Vigo Posted February 20, 2006 Posted February 20, 2006 How are metals put in their order on the order of metal activiyt? From what I can infer, it is how violently they react in a substance but I am not sure.
RyanJ Posted February 20, 2006 Posted February 20, 2006 How are metals put in their order on the order of metal activiyt? From what I can infer, it is how violently they react in a substance but I am not sure. Yes thats basically it. Its more correctly called the Activity Series, metals are listed in order of decreasing ease of oxidation and increased east of reduction http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reactivity_series Cheers, Ryan Jones
MulderMan Posted February 20, 2006 Posted February 20, 2006 Q: So the GCSE Science "Reactivity Series" is totally different to the real one? thanks.
RyanJ Posted February 20, 2006 Posted February 20, 2006 Q: So the GCSE Science "Reactivity Series" is totally different to the real one? thanks. Not really, they are pretty much the same Maybe the "real one" has more metals in it but thats about the onlly differene as far as I am aware, the actual table its self remains the same Cheers, Ryan Jones
MulderMan Posted February 20, 2006 Posted February 20, 2006 This is the data sheet from my exam board. If I ommit the ones not used in the exam board one from the wikipedia table, the wikipedia table starts like this. Potassium Calcium Sodium The exam board one starts like this. Potassium Sodium Calcium Im just abit unsure which one is right? Thanks.
RyanJ Posted February 20, 2006 Posted February 20, 2006 Ah, I understand the question now. Reactivity increases as you go down groups I and II... Seeing as Group I are more reactive then Group II anyway and Sodium being further up the table then Calcium I guess its open to debate, I personally agree with the Wikipedia one. Having seen Sodium and Calcium react I'd definatly say Sodium is more reactive. Lets see what the chemistry experts have too say - maybe they may be able to say for shure which is more reactive Cheers, Ryan Jones
YT2095 Posted February 20, 2006 Posted February 20, 2006 the Electro-chemical or sometimes called the Electro-motive series is a better measurement than how violently something reacts, OR is position on the periodic table. edit: seeing that table there, reminds me of how we used to remember it: People Sometimes Catch Malladies At Zoos, In The Lions Cage Someone Got Plenty. another little bit of half usefull info for you
woelen Posted February 20, 2006 Posted February 20, 2006 Reactivity is not only a function of electropositivity (or the position in the electrochemical series). Reactivity also depends on things like solubility. A metal like Al is VERY reactive, but still it is stable, because the oxide layer protects the underlying metal. Calcium also is very reactive, but Ca(OH)2 is only sparingly soluble and this makes the reaction between calcium and water somewhat sluggish. It makes the reaction between the water and calcium metal more difficult, because it blocks free access of water to the metal. If NaOH were slightly soluble in water, then Na would not react violently with water. It is the combination of electropositive nature and the perfect solubility of the reaction product, which makes Na (and K and heavier alkali metals) so reactive. The effect of protective layer formation due to insoluble or sparingly soluble reaction products is nicely demonstrated with aluminium, when it is scratched and a small amount of mercury is put on the scratched area. The mercury forms an amalgam and this prevents the formation of an adhesive oxide layer. The Al is oxidized, but the oxide does not stick to the metal and hence the metal is corroded quickly. You can actually see it 'rot away', especially when it is humid.
YT2095 Posted February 20, 2006 Posted February 20, 2006 is nicely demonstrated with aluminium, when it is scratched and a small amount of mercury is put on the scratched area. The mercury forms an amalgam and this prevents the formation of an adhesive oxide layer. The Al is oxidized, but the oxide does not stick to the metal and hence the metal is corroded quickly. You can actually see it 'rot away'. yeah, that SOoooo reminds me of adding freshly torn alu foil to gallium metal (and much less toxic than mercury) the reaction is fascinating to watch when you consider that it occurs at Room Temp, it`s like something you see in metal foundry at a 1000+c happening on your desk and yes, before anyone says anything, the Simple Things still amuse/fascinate me (hope they always do!).
jdurg Posted February 20, 2006 Posted February 20, 2006 Ah' date=' I understand the question now. Reactivity increases as you go down groups I and II... Seeing as Group I are more reactive then Group II anyway and Sodium being further up the table then Calcium I guess its open to debate, I personally agree with the Wikipedia one. Having seen Sodium and Calcium react I'd definatly say Sodium is more reactive. Lets see what the chemistry experts have too say - maybe they may be able to say for shure which is more reactive Cheers, Ryan Jones[/quote'] Heh. In that case it was very astute of them to completely leave lithium off of that list as it would be higher up than potassium is.
RyanJ Posted February 20, 2006 Posted February 20, 2006 Heh. In that case it was very astute of them to completely leave lithium off of that list as it would be higher up than potassium is. Really :S So, can any of the experts resolve the issue, is Calcium mmore reactive than Sodium or vice versa? Cheers, Ryan Jones
sunspot Posted February 20, 2006 Posted February 20, 2006 Another way to look at reactivity is via electronegativity. This indicates the affinity for electrons, with the lowest numbers being the most reactive with respect to losing electrons, the highest being the most reactive with respect to gaining electrons.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now