bloodhound Posted October 12, 2005 Posted October 12, 2005 Define [math]\Lambda(n):=\log(p)[/math] if n is a power of a prime p and 0 if n = 1 or n is a composite number Prove that [math]\Lambda(n)=\sum_{d|n}\mu(\tfrac{n}{d})\log(d)[/math] The hint says to look at [math]\sum_{d|n}\Lambda(d)[/math] and apply the Mobius inversion formula. So far I have got [math]\sum_{d|n}\Lambda(d)= \sum_{i=1}^r \log(p_i)= \log(\prod_{i=1}^r p_i)[/math] assuming that n has r distinct primes in its expansion. So help Don't mind the above, I have figured it out. I will post more questions if any in this thread instead.
bloodhound Posted October 12, 2005 Author Posted October 12, 2005 New question: [math]\sigma_k(n)=\sum_{d|n} d^k[/math] It was asked to show that sigma is multiplicative, which I have done. I have to find a formula for it which is where I am stuck.
Dave Posted October 12, 2005 Posted October 12, 2005 Why not break down n into: [imath]n=p_1^{e_1} \cdots p_n^{e_n}[/imath]?
bloodhound Posted October 12, 2005 Author Posted October 12, 2005 Trouble is that there are so many possible divisors of n, I have trouble keeping track of all of them.
shmoe Posted October 13, 2005 Posted October 13, 2005 You've shown [math]\sigma_k[/math] is mutiplicative so it's enough to evaluate it on prime powers, which is just a geometric series.
bloodhound Posted October 13, 2005 Author Posted October 13, 2005 Yep, I figured it out. I didn't realise sigma k was just sum of divisor function for k=1 for which we have already done the formula.
Dave Posted October 13, 2005 Posted October 13, 2005 Sorry, I should probably have said that I meant each pi to be prime
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now