sunspot Posted February 7, 2006 Posted February 7, 2006 MDT Cosmology MDT cosmology is a practical application of the MDT model. Some background for the MDT Model can be found under the topic Speculations, i.e., MDT Cube. To begin, there are two extreme states of the MDT model (CCC) and (000), or eternity and nothingness. The first has all three relativistic parameters at V=C implying infinite mass, distance and time relativity. Theoretically, this is all-inclusive and would include the finite universe, as well as all the other dimensions, parallel universes, etc. The second has all three relativistic parameters at V=0, and would define essentially nothing. This would be the state of our finite universe, before anything, including the primordial atom or whatever, was in the finite universe. The way MDT cosmology works is that the three variables of the model, M, D and T, one-by one decelerate from the V=C state of (CCC) to define finite, i.e., M, D, and T < C, but extreme parameters. The order of the variable slow down from C is not imperative, although the ordering will have an impact on the type of early universe that will result. Based on the three variables of the model this give us six possible combinations, i.e., MTD, TMD, DTM, TDM, MDT, and DMT. These are summarized in the table below. The first pair are (MTD) and (TMD). The first has mass potential appearing (mass) then time potential (heat). Finally distance potential appears (expansion). This is essentially the BB theory, i.e., continuum expansion. The second is similar with T appearing before M, with D also last. This imply heat (T) then mass (M) then expansion (D), which also defines BB. Because the first scenario has mass potential first, the mass potential will decay somewhat before time potential or heat is added. The result will be a more extended expansion of hotter lighter mass (open universe BB scenario). The second has T decaying more than M, implying a heavier somewhat cooler expansion (closed universe BB scenario). The second pair (DTM) and (TDM) show distance and time potential (wavelength and frequency), in two combinations appearing before mass potential. This shows an initial energy based cosmology appearing in the universe from which mass will eventually condense. This is similar to the Wave/Particle and String cosmology models. The first will have distance potential decaying more than time potential. This implies a smaller hotter energy field similar to the closed universe BB scenario. This is analogous to String Cosmology. The second has time potential decaying more than distance potential implying a larger but cooler energy field similar to the open universe BB scenario. This is analogous to Wave/Particle Cosmology. The past pair are (MDT) and (DMT). These are unexplored, what I call, quantum expansion/division models where the earliest universe breaks up into quantum chucks and space quantum jumps or expands, instead of being initially a continuum. The first has the mass potential decaying more than the distance potential implying a lighter mass expansion with more distant potential. While the second has the distance potential decay more than the mass potential implying a heavier mass expansion with less distance potential. The first scenario implies a quantum expansion/division of a mass singularity, to the galaxy level singularities, while the second scenario quantum expands/divides to superstructure level singularities. With the third parameter T initially staying at C during the two quantum expansion/division scenarios, the preliminary MD expansion of the universe occurs without heat or time. This implies that the MD aspect of the expansion does not occur via a force-based expansion, rather it occurs via entropy. Entropy into empty space looks like a repulsive force is acting but it is endothermic instead of exothermic. The endothermic expansion sets the potential for T to kick down from C. Before T kicks down, the entropy expansion occurs without time in the finite universe (there is only eternal time at C). This allows the universe to expand/subdivide without the inertial clock running (before t=0). Finite time as we know it, in these scenarios, begins when T kicks down below C. Essentially, the mass and distance potential of the universe, would be moderately (D then M) or widely (M then D) distributed before time, heat, force, etc, appear. When T does drops below C, a mini Big Bang phase will occur. This allows the universe to expand uniformly in all directions. All six scenarios are valid MDT cosmology models, each of which can form a finite universe. The observational data can help us decide which occurred during this current universe cycle. Back in the 50’s and 60’s the first two BB scenarios fit the known data the best. Later, as physics was able to learn more about the substructure of matter, was able to unify three of the forces, and could measure the background energy of space, the wave theories gained more acceptance, with the BB remaining consistent after some modifications. Because the Standard theory has had problems integrating gravity, the String Theory appeared to help the cause. The T then D then M scenario appears to relate to string theory with the early T then D somehow related to the vibration and distance nature of the strings. Over the past year, new data has appeared about galaxies forming rapidly, very early during the formation of the universe. Other data has showed some structured irregularity in the background microwave radiation, i.e., axis of evil. These new data suggest the need for the two quantum models. Of these two, the galaxy scale quantum expansion/division appears to best express the observation that the universe is uniform expanding with respect to the galaxies, i.e., galaxies are the primary currency denomination of the universe and would be the logical candidate for the Mini Big Bang expansion. This implies the MDT scenario, which the MDT model is named after. There is not enough superstructure data to currently favor the DMT scenario. However, the MDT cosmology is still flexible enough to accommodate any possible future data that might suggest that the superstructures formed before the galaxies. The next lesson, will look at one of the MDT scenario galaxy level quantum chunks when T falls from C and heat, time and unified force suddenly appear in the universe; the Mini Big Bang Phase.
