Skye Posted July 10, 2006 Share Posted July 10, 2006 I got one of those flyers from a local politician in the mail today, asking me what my priorities are and the like. The politician was still in university, so probably in her early twenties. I thought this was probably a bit young and inexperienced in the ways of the world to represent me in parliament. So I wondered what everybody else thought. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ecoli Posted July 10, 2006 Share Posted July 10, 2006 I don't really see why that would be a problem. The mind is still sharp... better too young than too old, I think. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Phi for All Posted July 10, 2006 Share Posted July 10, 2006 Like most things, I think good representation should be a mix of all views, old and young, conservative and liberal, fiscally and socially minded, passionate and calculating. Only when all sides are considered can you be sure of a considered vote. If the entire parliament were just out of college, or all in their sixties, then you'd be in trouble. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Saryctos Posted July 10, 2006 Share Posted July 10, 2006 The only problem I see with young politicians is the flip flop fad factor(jeez so many Fs). The older politicians will tend to stick to their guns, some may call it stubornness, but that's what you vote for, a viewpoint that you want. If the younger candadites are likely to change their view on an issue they would e a thorn in the side of those who voted for them. Another problem I see is that when lobbying their age will give off less authority and might have trouble gaining support from special interest groups. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pangloss Posted July 10, 2006 Share Posted July 10, 2006 Guess it depends on what sort of office they're running for. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sisyphus Posted July 10, 2006 Share Posted July 10, 2006 I don't think someone in their early 20s is necessarily unqualified for that kind of a job, I just think they're very, very likely to be unqualified. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
swansont Posted July 10, 2006 Share Posted July 10, 2006 I think someone who is still in college/university, who has probably never held a job to support one's self full-time or dealt with certain issues, is probably out of touch with a reasonable fraction of the population. Then again, coddled uber-rich horses' rear-ends who don't have to try and make ends meet or deal with (what are for the rest of us) everyday issues are just as out of touch. Pick your poison. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Severian Posted July 10, 2006 Share Posted July 10, 2006 As long as they are over 18 I see no problem. There are plenty of really really crap old politicians out there, so I don't think age is any measure of competance. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SmallIsPower Posted July 19, 2006 Share Posted July 19, 2006 In my immediate area, there are 2 city council members in their early 20's. There are no complaints about their compenence, and I haven't heard any comments about them being corrupt, which is somewhat unusual here. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bob000555 Posted August 5, 2006 Share Posted August 5, 2006 Even the greatest of leaders where once in there 20s. JFK entered the house of representatives at the age of 29. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now