Universal Mind Discovered!!!

[Amod]

If you ever read this message,go straight to the bold text beneath.

 

"Chance rewards its patient labours" as they say is true !

I chanced a fact during research in June 2000 that has enabled me to discover

the complete brain power (Mental Quantum) of the human species or race(s).

And the Mental Quantum (MQ) discovery has also led me to invent an excellent mode of revealing any event of interest as whether it is of the past,present or future

with a tremendous accuracy;by using binary(base 2) codes which is purely mathematical.

In summary this format is far accurate to be compared with any astrological,spiritual

or computer-simulation predictions.But the only and only shortcomings of this format lies in delay(long and repetitive procedures )and human error (possible oversight) during calculation.

Therefore if it is mechanised or computerised successfully to curtail or avoid human error

and maximise the speed of calculation,then man shall have the way to obtain 100% knowledge of the Universe;that is what has happened in the past,what is hidden presently and what is yet to happen in the future.That is to say the model gets rid of 'Distance or Space & Time ' barriers utilising mathematical sensations to a degree of 100% certainty.

Believe me,this model can be best termed :the Universal-Wit or simply the Brain-Mirror.

It took me a little beyond 5years (1st week of June 2000 to1st weeek of July 2005) that is from the period of its discovery to specialisation.

What is now left is how to facilitate its computerization.

Some applicable areas of this invention are:

1.To forsee natural disasters such as earthquakes,hurricanes,etc.

2,To produce excellent medicines for very resistive

infections ,especially infections of viruses.

3.To prevent man-made disasters such as unforseen plane crashes and accidents due to unforseen mechanical failures.

4.To detect terrorists activities and their hide-outs.

Any question or assistance related to this invention is welcome.(FIRST POSTED IN NOVEMBER 2005) UNDER PSEUDOSCIENCE FORUM)

However the good news for the members of this forum is that, the invention has been successfully programmed or computerised . I hereby wish to state that, any interested member of this forum has the chance to run the trial version of the program whose accuracy is made or set to be @65% (15% above doubt,since 50%=doubt).

Also the perfect(@100%) version can be obtained on special or private request.I am now trying to manage the attachment since it is not easy to me.This is because the program comprises of 31 files compiled into 2 folders by my programmer. If any tip on attachments to this site please help.

[Sisyphus]

Sweet!

[Phi for All]

I've been bating my breath for quite some time now. This will help me win the lottery? Will I have to buy a ticket?

[Royston]

I do feel privileged having access to this 100% accurate, model of prediction...but what if this all-powerful insight falls into the wrong hands.

 

Amod, I think you should be very careful whom you divulge this information to.

[Amod]

I've been bating my breath for quite some time now. This will help me win the lottery? Will I have to buy a ticket?

 

Surely,but expect a few errors @35%.Because @65% accuracy is short of 35%.It means the program cannot differentiate

"xy" from "yx", e.g "25" cannot be differentiated from "52" and also expect errors of (65/35)=1.857142...,closely a deviation of 2

( +2 0r -2) from the target answer.Nevertheless, if you predict 5 Nos out of 90 Nos expect

@2 numbers accurately with @2 numbers reversed or

a deviation (+2 0r -2)

[Illuminati]

Hmm, I really don't understand what you're getting at.

 

It may be that it's still early, but you say you have a program which can predict everything?

 

How does something like that work?

And how did you create something like this?

[YT2095]

damn you!, I just spent $17.00 on eBay for a new set of Tarot cards and NOW you tell me I don`t need them!

 

so anyway, what does your s/ware tell you about the fate of this thread?

[Amod]

Hmm' date=' I really don't understand what you're getting at.

 

It may be that it's still early, but you say you have a program which can predict everything?

 

How does something like that work?

And how did you create something like this?[/quote']

 

Please any member willing to use this vital program should kindly follow the below text(Usage Of Universal Mind) before-hand.

As he imagines how to frame an "or-question" accurately and attentively:

 

USAGE OF UNIVERSAL MIND:

As though one is using a pen to mark points along a short line which is equal to the length of the space bar on the computer

Keyboard without interruption (without talking or listening to any person) 16 lines of points are marked (without counting the points), whiles repeating what I term as an “Or-question”.

An or-question is any statement that becomes a question when “or” is attached to it.

For example; Michael stole the money or? Is an or-question?

Therefore “Michael stole the money or?” is memorized or cited quietly and repeatedly until the end of the markings of the 16 lines of points. At the end of the 16th line when the Ctrl-key is pressed the program either Confirms (if TRUE) or denies (if FALSE) the accuracy of the Or-question.

The answer to the or-question corresponds to a range of strain & stress;

1.Excellent (TRUE)

2.Very Good (TRUE)

3. Good (TRUE)

4 Undefined (ERROR); repeat attentively or adjust the or-question and try again

5. Bad (FALSE)

6.Worse (FALSE)

7.Worst (FALSE)

One may care to ask why not simply TRUE or FALSE?

The answer to this simple rhetorical question lies here;

Imagine two friends Michael and Smith in Egypt traveled to America, and both are expected to be back to Egypt on December 25,2006.

And a curious friend, John wants to know if they shall successfully return as they promised to celebrate the Christmas with him.

Here the or-question should be framed as:

“Both Michael and Smith shall come on December 25,2006 or?”

ANWER(S):

1.If neither will come on December 25,2006:

Answer; expect “Worse” or “Worst”=FALSE

2.If both shall come earlier or later than the day stated:

Answer; expect “Bad”=FALSE

3.If only one of them (Michael) shall return on the correct date:

Answer; expect “Undefined”=ERROR

4.And if both shall come on the correct date (but a very late hour):

Answer; expect “Good”=TRUE

5. And if both shall come on the correct date (as early as possible):

Answer; expect “Very Good” or “Excellent”=TRUE.

