels, child porn, and organized RW violence against immigrants. Your prior posts here usually seem intelligent and helpful, but I suspect that your understanding of the law is somewhat less than of information technology.
swansont Posted 5 hours ago Posted 5 hours ago 17 hours ago, Sensei said: Nonsense. If the authority steps in and says to IT company “give me all your data between X and Y” or give me all the data of “X” (the client).. It's all a matter of IT It’s IT if how they do it is under discussion. But it’s not.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now