CanadaAotS Posted August 16, 2006 Share Posted August 16, 2006 I noticed a pattern when you would square a number and add the digits together... ex. 15*15 = 225 2 + 2 + 5 = 9 1 - 1 2 - 4 3 - 9 4 - 7 5 - 7 6 - 9 7 - 4 8 - 1 9 - 9 10 - 1 11 - 4 12 - 9 13 - 7 14 - 7 15 - 9 16 - 4 17 - 1 18 - 9 19 - 1 20 - 4 I won't go any farther, and just assume that it keeps going. Does anyone know why though? as in a proof as to why? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NMajik Posted August 16, 2006 Share Posted August 16, 2006 I'm sorry if I've misunderstood you, but it seems to me that this isn't going to repeat indefinitely. For example, when 97 is squared, 679 is the result. 6+7+9=22, which isn’t equal to 1, 4, 7, or 9. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
timo Posted August 16, 2006 Share Posted August 16, 2006 I'm sorry if I've misunderstood you, but it seems to me that this isn't going to repeat indefinitely. For example, when 97 is squared, 679 is the result. 6+7+9=22, which isn’t equal to 1, 4, 7, or 9. But 2+2 = 4. And since his period has a length of 9, you would expect the 7th entry to be there, which in fact is 4. I wouldn´t be too surprised if that periodic behaviour indeed exists and I don´t think it is too hard to proof it, either. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NMajik Posted August 16, 2006 Share Posted August 16, 2006 Good point. I should have given it some more thought. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
insane_alien Posted August 16, 2006 Share Posted August 16, 2006 97 squared is 9409 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NMajik Posted August 16, 2006 Share Posted August 16, 2006 ...Sure it is.... I knew that. But the sum is still 22... I feel dumb now Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
insane_alien Posted August 16, 2006 Share Posted August 16, 2006 679 isn't even a square. man, i've been drinkin and i knew that was way off. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NMajik Posted August 16, 2006 Share Posted August 16, 2006 Haha, yeah. That was pretty terrible. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
shmoe Posted August 21, 2006 Share Posted August 21, 2006 Consider what adding the digits together does to your number mod 9. (For your pattern, it should be mentioned that you repeat this 'adding the digits together' operation until you get a single digit) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Severian Posted August 21, 2006 Share Posted August 21, 2006 Yes, it is simply because it is mod 9. Clearly you only have 9 possible outcomes. But then you have a symmetry: I could write 21=2x9+3 giving 212|mod 9 = 32=9 or 21=3x9-6 giving 212|mod 9 = 62|mod 9=36|mod 9 = 9 In other words, 3 and 6 will always give the same, as will 2 and 7, etc. This cuts the possible number of outcomes down to 5. The fact that 32=9 removes a further one, and they will alternate periodically. So there isn't anything deep after realizing that adding the numbers is taking mod 9. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ragib Posted October 24, 2006 Share Posted October 24, 2006 haha i know this is a pointless post..but 97^2= 679 lol that is awesome! almost as bad as when i screwed up badly in a test, when i did 100/27 and got 268...i dont know how lol..wat was worse was that the topic was consumer arithmetic, and i used that value for the next 5 questions..i cried... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now