akcapr Posted October 12, 2005 Posted October 12, 2005 How can you tell which is a stronger reducer? For example, the question was which is the best reducer: Iron, Osmium, Ruthnium or some other metal. The point is, how can you tell? I kno alkali metals are good reducers and as they get bigger they get even better, but does that have a correlation to all of the other metals? btw the answer was Fe
woelen Posted October 12, 2005 Posted October 12, 2005 For the transition metals you can say that the metals of the first row are much better reductors than the corresponding metals of the second and third rows. This is true for all of these metals (i.e. Sc to Zn and all metals in between, including Fe).
jdurg Posted October 13, 2005 Posted October 13, 2005 I believe that you can also look at the electronegativities of the metals. The lower in magnitude the electronegativity is, the greater the reducer it is. Look at fluorine gas as an example. It has the highest electronegativity, therefore it is the worst reducing agent in existance. Cesium is one of the best reducers because it has such a miniscule electronegativity.
akcapr Posted October 13, 2005 Author Posted October 13, 2005 Are there any patterns in electronegativity for the transition metals?
budullewraagh Posted October 13, 2005 Posted October 13, 2005 i'd look at electromotive potentials, not electronegativities.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now