BriVaps Posted October 29, 2005 Share Posted October 29, 2005 anybody out there working with this type of physics? is it for real? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
swansont Posted October 29, 2005 Share Posted October 29, 2005 The same physics that tells you it's real tells you that you can't tap into it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BriVaps Posted October 30, 2005 Author Share Posted October 30, 2005 http://www.spiritofmaat.com/announce/meg.htm `its patented by the US patent office Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nevermore Posted October 30, 2005 Share Posted October 30, 2005 That is complete bullsh*t. It violates the law of conservation. Matter can niether be created nor destroyed. And, since E=MC^2, Matter=Energy=Matter. Therefore, there is no energy without fuel. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ecoli Posted October 30, 2005 Share Posted October 30, 2005 http://www.spiritofmaat.com/announce/meg.htm `its patented by the US patent office yep' date=' complete load of crap. This device is simply not real... and definately doesn't do what they say it does. We are announcing an event of historical nature. It occurred on March 26, 2002 — a day that will probably go down in history as being equally important to the quality of life on Planet Earth as that faraway, unknown moment when our ancestors discovered how to make fire. How come I don't remember that day being significant at all? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
swansont Posted October 30, 2005 Share Posted October 30, 2005 http://www.spiritofmaat.com/announce/meg.htm `its patented by the US patent office Getting a patent isn't all that difficult, as long as you avoid calling it a perpetual motion machine. If the machine works, why aren't they everywhere? Is it time to invoke a conspiracy explanation? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
insane_alien Posted October 30, 2005 Share Posted October 30, 2005 omfg the world has gone to hell in a tutu Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JohnB Posted November 1, 2005 Share Posted November 1, 2005 I couldn't get the link to work. That is complete bullsh*t. It violates the law of conservation. Matter can niether be created nor destroyed. And, since E=MC^2, Matter=Energy=Matter. Firstly, matter can indeed be created and destroyed, you are thinking of energy. Secondly, you're assuming the "visible" Universe is a closed system. Can you prove this is so? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nevermore Posted November 2, 2005 Share Posted November 2, 2005 Matter and energy are the same thing. Get your facts straight. And that remark about the universe is completely irrelivent, off topic, and I said nothing about the universe anyway. I am in no mood to deal with idiocy. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
swansont Posted November 2, 2005 Share Posted November 2, 2005 Matter and energy are the same thing. No, they aren't. Photons, for example, aren't matter. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Royston Posted November 2, 2005 Share Posted November 2, 2005 I couldn't get the link to work. Firstly' date=' matter can indeed be created and destroyed, you are thinking of energy. Secondly, you're assuming the "visible" Universe is a closed system. Can you prove this is so?[/quote'] Our galaxy is an isolated system, so what happens on larger scales is not accessible to shape our technology. Nevermore, did you mean to say particles make up matter and energy ? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
insane_alien Posted November 2, 2005 Share Posted November 2, 2005 the galaxy is NOT a closed system. i think our galaxy is actually in the process of ripping up a wee tiny galaxy right now Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Royston Posted November 2, 2005 Share Posted November 2, 2005 I thought it was closed enough to not have an effect on the conservation of energy. This is why this device will never work. I didn't realise the first law spread to outer regions. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Royston Posted November 2, 2005 Share Posted November 2, 2005 Duplicate...double oops Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bascule Posted November 2, 2005 Share Posted November 2, 2005 its patented by the US patent office Which doesn't mean jack. For example: http://patft.uspto.gov/netacgi/nph-Parser?Sect1=PTO1&Sect2=HITOFF&d=PALL&p=1&u=/netahtml/srchnum.htm&r=1&f=G&l=50&s1=5,443,036.WKU.&OS=PN/5,443,036&RS=PN/5,443,036 A method for inducing cats to exercise consists of directing a beam of invisible light produced by a hand-held laser apparatus onto the floor or wall or other opaque surface in the vicinity of the cat, then moving the laser so as to cause the bright pattern of light to move in an irregular way fascinating to cats, and to any other animal with a chase instinct. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
swansont Posted November 3, 2005 Share Posted November 3, 2005 Which doesn't mean jack. For example: http://patft.uspto.gov/netacgi/nph-Parser?Sect1=PTO1&Sect2=HITOFF&d=PALL&p=1&u=/netahtml/srchnum.htm&r=1&f=G&l=50&s1=5' date='443,036.WKU.&OS=PN/5,443,036&RS=PN/5,443,036[/quote'] I don't know what's worse - that the patent exists, or that there are nine other patents that reference it. But I like that one of the inventors is Amiss. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now