Sayonara Posted June 4, 2004 Posted June 4, 2004 what you want: Video 128mbwhat you need: Video 32mb (64 if gamer) lol
Dave Posted June 4, 2004 Posted June 4, 2004 hey, computer comapnies are selling 3.03Ghz and a bit faster as a top range product, what happened to all the numbers between 3GHz and 10GHz? What exactly do you mean by that?
MindOfChaos Posted February 6, 2006 Posted February 6, 2006 They'll have to build a new chip fab first. And 10Ghz is only a few years if Moore's law holds. about 2.5years. Anyone remember 'Rambus'? ....still waiting.
insane_alien Posted February 6, 2006 Posted February 6, 2006 so its clock speed is 10GHz, big deal, whats its FLOPS rating? FLOPS is much better at indicating the processing power of a CPU than the clock rate.
5614 Posted February 6, 2006 Posted February 6, 2006 I dunno about 10GHz, but the last world record I have heard of was the 5GHz one, as found here: http://www.tomshardware.com/2003/12/30/5_ghz_project/index.html (and a video to get here: http://www.tomshardware.com/2003/12/30/5_ghz_project/page3.html ) Although looking at the spec of the original processor I'm sure that if someone wanted to break that record they could (by overclocking one of the current fastest processors).
Sayonara Posted February 6, 2006 Posted February 6, 2006 This thread is ancient in terms of CPU development.
EvoN1020v Posted February 6, 2006 Posted February 6, 2006 I am curious... how much does the 10Ghz Intel processors cost?
Klaynos Posted February 7, 2006 Posted February 7, 2006 I dunno about 10GHz' date=' but the last world record I have heard of was the 5GHz one, as found here: http://www.tomshardware.com/2003/12/30/5_ghz_project/index.html(and a video to get here: http://www.tomshardware.com/2003/12/30/5_ghz_project/page3.html ) Although looking at the spec of the original processor I'm sure that if someone wanted to break that record they could (by overclocking one of the current fastest processors).[/quote'] Which means given the fact the post was made less than 2.5 years ago (more like 1.5) there is a whole year for the record to be broken and according to the law then that's about right....
MindOfChaos Posted February 7, 2006 Posted February 7, 2006 Which means given the fact the post was made less than 2.5 years ago (more like 1.5) there is a whole year for the record to be broken and according to the law then that's about right.... The mention of 2.5 years time was made on 01-31-2003, 11:02 AM. So its actually 3 years now.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now