Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Evidently no continuous function will do as any continuous image of a compact set is compact, and I think that is your problem with trying to figure this out.

 

Existence proof:

 

consider the maps i:[0,1] to R the inclusion and j:R to [0,1] which is the composition of the inverse tan function, which maps R bijectively with (-pi/2,pi/2) followed by adding pi/2 to map it to (0,pi) bijectively, followed by dividing by pi. j is an injection from R to [0,1] thus we have injections between the two sets and hence there exists some bijection by cantor-schroeder bernstein.

 

writing one directly.

 

notice that we can easily get a bijection between (0,1) and R using the tan trick. so we just need one from [0,1] to (0,1) and that is the standard trick:

 

map 0 to 1/3, 1/3 to 1/5, 1/5 to 1/7 etc .....

 

map 1 to 1/2, 1/2 to 1/4, 1/4 to 1/6...etc

 

leave x fixed if x has not been mentioned

 

this is a bijeciton from [0,1] to (0,1)

Posted
Evidently no continuous function will do as any continuous image of a compact set is compact' date=' and I think that is your problem with trying to figure this out.

 

Existence proof:

 

consider the maps i:[0,1'] to R the inclusion and j:R to [0,1] which is the composition of the inverse tan function, which maps R bijectively with (-pi/2,pi/2) followed by adding pi/2 to map it to (0,pi) bijectively, followed by dividing by pi. j is an injection from R to [0,1] thus we have injections between the two sets and hence there exists some bijection by cantor-schroeder bernstein.

 

writing one directly.

 

notice that we can easily get a bijection between (0,1) and R using the tan trick. so we just need one from [0,1] to (0,1) and that is the standard trick:

 

map 0 to 1/3, 1/3 to 1/5, 1/5 to 1/7 etc .....

 

map 1 to 1/2, 1/2 to 1/4, 1/4 to 1/6...etc

 

leave x fixed if x has not been mentioned

 

this is a bijeciton from [0,1] to (0,1)

 

Thanks a lot! I must warn you that I will probably swamp this board with questions on Algebra and Topological spaces in the coming days. :rolleyes:

Meanwhile, I'll go read up on the cantor schroeder bernstein theorem. I just hope it's not too complicated.

Posted

cantor-scroeder bernstein, or whatever the correct spelling is, is an obviously true theorem, though that is different from a trivially true theorem.

 

it states that if we partially order sets by X <= Y if X injects to Y then X <=Y and Y<=X implies X=Y, which we all agree is 'obviously' true. the proof is not hard to understand but it is very clever.

 

however, it is easy to write down a bijection directly, as i did, as long as you remember the tricks and that you've got to stop thinking of 'nice' functions.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.