GUIDE:

The Ctrl-key on the computer keyboard is used to switch from one line unto the next line after the points along the line are completed.

Note that the finger used to touch the space-key

MUST KEEP MOVING along at your reading speed [neither too fast nor too slow].

PROCEDURE: At least one of these procedures will befit you:

1.Only the index finger for marking the points and back to switch the Ctrl-key; repeat this procedure non-stop for all the 16 lines.

2.The right index finger for marking & the left (thumb or any suitable finger) to switch (from line to line) by pressing the

Ctrl-key; repeat this procedure non-stop for all the 16 lines.

[Sisyphus]

I do feel privileged having access to this 100% accurate' date=' model of prediction...but what if this all-powerful insight falls into the wrong hands.

 

Amod, I think you should be very careful whom you divulge this information to.[/quote']

 

Too late! This is just the tool I need to consolidate my evil domination of the world's governments.

[JohnB]

Predicts anything huh? Okay.

 

"The next version of Windows will install quickly and work perfectly or"

[Amod]

Predicts anything huh? Okay.

 

"The next version of Windows will install quickly and work perfectly or"

 

Exactly! You may opt to attach a question mark (?) or not.

And momerise that throughout your marking of the points

(16 lines uninterrupted) and a silent background(if possible): or else if interrupted cancel and re-start.

For a precise answer(s).

 

Dear members/moderators of this forum any guide to attachment of folders or files

on this site?

[Phi for All]

Dear members/moderators of this forum any guide to attachment of folders or files

on this site?

Click Reply, see Additional Options, Attach Files, Manage Attachments, browse your hard drive till you find what you want, upload it.

[CPL.Luke]

answer me this, who will win the mets game on may 5th?

 

 

actually, predict the outcomes of the next 10 mets games after that date

[Lan-iri]

answer me this' date=' who will win the mets game on may 5th?

 

 

actually, predict the outcomes of the next 10 mets games after that date[/quote']

 

The sweetness of a pudding is in the eating.Why cann't you wait for the program to do it yourself?

[Red Shift]

ok for us guys who don't have the intellect that you fellas have, what exactly is going on? LOL im not smart enough to understand the workings of this but i am still very interested, sounds kinda crazy though?

[Phi for All]

im not smart enough to understand the workings of this but i am still very interested, [b']sounds kinda crazy though?[/b]

You've grasped the entire concept in your last four words. You sound plenty smart to me.

[Royston]

The sweetness of a pudding is in the eating.Why cann't you wait for the program to do it yourself?

 

It's not much fun being teased by the pudding of prediction...if we can't access the file, how can we even have a sniff of this sweet delight ?

 

Do you know how many sleepless nights I've had, wondering how I can wield such power...just inches from my grasp.

[Amod]

I do feel privileged having access to this 100% accurate' date=' model of prediction...but what if this all-powerful insight falls into the wrong hands.

 

Amod, I think you should be very careful whom you divulge this information to.[/quote']

 

With reference to the last paragraph above I need to be cautious indeed but I will NOT keep the program/idea alone;because I suffered for the idea for the sake of mankind .I only need to be careful of whom I give it to and also reduce its accuracy to the minimum level it can work.

As I promised I will surely give but.....examine the answer of the below

"or-question" by the program:

[the tree]

Amod, I don't think Snail was being sincere. After all, do you actually have a program?

[Amod]

The attachment failed in my first attempt (05/05/2006) message!

 

With reference to the last paragraph above I need to be cautious indeed but I will NOT keep the program/idea alone;because I suffered for the idea for the sake of mankind .I only need to be careful of whom I give it to and also reduce its accuracy to the minimum level it can work.

As I promised I will surely give but.....examine the answer of the below

"or-question" by the program:

Anymember can post up to 3 orquestion(correctly framed or I will not answer it if more or wronly framed).I lack security in my country' date='I will therefore not answer highly sensitive orquestions ok.

Attached is an answer to an orquestion by the program:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

The attachment failed in my first attempt (05/05/2006) message!

 

With reference to the last paragraph above I need to be cautious indeed but I will NOT keep the program/idea alone;because I suffered for the idea for the sake of mankind .I only need to be careful of whom I give it to and also reduce its accuracy to the minimum level it can work.

As I promised I will surely give but.....examine the answer of the below

"or-question" by the program:

Anymember can post up to 3 orquestion(correctly framed or I will not answer it if more or wronly framed).I lack security in my country,I will therefore not answer highly sensitive orquestions ok.

Attached is an answer to an orquestion by the program:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

ANSWER TO ORQUESTION PAGE SHOWN BELOW

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

ANSWER TO ORQUESTION PAGE SHOWN BELOW

[the tree]

Urm, no it isn't. Can't you just accept failure?

[Meh]

What the ****?

[the tree]

Oh don't worry, it's just your bog standard crazy guy.

[Amod]

The second @ttachment also failed,I will therefore like to refer you to an email created for that purpose and later the program if I find a way out.

To see the @ttachment,use the password science to open the email: universalmind3@yahoo.com

Either go to :SENT items or INBOX to open the @ttached files.

Please do not delete or write any text there. Rather communicate with me through SFN.

[Amod]

My system has a problem that always lead to the failures of attachments: hence I hope to put things in order as early as possible.

But any correctly framed orquestion posted shall be answered simply by postage instead of by attachment. Bye!