Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

I'm glad you like it.

 

Just a reminder to everyone, Zarkov has apparently admitted it to be pseudoscience, and the definition of pseudoscience (and the forums description) is a system of theories, assumptions, and methods erroneously regarded as scientific. (Marriam-Webster)

Posted

:scratch: What proves an idea is scientific better than repeatable tests?

Devise a test for psuedoscience and have it repeatable, preferably on Earth. Then it will be taken serious.

A lot of anamolies in the macrocosom make theorists constantly change the way they think. Each new discovery messes things up. Fertile ground for new ideas.

Propose a way to test your idea once you have one.:slaphead:

Then get back to real science.

1000 posts:rolleyes:

Just aman

  • 5 months later...
  • 3 weeks later...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.