bearcat22 Posted 20 hours ago Posted 20 hours ago Premises: World wide energy consumption is rising rapidly and will continue to do so; Energy distribution infrastructure upgrades are not keeping pace with increasing demand; Imported fuels have net negative economic effects to the American economy; Energy has a strong impact upon American political policy Imported fuels make America vulnerable to unstable world politics Energy producers wield too much influence over government energy policy Given those premises being accepted, questions: If there were no government subsidies, which method of generating electricity on a wide scale would be most practical? By practical, I mean produce the greatest net gain, taking into consideration: Efficiency Distribution / transmission from source to use Overall long and short term pollution Profitability Fuel Independence (fuel harvested inside America, not imported) Sustainability Speed and simplicity of building more supply of that type of power source &&&& Feel free to also comment on: OPEC embargos Economic collapse of Venezuela due to over reliance on oil exports Corn/Ethanol and American elections Brazil burning sugar instead of gasoline in vehicles Exxon Valdez Enron Military budget to protect foreign oil supply French vs German nuclear power policy Ukraine: lithium, uranium and billions in military aid Defeat of consumer owned power plants, such as Pine Tree initiative in Maine Solar power harvesting satellites and transmission loss Fracking and rapidly diminishing fresh water supply in America Carbon offset market Bringing things to people, instead of an economy designed around each person having to pay for their own vehicle to chase things; arcologies The book: $20 per Gallon Strategic energy reserves held by Federal Government Railroads vs. Trucks Home waste digesters to make methane for fuel &&&&&&&&& Could nuclear power plants be located far enough from population that a radiation leak would be insignificant? Store the waste right next to the remotely located power plant? Instead of power cables, which have transmission loss over distance, charge huge batteries instead, shipping these batteries via a railway supply loop from plant to end use location, returning to be recharged when depleted. &&&&&&&&&&&
swansont Posted 43 minutes ago Posted 43 minutes ago 19 hours ago, bearcat22 said: Premises: World wide energy consumption is rising rapidly and will continue to do so; Energy distribution infrastructure upgrades are not keeping pace with increasing demand; Imported fuels have net negative economic effects to the American economy; Energy has a strong impact upon American political policy Imported fuels make America vulnerable to unstable world politics Energy producers wield too much influence over government energy policy Given those premises being accepted ! Moderator Note Those are statements of a factual nature, which need to be supported before this continues “rising rapidly” is vague; it’s a number that can be quantified. Details matter.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now