sunspot Posted February 7, 2006 Author Posted February 7, 2006 I would like to add two practical considerations to MDT cosmology. The first consideration is, with the three variables dropping from C or the eternal (CCC) reference, why didn't we end up with infinite type potentials within the universe due to the conservation principle? The answer is due to the on-off nature between (000) (nothingness) and (0+, 0+, 0+) (near infintessimal MDT subunits behind the special relativity). The off aspect of the cycle etween (000) and (0+, 0+, 0+) results in less than infinite potential ending up in the universe. This is discussed in a little more detail in the MDT cube presentation. The second practical consideration has to do with why does an entropy expansion quantum divide/expand. Let us start with two extreme mass points. The first will be divided in half and separated a distance d. The second will be broken down into a continuum shell a distance d. Although the mass times d will be the same for both, the continuum shell will contain more entropy within all its particle diverstity. This implies that for the same amount of entropy the mass point divided into half can go a greater d than the continuum shell. This satifies the entropy potential into empty space at the fastest rate. The simpliest scenario to describe the quantum cosmology models is something similar to cell division. The mass potential subdivides into smaller and smaller mass potential points (primal spores) which quantum jump with space. This lays out the primal universe at the speed of light of the (M, D, T=C) or entropy wave/particle phase. When T drops from C, the primal spores change phase into something similar to mini Big Bangs, with the universe already spread out, ready to expand further via the high energy pressure waves that will result from the simultaneous mini big bang phase change.
sunspot Posted February 8, 2006 Author Posted February 8, 2006 Mini Big Bang Phase Change Before beginning this analysis is a logical extrapolation of the MDT model. The MDT model is very flexible in that it allows all cosmology orientations to meet on common ground. This analysis is an attempt to further extrapolate quantum cosmology, which at the present is very new. The mini big bang phase change occurs when T or time potential kicks down from the Vt=C. This will cause inertial time to begin ticking within the finite universe with the primal spores already spread out. It will also create the primal 3-D MDT particles, which will lead to the three long-lived stable particle (composites) of common matter, i.e., proton, neutron and electron. If we look at these three particles of common matter the electron is mostly distance potential, as reflected by its constant extended motion and velocity, it has high time potential (lasts a long time) and only a little mass potential. In MDT terminology the electron is generically written, DTm. The neutron has very low distance potential since it only interacts with stability at close quarters such as nuclei and neutron density. In MDT terminology the neutron is defined as TMd. The T or time potential coming before mass potential is indicative of the hot nature of neutrons as well as the observation that neutrons will be the last of the three particles still standing under the extreme gravity conditions of terminal stellar events. The proton is generically written MDt, which is the third possible combination of the three variables. Its moderate distance potential is due to its high mass, relative to the electron, lowering the velocity impact of the magnetic force stemming from its positive charge. The time potential of the proton, being last, is a little odd since protons are very long lived. This is probably due to the majority of protons in the universe within stellar type environments waiting to be fused into higher atoms, thereby lower the time, which they can exist in this ground state. In the MDT model of common matter, these ground states allow variability within the three parameters allowing all the observed common matter states to be defined. This will be a future topic. If we look at these three particles of common matter something interesting appears. Neutrons prefer very dense continuum environments. The electron exists as a particle/wave. While the proton is sort of quantum in nature in that it helps define the distinct quantum features like atoms and orbitals. As such, the mini big bang phase change probably involved the three cosmology model types, i.e., continuum, wave and quantum all occurring at the same time. This is shown in the figure below. Based on the current observed natures of the three main long phase particles of the universe, the first path would form the protons. Their quantum discontinuous nature has continued into the present as the foundation for the quanta called atoms and orbitals. The second path would form semi-stable neutrons. The dense expanding continuum is