daisy Posted September 25, 2003 Share Posted September 25, 2003 What do you think is a better approach in research (and why): a) Use a technique you're highly experienced in to test many different systems/theories, or b) Use many different techniques to explore the particular problem/area you are interested in. I ask this because I think if you want to make money in science you choose path a) but if you are really into academic research and problem solving you'll choose path b). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dudde Posted September 28, 2003 Share Posted September 28, 2003 I think you're right on with that statement Daisy. If I were trying to make money (because that's all science is these days:-p commies) I would use technique A, because it would be the most efficient to enhance the educational value of the process however, I would choose B. It would also heighten the entertainment I don't like repitition. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Glider Posted September 28, 2003 Share Posted September 28, 2003 I think using the technique appropriate to the problem is best. If the problem requires a triangulation approach, then use it. If not, don't (it just wastes time and resources). I'm not sure I understand the question though; research methods have to be dictated by the topic under investigation. I don't see how what you are being paid to do the investigation can affect your choice of method(s). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
daisy Posted September 30, 2003 Author Share Posted September 30, 2003 Payment or financial gain was not really my main point....just my cynical view taking over. But I do know that there are some researchers who have a pet technique which they tend to use to investigate a broad range of questions within a particular field. Of course if your topic is highly specialised then it will dictate method but equally I know people who get bees in their bonnets about some newly developed technique and want to apply it to evrything they can get their hands on. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Glider Posted October 1, 2003 Share Posted October 1, 2003 Ahhh...gotcha...I know researchers like that. Same applies to kit. They get an expensive new toy and want to use it on everything, like firing up a new functional magnetic resonance imager to investigate a sick bee they found in the car park, kind of thing Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
YT2095 Posted October 1, 2003 Share Posted October 1, 2003 I must confess to being guilty of doing the same thing myself. The lastest was a new microscope I bought for myself, but in the same week the wife bought me a webcam, well after examining everything I could possibly think of around the lab and the house (including some rather obscenely biological stuff). I then made a mount so that I could veiw these things with my webcam and see them on the monitor instead of the eye peice, I now have a rather extensive set of .Jpegs of completely useless pictures of close up things I`m torn between "Boys and their toys" or Children will play" the wife recons the latter in my case Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now