Cap'n Refsmmat Posted May 18, 2006 Share Posted May 18, 2006 Researchers have now focused their efforts at a new way of controlling an aircraft's control surfaces - wireless networks. Modern aircraft are often "fly-by-wire," where control commands are sent by computer link, and the new technology takes it to a higher level, with no cables involved altogether. It may sound crazy, but there are potential uses, such as backup control systems (in case a control cable is cut) or to reduce complexity and weight of larger aircraft by moving some systems to wireless control. http://www.newscientisttech.com/article/dn9176-flybywireless-plane-takes-to-the-air.html Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
insane_alien Posted May 18, 2006 Share Posted May 18, 2006 wow, looks good. although there is the potential for the signals to be hacked i suppose. and the planes won't be able to fly through a storm, the interference would disrupt the signal and possibly lead to loss of control Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DV8 2XL Posted May 19, 2006 Share Posted May 19, 2006 I would guess that given an aircraft control has only one axis of freedom you could build so much redundancy into the system that it would be for all practical purposes jam/interference proof Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dr. Dalek Posted May 19, 2006 Share Posted May 19, 2006 I would guess that given an aircraft control has only one axis of freedom you could build so much redundancy into the system that it would be for all practical purposes jam/interference proof If there is a way to do-in a system like that you know someone will figure it out and do it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DV8 2XL Posted May 19, 2006 Share Posted May 19, 2006 Airplanes are vulnerable things, there are a lot of ways to knock them out of the sky. However if this were implemented in the Terahertz band (where propagating is very short range) and there was enough handshaking between the nodes, I think it could be made reasonably secure. At any rate a EMF pulse will kill Fly-by-Wire as it is. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dr. Dalek Posted May 20, 2006 Share Posted May 20, 2006 Airplanes are vulnerable things, there are a lot of ways to knock them out of the sky. However if this were implemented in the Terahertz band (where propagating is very short range) and there was enough handshaking between the nodes, I think it could be made reasonably secure. At any rate a EMF pulse will kill Fly-by-Wire as it is. Is EMF similar to EMP? Were is the distinction? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DV8 2XL Posted May 20, 2006 Share Posted May 20, 2006 Electromotive Force - Electromagnetic Pulse Six of one; half-dozen of the other. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SmallIsPower Posted May 24, 2006 Share Posted May 24, 2006 If it ain't broke don't fix it, remember, the Titanic was "unsinkable". Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
calbiterol Posted June 6, 2006 Share Posted June 6, 2006 For that matter, an EMP / EMF pulse will kill pretty much any airplane. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now