still paralleled by neutron stability being connected to dense continuum orientations such as nuclei and neutron density. The third path would form the electrons. This is the most obvious and is reflected by the continuing wave/particle nature of electrons. The first path or the path of the protons by being a loose inertial analog of the primal spores implies that the primal spores were very loosely analogous to massive positively charged phenomena. This probably gave them all the more reason to quantum divide and expand. Relative to the Mini Big Bang phase change, with all three paths acting to form the primal protons, neutrons and electrons, the pseudo-quantum division/expansion of the first path would add to the slow hot continuous expansion of the second path to create a semi discontinuous hot slow continuous expansion, i.e., primal nuclei fusion potential. The hot neutron phase would slowly decompose into hot protons and hot electrons making it additive to the first path. The third path will beat feet and outrun the first two paths. Since the third path will become electrons, as they leave the hot center and cool, their appearing negative charges will add an additional kick as electro-magnetic repulsion expansion. Because the very hot dual path center of the galaxy is only slowly expanding and cooling, the positive charges of the proton phase will take some time to appear, i.e., protons will only slowly lower their time and increase their distance potential. This means that for maybe hours, days, weeks or months (?) the third path electrons will be evacuating from the galaxy center and from each other. The evacuating electrons will cause the expanding galaxies to strongly repel each other, causing the universe to accelerate expand relative to the galaxies. When positive charge begins to appear within the semi-discontinuous continuous core, the positive charge repulsion will cause the core to expand and cool even faster. Further decomposition of the somewhat cooler neutrons into positively charged protons and negatively charged electrons will offer some resistance to the accelerated core expansion due to the electron sharing. The remote electrons will get the scent and begin flowing back toward the accelerating expanding core. The result will be the supercollider phase of galaxy evolution, burning off a very significant fraction of the primal common matter. This is where considerable transient phase (short-lived high energy exotic particles) would form. The final result will be primarily moderately high-energy hydrogen protons and high-energy electrons and gravity holding the galaxy clouds together. The supercollider phase energy output, due to the universe expansion relative to the galaxies, will create a time-delayed source of high-energy waves that will be eventually seen by the galaxies. This will create additional turbulence within the galaxies clouds.
sunspot Posted February 9, 2006 Author Posted February 9, 2006 MDT cosmology is an extension of Einstein's theory that the laws of physics are the same in all references, such that all the laws of the physics are adjusted between references via changes in only relativistic mass, distance and time. I called these three variables, MDT or mass distance and time potential, each of which are more than just mass, distance and time or else all the laws of physics could not be adjusted. What is unique about MDT cosmology is that it is all inclusive and can accommodate all the major theories. This is due to its integral instead of differential approach. The quantum cosmology model that was presented is also unique in that it brings together a wide range of theory into one integrated model. I have taken an integral approach to science. While most of science is based on a differential approach. These are two different approaches and philosophies and the conditions of proof are quite different. Let me give an example, a doctor may specialize (differential) in kidneys and through his research comes up with a medicine to treat a kidney ailment. But once he applies this medicine to a person, there are often side affects. The side affects indicate that the body is an integrated organism that is not composed of separated differential aspects. The medicine may not work in the context of the integrated whole, but still has use for kidneys, so the side affects are factored out by statistics, using benefit/liability analysis. Using an integral approach, I don't factor out the side affects. These are the data which show the integration. One person's garbage is another person's treasure. But it is as difficult for an integral approach to differentiate these subtle details to the satisifaction of a differential scientist, just as it is difficult for a differential scientists to explain why he is ignorring the integration of phenomena. Both approaches are parts of the whole, and need to work together.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now