Bill Nye Guy Posted May 15, 2006 Posted May 15, 2006 Well i am making a huge project that concerns the testing of water quality in a rural and city environment. It is obvious to assume that a city location will have more acidic concentration, more nitrate, iron, and chloride concentration then a rural environment. My question is that i need to make a null hypothesis on this topic (null means that it can be disputed or refuted) can anyone help me in making a null hypothesis on this topic. Thanks alot everyone
CharonY Posted May 15, 2006 Posted May 15, 2006 There is no significant difference in xxx contamination between rural and city environments. While it is not my field of expertise I am a little bit doubtful regarding nitrate and possibly iron contamination between rural and city areas, btw. I am not sure if for instance fertilizers in rural areas might not raise the contamination to city levels. And regarding iron, especially in anoxic subsurfaces and aquifers the concentration can be extremely high. Just some random thoughts, though.
ragnarok Posted May 16, 2006 Posted May 16, 2006 hummm i dont know what your NULL hypothesis would be.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now