Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

The article in the attached file says that microwaves were used to create a quantum entanglement between two macroscopic mechanical oscillators. But what is the specifications of the microwaves used? Wavelength, intensity, whether it is lidar-level specific or a range of frequencies that can be produced by common microwave sources, and so on?

 

Posted
5 hours ago, Methaneontitan said:

The article in the attached file says that microwaves were used to create a quantum entanglement between two macroscopic mechanical oscillators. But what is the specifications of the microwaves used? Wavelength, intensity, whether it is lidar-level specific or a range of frequencies that can be produced by common microwave sources, and so on?

 

If you want a reply you need to post the relevant text here. It's one of the forum rules that readers should not have to good off-site to open files from unknown sources. Is this an extract from an online journal? If so you could post a link to that.  

Posted
!

Moderator Note

I've removed the attachment, as it was a .htm file which does not comply with rule 2.7

If you want to post a link, do so, but the salient details should be posted here. Including the article title, authors, and abstract 

 
Posted
1 hour ago, swansont said:
!

Moderator Note

I've removed the attachment, as it was a .htm file which does not comply with rule 2.7

If you want to post a link, do so, but the salient details should be posted here. Including the article title, authors, and abstract 

 

Title: Direct observation of deterministic macroscopic entanglement

Authors: Shlomi Kotler, Gabriel A. Peterson, Ezad Shojaee, Florent Lecocq, Katatina Cicak, Alex Kwiatkowski, Shawn Geller, Scott Glancy, Emanuel Knill, Raymond W. Simmonds, José Aumentado and John D. Teufel.

 

Abstract: Quantum entanglement of mechanical systems emerges when distinct objects move with such a high degree of correlation that they can no longer be described separately. Although quantum mechanics presumably applies to objects of all sizes, directly observing entanglement becomes challenging as masses increase, requiring measurement and control with a vanishingly small error. Here, using pulsed electromechanics, we deterministically entangle two mechanical drumheads with masses of 70 picograms. Through nearly quantum-limited measurements of the position and momentum quadratures of both drums, we perform quantum state tomography and thereby directly observe entanglement. Such entangled macroscopic systems are poised to serve in fundamental tests of quantum mechanics, enable sensing beyond the standard quantum limit, and function as long-lived nodes of future quantum networks.

 

Link: https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/science.abf2998

 

So, what are the specifications of the microwaves in the experiment?

Posted
44 minutes ago, Methaneontitan said:

Title: Direct observation of deterministic macroscopic entanglement

Authors: Shlomi Kotler, Gabriel A. Peterson, Ezad Shojaee, Florent Lecocq, Katatina Cicak, Alex Kwiatkowski, Shawn Geller, Scott Glancy, Emanuel Knill, Raymond W. Simmonds, José Aumentado and John D. Teufel.

 

Abstract: Quantum entanglement of mechanical systems emerges when distinct objects move with such a high degree of correlation that they can no longer be described separately. Although quantum mechanics presumably applies to objects of all sizes, directly observing entanglement becomes challenging as masses increase, requiring measurement and control with a vanishingly small error. Here, using pulsed electromechanics, we deterministically entangle two mechanical drumheads with masses of 70 picograms. Through nearly quantum-limited measurements of the position and momentum quadratures of both drums, we perform quantum state tomography and thereby directly observe entanglement. Such entangled macroscopic systems are poised to serve in fundamental tests of quantum mechanics, enable sensing beyond the standard quantum limit, and function as long-lived nodes of future quantum networks.

 

Link: https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/science.abf2998

 

So, what are the specifications of the microwaves in the experiment?

Details are given in the paper. See notes to Fig 1. which define fc, fm1 and fm2. The system is simultaneously irradiated with 2 frequencies:  fc+ fm1 and  fc- fm2. 

I'm unclear why you could not see this. 

Posted
3 hours ago, exchemist said:

Details are given in the paper. See notes to Fig 1. which define fc, fm1 and fm2. The system is simultaneously irradiated with 2 frequencies:  fc+ fm1 and  fc- fm2. 

I'm unclear why you could not see this. 

The note defines fc as 6.0806 GHz, fm1 as 10.9 MHz and fm2 as 15.9 MHz. I see no addition of fc to fm1 or subtraction of fm2 from fc in the note. It appears in the note as if fc was something they created together. What frequencies were the drums irradiated with in order to create the entanglement in the first place, and is lidar-level narrowness of the frequency band necessary to create entanglement on demand? I am asking about the frequencies used to create the entanglement, not to demonstrate it.

Posted (edited)
1 hour ago, Methaneontitan said:

The note defines fc as 6.0806 GHz, fm1 as 10.9 MHz and fm2 as 15.9 MHz. I see no addition of fc to fm1 or subtraction of fm2 from fc in the note. It appears in the note as if fc was something they created together. What frequencies were the drums irradiated with in order to create the entanglement in the first place, and is lidar-level narrowness of the frequency band necessary to create entanglement on demand? I am asking about the frequencies used to create the entanglement, not to demonstrate it.

It's all described in the text. The note defines the 3 frequencies and the text explains how they were combined. 

The relevant section starts "To entangle the two drums, we irradiate the cavity with two pulses simultaneously......"

 

 

Edited by exchemist
Posted
6 hours ago, Methaneontitan said:

So, what are the specifications of the microwaves in the experiment?

The frequencies are given, as are the pulse durations.

The power levels might be described in a previous paper; I notice several Teufel papers in the references.

I’m not sure what lidar has to do with your inquiry; they mention the microwave resonator; the frequency width is going to be determined by the details of that circuit.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.